Every venue we know of, including those we cannot yet read vault by vault.Note 21
Concentration
Measured on what we read vault by vault, not on a venue's own protocol figure. Those count markets and positions that are not vaults at all, so a ring built from them would add up to a number no row in the table below supports.
Concentration, deeper
The same money as the ring above, cut at twenty-five instead of six. Shaded by rank, light to dark, because these are sizes rather than identities.
Both numbers are right and they answer different questions. We publish what depositors supplied to a vault; DefiLlama and most aggregators publish what is left in it after borrowers took some away. The difference is the loan book, and it is read from the vaults themselves rather than inferred: on every vault tested, what was supplied equals what is on loan plus what is sitting there, to the dollar.
| Platform | Supplied, what we publish | Lent out | Left in the vaults | Utilised |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Morpho Vaults V2 | $5.12B | $4.01B | $1.11B | 78% |
| Morpho | $2.43B | $2.18B | $255.04M | 90% |
| Lista Lending | $630.58M | $433.62M | $196.96M | 69% |
| Euler | $538.09M | $244.40M | $293.69M | 45% |
Utilisation is worth reading for its own sake rather than only as a reconciliation: a vault that has lent out most of what it holds cannot honour a large withdrawal until somebody repays, which is a liquidity risk a size figure alone never shows. Covers only the vaults whose contracts answer, a blank is a vault we did not read, never a vault with no loan book.
| # | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | lending vault | EthereumBaseRobinhood Chain | mixed | 223 | 102 | $5.12B | $1.11B22% | — | |
| 2 | lending vault | EthereumBaseHyperEVMArbitrum+6 | mixed | 164 | 78 | $2.43B | $255.04M10% | — | |
| 3 | strategy vault | EthereumStableArbitrumBerachain+1 | mixed | 32 | — | $1.24B | not disclosed | $1.20B | |
| 4 | lending vault | BSC | mixed | 25 | — | $630.58M | $196.96M31% | — | |
| 5 | lending vault | EthereumBaseAvalancheSonic+8 | mixed | 220 | 10 | $538.09M | $293.69M55% | — | |
| 6 | strategy vault | Ethereum | mixed | 4 | — | $390.28M | not disclosed | $414.94M | |
| 7 | perp vault | mixed | 319 | 139 | $272.35M | not disclosed | — | ||
| 8 | strategy vault | EthereumArbitrumBaseAvalanche+19 | mixed | 56 | — | $115.07M | not disclosed | $157.89M | |
| 9 | strategy vault | InkEthereumOptimismMonad+9 | mixed | 4 | — | $108.22M | not disclosed | $1.87B | |
| 10 | strategy vault | Avalanche | mixed | 1 | — | $99.62M | not disclosed | $124.24M | |
| 11 | strategy vault | Ethereum | mixed | 25 | — | $74.54M | not disclosed | $118.50M | |
| 12 | strategy vault | Solana | mixed | 45 | — | $71.57M | not disclosed | — | |
| 13 | strategy vault | Ethereum | mixed | 8 | — | $56.33M | not disclosed | $394.97M | |
| 14 | strategy vault | BaseEthereumArbitrumKatana+8 | mixed | 35 | — | $54.57M | not disclosed | $85.65M | |
| 15 | strategy vault | EthereumBase | mixed | 10 | — | $44.93M | not disclosed | $44.36M | |
| 16 | strategy vault | mixed | 8 | — | $27.90M | not disclosed | $28.72M | ||
| 17 | strategy vault | Ethereum | mixed | 1 | — | $26.44M | not disclosed | $31.74M | |
| 18 | strategy vault | EthereumBSC | mixed | 9 | — | $24.74M | not disclosed | $24.46M | |
| 19 | strategy vault | SolanaRobinhood ChainEthereumMonad | mixed | 11 | — | $14.21M | not disclosed | $24.15M | |
| 20 | strategy vault | ArbitrumRobinhood Chain | mixed | 5 | — | $12.95M | not disclosed | $13.73M | |
| 21 | strategy vault | EthereumMonad | mixed | 1 | — | $11.50M | not disclosed | $20.56M | |
| 22 | strategy vault | Base | mixed | 4 | — | $6.61M | not disclosed | $6.61M | |
| 23 | strategy vault | Avalanche | mixed | 1 | — | $5.05M | not disclosed | $7.42M | |
| 24 | perp vault | mixed | 1 | — | $1.74M | not disclosed | — | ||
| 25 | strategy vault | mixed | 4 | — | $1.26M | not disclosed | $1.26M |
These have vaults. None publishes a per-vault API, so each needs its own adapter or on-chain indexing, and until one is written the protocol total from DefiLlama is all we carry. This is the honest coverage gap.
| # | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | strategy vault | BaseBSCArbitrumRobinhood Chain+5 | yes | $626.6k | |
| 2 | strategy vault | yes | $578.5k | ||
| 3 | strategy vault | BSCArbitrum | yes | $534.7k | |
| 4 | strategy vault | OptimismBaseEthereumPolygon+1 | yes | $250.5k | |
| 5 | strategy vault | yes | $34.5k | ||
| 6 | strategy vault | EthereumBSC | yes | $28.3k | |
| 7 | strategy vault | BSCBase | yes | $3.5k | |
| 8 | strategy vault | BSC | yes | $3.3k | |
| 9 | strategy vault | Base | yes | $783.36 | |
| 10 | strategy vault | yes | $199.95 | ||
| 11 | strategy vault | BaseArbitrumAvalanchePolygon | yes | $41.50 | |
| 12 | strategy vault | Arbitrum | yes | — | |
| 13 | strategy vault | yes | — | ||
| 14 | strategy vault | Robinhood Chain | yes | — | |
| 15 | strategy vault | EthereumBase | yes | — | |
| 16 | strategy vault | Base | yes | — | |
| 17 | strategy vault | Base | yes | — | |
| 18 | strategy vault | Sonic | yes | — | |
| 19 | strategy vault | BSC | yes | — | |
| 20 | strategy vault | Base | yes | — | |
| 21 | strategy vault | Robinhood Chain | yes | — | |
| 22 | strategy vault | yes | — | ||
| 23 | strategy vault | yes | — | ||
| 24 | strategy vault | yes | — | ||
| 25 | strategy vault | Base | yes | — |
Every depositor gets their own smart account and the agent works inside it, so there is no shared contract with a share price and no strategy to rate, the “vault list” would be a list of customers. Their capital is real and it is counted here; what cannot exist is a per-vault record. Listing these as unread would claim a gap we could close, and we cannot.
Capital staked into a single contract that allocates emissions. There are no per-strategy vaults, no share prices and nothing to rate. This sat inside the unread total for weeks, which overstated what we are missing by more than half, a venue with nothing to read is not a venue we failed to read.