Which readers ran and when, how much of what they set out to read they reached, where our figures disagree with somebody else’s, and what we refuse to publish rather than estimate. Everything here was already somewhere on this site; no page put it together.
There is no single quality score, deliberately. One number would average a stale venue against a refused price against an unexplained gap, and those three fail differently and matter to different readers. The components are here; the composite is not.
A size read two days ago is not wrong; it is old, and the difference matters to somebody sizing an exit. A venue is called stale here after 36 hours.
| Venue | Vaults | Median age | Stale | Capital behind them |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 159 | 0.0h | 0 | — | |
| 28 | 0.4h | 0 | — | |
| 209 | 0.3h | 2 | $274.5k | |
| 25 | 0.3h | 0 | — | |
| 307 | 0.5h | 0 | — | |
| 4 | 1.7h | 0 | — | |
| 4 | 1.7h | 0 | — | |
| 49 | 0.3h | 1 | $432.6k | |
| Kamino | 44 | 2.4h | 5 | $1.07M |
| 23 | 1.7h | 3 | $173.8k |
Several figures here are also published by somebody else, and several of them differ. Each comparison carries an explanation or is marked as not having one.
These counts are a measure of honesty, not of coverage. A vault whose underlying we cannot price is published as unvalued rather than estimated. Reading the number below as a failure is the one misreading this page exists to prevent: the alternative is not a better figure, it is a made-up one.
aspern-0.3
Every published figure carries this version in its evidence block, and every assessment document is hashed under it. A figure computed under an older version stays checkable: this build can still produce the versions it has published.
How each figure is arrived at · what changed and when · the independent check