Everything read on this venue, and what has not been. Figures are ours unless a line says a venue reported them.
Users act on every vault. Whether the vault acts, moving assets when nobody deposited or withdrew, is a separate reading, and it is what separates a managed strategy from a container.
Not read yet. We have this venue’s deposits and withdrawals, which are things done to a vault; what its manager does has not been looked at. That is a gap in our reading and not a finding about the venue.
Capital staked into one distribution contract that allocates emissions. There are no per-strategy vaults, no share prices and nothing to rate, this is not a venue we have failed to read.
The venue’s own published size is $19.90M against the $0.00 we hold across 0 vaults. The two measure different things, theirs is the whole protocol, ours is the vaults we track, and the gap is our coverage rather than a disagreement.
We do not read this venue vault by vault. What is shown comes from its protocol aggregate, so no figure here describes an individual strategy.
Capital and yield are as the venue or an aggregator reports them unless a vault’s own page says it was read from the contract. Nothing on this page is a recommendation, and a venue appearing here is not an endorsement of it.