Everything read on this venue, and what has not been. Figures are ours unless a line says a venue reported them. Counted 28 minutes ago.
Users act on every vault. Whether the vault acts, moving assets when nobody deposited or withdrew, is a separate reading, and it is what separates a managed strategy from a container.
Of 8 of this venue's 25 vaults, the largest we can read — over 30 days, 6 moved assets outside a deposit or withdrawal: 229 transactions, 239 transfers across up to 1 token. That is the manager acting; whether a person or a program pressed the button is a separate question this does not answer.
Read 2026-10-11.
How much of the capital on Ember Protocol sits under a vault an agent runs, and what stands behind each answer.
$0 of $74.4M is under a vault we have reason to call agent-managed; 0.0% of the capital, in 0 of 25 vaults.
| Who can move it | Capital | Share | Vaults |
|---|---|---|---|
| Not agent-managed | $74.4M | 100.0% | 25 vaults |
Each vault counts in one band only, its strongest evidence, hover a band for what stands behind it.
Composition
Networks, not vaults. How a venue spreads across chains is a shape; which vault sits on which chain is the register below, and that is the paid half.
The party the venue names as curator or manager, where one is named. A venue is a place; an operator is somebody making decisions in it.
| Operator | Vaults | Capital |
|---|---|---|
| 25 | $74.40M |
The underlying asset each vault reports. ‘Not read’ is a vault whose asset we have not established, which is different from one holding nothing.
| Asset | Vaults | Capital |
|---|---|---|
| not read | 15 | $39.24M |
| USDC | 10 | $35.17M |
| Vault | Network | Capital | APY | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ethereum | $17.78M | 6.3% | 7 | |
| $9.95M | 10.0% | — | ||
| $8.74M | 8.0% | — | ||
| $8.71M | 14.9% | — | ||
| Ethereum | $5.75M | 13.2% | 6 | |
| $4.49M | 0.0% | — | ||
| $4.07M | 6.1% | — | ||
| Ethereum | $3.71M | 9.5% | 2 | |
| Ethereum | $2.63M | 12.9% | 5 | |
| Ethereum | $2.04M | 4.4% | 9 | |
| Ethereum | $1.64M | 12.9% | 37 | |
| Ethereum | $999.7k | 0.0% | — | |
| $952.4k | 8.5% | — | ||
| $889.9k | 8.7% | — | ||
| $717.5k | 13.5% | — | ||
| $539.1k | 5.4% | — | ||
| Ethereum | $501.8k | 0.0% | 27 | |
| Ethereum | $115.8k | 5.2% | 27 | |
| $113.0k | 3.6% | — | ||
| $69.5k | 3.2% | — | ||
| — | 14.0% | — | ||
| Ethereum | — | 0.9% | — | |
| — | 8.0% | — | ||
| — | 5.2% | — | ||
| — | 4.1% | — |
The venue’s own published size is $118.32M against the $74.40M we hold across 25 vaults. The two measure different things, theirs is the whole protocol, ours is the vaults we track, and the gap is our coverage rather than a disagreement.
Capital and yield are as the venue or an aggregator reports them unless a vault’s own page says it was read from the contract. Nothing on this page is a recommendation, and a venue appearing here is not an endorsement of it.