Loading
NEET WORLD ORDER
Blikelynot in employment education or training
Taking money
Open
TVL
$351.2k
Return
11.7%
over observed history
Recent
—
30d · 90d
Max drawdown
26.1%
peak to trough
Sortino
—
return per unit of downside risk
History
7d
807 observations
Confidence
2%
in these metrics
Value and drawdown
Range
Hover for values. Upper: vault value, with BTC indexed to the same starting capital. Lower: how far below its own peak it was.
No strategy has been declared for this vault
Everything above is reconstructed from public data. A declaration is free, signed from this vault’s own key, and cannot be edited afterwards.Note 28
Passport
Identity
Vault contract0x0399976a…4395
Network
Hyperliquid
PlatformHyperliquid
OperatorNEET WORLD ORDER0xbd9c944d…42b8
Deposit assetUSDC
Created on-chain2026-05-26
First observed by us2026-08-11
Statuslive
What is deciding
Where the return came from
Costs consumed 15% of gross profitGross realised$40.5k
Trading fees−$6.1k
Funding paid−$96.54
Net realised$34.3k
Unrealised−$14.1k
Total$20.2k
That is 5.75% on the capital the strategy currently runs.
- Slippage is not separated: without a book snapshot at fill time it cannot be measured, so it remains inside gross rather than being estimated.
- Funding is differenced across position snapshots, so it is a flow over the window rather than a level: it counts what changed hands while we were watching and nothing before that. Intervals where a position closed and reopened are refused rather than guessed, which makes the figure a floor.
Computed from 10,371 recorded fills and the funding on currently open positions. It covers the window we have observed, not the vault’s whole life.
How well it executes
from 5,000 fills over 3.27 daysTaker share 36% by value
Fee rate 2.12bps
Daily turnover $2.87M
Annual fee drag 63.1%
- · Turnover exceeds five times capital a day, so small changes in execution cost dominate the result.
How this vault behaves
from 3,000 fills over 2.73 daysTiming indicates model assisted management, confidence 68%.
- · 1098.7 fills per day — beyond sustained manual trading.
- · 28 instruments traded concurrently.
Overnight activity 20%
Hour-of-day evenness 61%
Cadence regularity 0%
Clock alignment 27%
Fills per day 1098.7
Instruments 28
Timing only. This says nothing about whether the strategy is any good — a losing bot is still a bot.
Nearest liquidation
kPEPE falls 66.8% to 0.001336 — from 0.004026 now.
That is the nearest single instrument breaching this account’s maintenance requirement, so it is a ceiling on safety: a market-wide move hits every leg at once and arrives sooner. Computed from the venue’s own margin state at 2026-08-24 23:31Z.
Current exposure
7 positions · $925.2k gross · 2.6x the vault's capital| Instrument | Side | Notional | Share | Entry | Unrealised | Leverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| kPEPE | long | $474.8k | 51% | 0.004152 | -$15.0k | 10x |
How the capacity estimate was reached
- 20 of 34 instruments showed no positive edge.
- Impact is inferred from this strategy’s own realised cost, not measured against a book.
- A 10% participation ceiling is applied where venue volume is known.
- Trade size is converted to capital using the strategy’s own capital-to-trade-size ratio.
- Capacity is capped at 50× the largest trade actually observed — beyond that we are extrapolating.
- Measured edge exceeded 100bps per trade and was clipped — above that it is directional luck, not repeatable alpha.
| Instrument | Edge | Taker | Median trade | Limit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AAVE | 163.6bps | 20% | $614.00 | Limited by market share: 10% of 29M daily volume across 30 trades a day. |
| LIT | 74.3bps | 0% | $213.00 | Limited by market share: 10% of 99M daily volume across 299 trades a day. |
| CRV | 1821.6bps | 11% | $600.00 | Limited by market share: 10% of 11M daily volume across 53 trades a day. |
| PENGU | 67.7bps | 41% | $489.00 | Limited by market share: 10% of 15M daily volume across 74 trades a day. |
| kPEPE |
Who is in it
as at 2026-08-24 19:45Largest wallet
32.2%
Top five
97.1%
Concentration
0.221
Wallets seen
20
| # | Wallet | Deposited | Share | All-time P&L | In for |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0x82c4426b…0914 | $112.1k | 32.2% | -$58.1k | 89d |
| 2 | 0xb58ce919…1bf0 | $78.0k | 22.4% | -$37.0k |
Money in and out
Ledger read 5 hours agoIn
$606.9k
42 deposits
Out
$0.00
0 withdrawals
Net
$606.9k
172.8% of TVL
Window
89d
last 42 movements
| When | Type | Amount | Of vault | Transaction |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-23 21:52 | deposit | $10.00 | 0.00% | 0x37af170f…b164 |
| 2026-08-21 10:04 | deposit | $100.00 |
The shape of the record
32 completed round tripsRebuilt from the venue’s own open and close labels on every fill. A return figure cannot say whether it came from being right often and small or rarely and large, and those are opposite businesses.
Win rate
41%
Payoff
0.45
Profit factor
0.30
Median hold
5.5h
32 round trips, 41% of them profitable, holding a median 5.5 hours. Average win $2.9k, average loss $6.6k.
What is still missing
- Operator cohort. We show what the venue still exposes; strategies deleted before we began observing are invisible, and only pre-registration can make a cohort provably complete.
- Gross-to-net waterfall. Returns are venue-reported and not yet decomposed into fees, funding and slippage.
- Off-chain exposure. Anything held on a centralised exchange is invisible to us, so the risk shown is a floor.