Loading
All vaultsThis is my vault, register it
FuturAI Labs - High Sharpe, Low Volatility
Blikely#7 of 238Systematic strategy that captures crypto volatility; buying dips, selling rebounds, all day, every day. Long-only. Max leverage 1.5x. Built for investors who prefer compounding over gambling.
The advertised rate has been moving
Over 20 daily readings it has ranged from 9.02% to 14.47%, averaging 11.71%. The tile below shows today’s quote alone.
20 readings is 20 days, not a year. We began taking them on 2026-09-19 and this window grows with the record rather than standing in for a longer one.
Taking money
Open
TVL
$166.6k
Return
7.3%
over its watched history, read on 89 of 219 days, thin enough that the figure is an estimate between readings
The venue advertises
15.7%
the share price implies 17.1% over 29 days, from 64 readings
Recent
Value and drawdown
This chart shows the last 30 days of a 219 day record; the whole-record figures on this page are measured over all of it, and the 30, 90 and 365-day figures over their own windows, dated below. The rest is the Analyst tierRange
Hover for values. Upper: vault value, with BTC indexed to the same starting capital. Lower: how far below its own peak it was.
The rate, and the seven things that qualify it
A quoted rate is one input, not a verdict. These are the same seven fields in the same order for every vault, so a high rate and a high rate nobody can withdraw from do not look alike.
- Current quoted rate
- 15.7%As the venue states it, from Hyperliquid. Passed on rather than adopted, and whether rewards are inside it is the next row.
- Rewards inside that rate
- No reward rate is published, so we cannot say whether the quote includes one.A published rate, not a verified payment. Promotional projections and amounts actually accrued are different things and this is the first.
- Realised return
- 17.1%over 29 daysDerived from the share price we read, over the window stated. Annualisation is secondary: the window is the measurement.
- Fee basis
- Inside the share priceA return derived from the share price is net of whatever the venue already deducted. Fees charged outside it are not in either number.
- Withdrawable now
- $164.6k99% of the vault
Profit, and what the value is made of
Value held less cumulative profit is the money people put in. The venue draws the two apart; the gap is the point.Range
Profit and loss since the vault opened, as the venue reports it. It ignores deposits and withdrawals: only trading moves this line.
Value heldNet money put in
Range
Solid: what the vault holds. Dashed: what depositors put in, net of withdrawals. Where the two rise together the growth was deposits, not performance.
No strategy has been declared for this vault
Everything above is reconstructed from public data. A declaration is free, signed from this vault’s own key, and cannot be edited afterwards.Note 28
Evidence
What a risk decision about this vault can rest on
Six questions, and what we hold for each. This is not a score and there is no letter at the end of it: the answers are different kinds of thing and compressing them into one number would hide exactly the part a reader needs. Where we have nothing, the row says so. 1 of 6 is not measured for this vault.
- What does it hold or lend into?DeclaredUSDCThe venue names a deposit asset. What the vault actually holds behind it has not been read.
- How much could leave now?Measured$164.6kWhat the contract will pay out now, read from it. Not the same as what is idle. A deposit here is locked: the longest lockup still running across this vault's depositors is 1 day, read from the venue's own per-depositor field on 5 of 85. That is a floor on the term rather than the term, and it is a constraint on the depositor that the vault-level figure above does not carry.
- Who runs it, and what else have they run?MeasuredFuturAI LabsA named operator with a record across every vault they run, including the ones that closed.
- What does it depend on?
Passport
Identity
Vault contract
0xb65dd7c5…8003
NetworkHyperliquid
Platform
Hyperliquid
OperatorFuturAI Labs0x92f33bee…0430
Deposit assetUSDC
Created on-chain2026-02-26
Where the return came from
Costs consumed 7% of gross profitGross realised$2.8k
Trading fees−$190.53
Funding paid−$14.62
Net realised$2.6k
Unrealised−$31.09
Total$2.5k
That is 1.53% on the capital the strategy currently runs.
- Slippage is not separated: without a book snapshot at fill time it cannot be measured, so it remains inside gross rather than being estimated.
- Funding is differenced across position snapshots, so it is a flow over the window rather than a level: it counts what changed hands while we were watching and nothing before that. Intervals where a position closed and reopened are refused rather than guessed, which makes the figure a floor.
Paid to trade. Earned by trading, after paying $14 of funding to hold the position.
Computed from 1,791 fills over the 34d in which funding could also be measured, so every part is taken from the same days. That window opens when we started watching, not when the vault started trading. Measured by differencing 1218 snapshot intervals over 34 days. 108 of 1326 intervals were not attributable, a position closed and reopened, or a snapshot was missed, so this is a floor.
Analyst tier
Detail is hidden, not absentHow well it executes
Built from 3,608 individual fills. Two strategies with identical signals can differ by hundreds of basis points purely in how they get filled, taker share, fee rate, slippage. This is the part of a result that is operational competence rather than market view, and it is what tells you whether a good year was skill or a good venue.
See what unlocksAlready a customer? Sign inHow this vault behaves
from 3,000 fills over 60.34 daysTiming indicates autonomous management, confidence 100%.
- · Trades continuously through every 6-hour window, including overnight.
- · Activity spread evenly across all 24 hours (evenness 0.985).
Overnight activity 82%
Hour-of-day evenness 99%
Cadence regularity 0%
Clock alignment 28%
Fills per day 49.7
Instruments 10
Timing only. This says nothing about whether the strategy is any good, a losing bot is still a bot.
Current exposure
2 positions · $15.8k gross · 0.1x the vault's capital| Instrument | Side | Notional | Share | Entry | Unrealised | Leverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DOGE | long | $15.3k | 96% | 0.086638 | -$28.00 | 10x |
| HYPE | long | $589.09 | 4% | 84.597 | -$3.09 | 10x |
Snapshot taken 2026-10-10 05:15 UTC. A strategy that flips intraday can look flat at every snapshot and still carry risk in between. Click an instrument to see every other vault holding it.
How the capacity estimate was reached
- Impact is inferred from this strategy’s own realised cost, not measured against a book.
- A 10% participation ceiling is applied where venue volume is known.
- Trade size is converted to capital using the strategy’s own capital-to-trade-size ratio.
- Capacity is capped at 50× the largest trade actually observed, beyond that we are extrapolating.
- Capped at 50x current capital; beyond that the estimate is unfalsifiable.
- At least one instrument hit the observed-size cap, so the total is a floor rather than an estimate.
| Instrument | Edge | Taker | Median trade | Limit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOL | 24.9bps | 9% | $571.00 | Edge 24.9bps against 2.1bps of realised cost. |
| ETH | 25.4bps | 9% | $590.00 | Edge 25.4bps against 2.2bps of realised cost. |
| XRP | 25.9bps | 12% | $559.00 | Edge 25.9bps against 2.5bps of realised cost. |
| BTC | 24.8bps | 19% | $660.00 | Edge 24.8bps against 2.8bps of realised cost. |
| LINK | 29.9bps | 14% | $279.00 | Edge 29.9bps against 2.6bps of realised cost. |
Who is in it
Money in and out
Ledger read 5 hours agoAnalyst tier
Detail is hidden, not absentWho is in this vault, and how much of it is one wallet
A vault that is eighty per cent one depositor is a vault whose price can be reset by a single withdrawal, and whose headline TVL says almost nothing about whether anyone else believes in it. Concentration is the risk a return figure never shows, and it moves before the return line does.
See what unlocksAlready a customer? Sign inWhat changed the value
18 days decomposedThe section above says money moved. This says what the movement WAS. A vault grows because deposits arrived, or because the trading worked, or because it was paid to hold a position, and a size figure renders all three identically.
| Money in and outdeposits less withdrawals, and arriving is not earning | $18,986 |
| Closed tradesrealised on the fills the venue reports | $1,656 |
| Feespaid to the venue on those fills | −$104 |
| Fundingpaid or received for holding the positions, from the venue's own ledger | −$11 |
| Open positions movedchange in unrealised profit on what was still open | −$214 |
| Not explainedwhat the terms above do not account for, 0.2% of the $2,949 that moved | −$5 |
| Change in value$151,126 to $169,894, 2026-09-09 to 2026-10-08 | $18,768 |
Performance, which is the change less what arrived and left, is −$218 over days and fills.
The shape of the record
899 completed round tripsRebuilt from the venue’s own open and close labels on every fill. A return figure cannot say whether it came from being right often and small or rarely and large, and those are opposite businesses.
Win rate
100%
Payoff
0.16
Profit factor
46.98
Median hold
1.3h
899 round trips, 100% of them profitable, holding a median 1.3 hours. The average win is $6 and the average loss $35, it wins far more often than it loses and loses more when it does. That is the signature of selling optionality, and it produces a clean equity curve until the day it does not.
What is still missing
- Operator cohort. We show what the venue still exposes; strategies deleted before we began observing are invisible, and only pre-registration can make a cohort provably complete.
- Gross-to-net waterfall. Returns are venue-reported and not yet decomposed into fees, funding and slippage.
- Off-chain exposure. Anything held on a centralised exchange is invisible to us, so the risk shown is a floor.