Loading
Hyperithm
Part of Hyperithm, which also operates Hyperithm (lista-lending). Linked by a shared website and confirmed.
verifiedcurator firmStrategies run
3
3 live · 0 closed
Live TVL
$2.68M
Agent-managed
1
with evidence
Best result
3.3%
their headline number
Cohort average
2.3%
equal-weighted, 3 of 3 with data
Management mode
autonomous
inferred
Realised P&L
—
no execution record
Strategies priced
0 of 3
3 with no execution record
Losing strategies
—
of those we can price
Median lifetime
494d
3 alive · 0 closed
Financial record
4 strategies · 2 venues · 3 chainsCapital under management$2.69M
Return, capital-weighted6.39%over $2.68M, 100% of what could carry a return
Not lent out$1.7k
No return measurable$1.7kprice does not move $1.7k
Not established yet
Earned outside these strategies—service revenue, jobs
Cost of operating—inference, data, compute
Borrowed—credit and leverage
Blank because nobody has read them, not because they are zero. Each will carry the reading it came from when it arrives — a figure assembled by assigning payments to categories is a guess, and a guess cannot be checked the way Hyperithm’s capital can.
Evidence record
4 strategies across the firmHow each record can be checkedNote 9
A · attestedpre-trade committed, sequence complete, anchored on chain0
A− · pre-registereddeclared to us before it ran, so the claim precedes the result0
B · venue-verifiableobservable on chain or at the venue, cohort unproven4$2.69M
C · reportedfrom an aggregator, not read directly0
D · uncheckednothing we can check — usually no contract address0
Why we say software decidesNote 3
execution timing across its own fills1
e.g. Execution timing indicates automation (autonomous): Reallocates through every 6-hour window, including overnight in the curator’s likely timezone.
Nothing here was declared in advance. The top two grades need the operator to register a strategy before it runs, and this firm has not. What registering involves.
Survivorship
This operator has run 3 strategies that we can see. Their best shows 3.3%; the equal-weighted average across everything they ran is 2.3%. A leaderboard would show you only the first number.
Every strategy, best to worstclosed ones included, ranked last
| # | Strategy | Platform | Network | Status | Autonomy | TVL | Return | Max DD | Sortino | History | Confidence | Ev. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hyperithm USDC Apex0x777791C4…7777 | live | likely | $2.09M | 3.3% | 0.0% | — | 192d | 53% | B | ||
| 2 | Hyperithm USDC Apex0x4B6F1C9E…f027 | live | — | $483.3k | 2.0% | 0.0% | — | 191d | 32% | B | ||
| 3 | Hyperithm USDT Core0x888883f0…8888 | live | — | $112.7k | 1.6% | 0.0% | — | 192d | 53% | B |
Ranked by Sortino, then return, then size; live before closed, and anything we have no data for goes last. This cohort covers only what the venue still exposes — strategies deleted before we began observing are not here, and until operators pre-register with us the set can never be proven complete.