Loading
Clearstar
verifiedcurator firmStrategies run
5
5 live · 0 closed
Live TVL
$6.68M
Agent-managed
—
with evidence
Best result
185.5%
their headline number
Cohort average
38.1%
equal-weighted, 5 of 5 with data
Management mode
model-assisted
inferred
Realised P&L
—
no execution record
Strategies priced
0 of 5
5 with no execution record
Losing strategies
—
of those we can price
Median lifetime
496d
5 alive · 0 closed
Financial record
5 strategies · 1 venue · 2 chainsCapital under management$6.68M
Return, capital-weighted5.05%over $3.58M, 54% of what could carry a return
No return measurable$3.10Mprice does not move $3.10M
Not established yet
Earned outside these strategies—service revenue, jobs
Cost of operating—inference, data, compute
Borrowed—credit and leverage
Blank because nobody has read them, not because they are zero. Each will carry the reading it came from when it arrives — a figure assembled by assigning payments to categories is a guess, and a guess cannot be checked the way Clearstar’s capital can.
Evidence record
5 strategies across the firmHow each record can be checkedNote 9
A · attestedpre-trade committed, sequence complete, anchored on chain0
A− · pre-registereddeclared to us before it ran, so the claim precedes the result0
B · venue-verifiableobservable on chain or at the venue, cohort unproven5$6.68M
C · reportedfrom an aggregator, not read directly0
D · uncheckednothing we can check — usually no contract address0
Why we say software decidesNote 3
None of this firm’s strategies are judged machine-managed. That is a finding, not a gap — most capital here is run by people, and the comparison between the two is the point.
Nothing here was declared in advance. The top two grades need the operator to register a strategy before it runs, and this firm has not. What registering involves.
Survivorship
This operator has run 5 strategies that we can see. Their best shows 185.5%; the equal-weighted average across everything they ran is 38.1%. A leaderboard would show you only the first number.
Every strategy, best to worstclosed ones included, ranked last
| # | Strategy | Platform | Network | Status | Autonomy | TVL | Return | Max DD | Sortino | History | Confidence | Ev. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Clearstar Yield USDC0x9B5E92fd…9DfA | live | — | $3.10M | 185.5% | 24.2% | — | 192d | 53% | B | ||
| 2 | Yield Clearstar USDC0xE74c499f…ED56 | live | — | $819.8k | 2.0% | 0.0% | — | 149d | 36% | B | ||
| 3 | Clearstar USDC Reactor0x1D3b1Cd0…4657 | live | — | $1.06M | 1.6% | 0.0% | — | 142d | 39% | B | ||
| 4 | Clearstar ETH Reactor0x09832347…1C53 | live | — | $127.5k | 1.0% | 0.0% | — | 135d | 37% | B | ||
| 5 | Clearstar USDC Reactor0x62fE596d…dC78 | live | — | $1.57M | 0.4% | 0.0% | — | 24d | 7% | B |
Ranked by Sortino, then return, then size; live before closed, and anything we have no data for goes last. This cohort covers only what the venue still exposes — strategies deleted before we began observing are not here, and until operators pre-register with us the set can never be proven complete.