Loading
This vault advertised a rate and no longer does
It quoted 152.50% at its highest and was still quoting on 2026-09-24. It quotes nothing now. A vault that has never paid and a vault that has stopped paying both read as nothing on the tiles below, and they are not the same proposition.
From 14 daily readings of the venue’s own advertised rate, which we began taking on 2026-09-19. It says the rate moved, not why.
HyperBotPro
BlikelyJust chill out, we’ll figure it out
Taking money
Open
TVL
$29.2k
Return
4.0%
over its watched history
The venue advertises
-2.3%
the share price implies 67.0% over 19 days, from 427 readings
Recent
Value and drawdown
Range
Hover for values. Upper: vault value, with BTC indexed to the same starting capital. Lower: how far below its own peak it was.
The rate, and the seven things that qualify it
A quoted rate is one input, not a verdict. These are the same seven fields in the same order for every vault, so a high rate and a high rate nobody can withdraw from do not look alike.
- Current quoted rate
- -2.3%As the venue states it, from Hyperliquid. Passed on rather than adopted, and whether rewards are inside it is the next row.
- Rewards inside that rate
- No reward rate is published, so we cannot say whether the quote includes one.A published rate, not a verified payment. Promotional projections and amounts actually accrued are different things and this is the first.
- Realised return
- 67.0% over 19 daysDerived from the share price we read, over the window stated. Annualisation is secondary: the window is the measurement.
- Fee basis
- Already inside the share priceA return derived from the share price is net of whatever the venue already deducted. Fees charged outside it are not in either number.
- Withdrawable now
- The venue publishes no withdrawable figure, so no amount is claimed either way.A reading of now, not a promise about the day somebody tries. An accruing rate with nothing withdrawable is the case this section exists for.
- History quality
- 427 readingsHow many observations the derived figure rests on. A rate from three readings and one from three hundred are not the same claim.
Profit, and what the value is made of
Value held less cumulative profit is the money people put in. The venue draws the two apart; the gap is the point.Range
Profit and loss since the vault opened, as the venue reports it. It ignores deposits and withdrawals: only trading moves this line.
Value heldNet money put in
Range
Solid: what the vault holds. Dashed: what depositors put in, net of withdrawals. Where the two rise together the growth was deposits, not performance.
No strategy has been declared for this vault
Everything above is reconstructed from public data. A declaration is free, signed from this vault’s own key, and cannot be edited afterwards.Note 28
Passport
Identity
Vault contract
0x12e358f3…0f05
NetworkHyperliquid
Platform
Hyperliquid
OperatorHyperBotPro0xd849f8e9…8dfd
Deposit assetUSDC
Where the return came from
Gross realised−$1.9k
Trading fees−$299.22
Funding received$19.73
Net realised−$2.2k
Unrealised−$59.89
Total−$2.3k
That is -7.78% on the capital the strategy currently runs.
- Slippage is not separated: without a book snapshot at fill time it cannot be measured, so it remains inside gross rather than being estimated.
- Funding is differenced across position snapshots, so it is a flow over the window rather than a level: it counts what changed hands while we were watching and nothing before that. Intervals where a position closed and reopened are refused rather than guessed, which makes the figure a floor.
- Gross realised PnL is not positive, so the cost ratio is not meaningful.
Underwater over this window. Collected $20 of funding and lost more than that trading.
Computed from 1,202 fills over the 12d in which funding could also be measured, so every part is taken from the same days. That window opens when we started watching, not when the vault started trading. Measured by differencing 988 snapshot intervals over 12 days. 9 of 997 intervals were not attributable, a position closed and reopened, or a snapshot was missed, so this is a floor.
Analyst tier
Detail is hidden, not absentHow well it executes
Built from 1,650 individual fills. Two strategies with identical signals can differ by hundreds of basis points purely in how they get filled, taker share, fee rate, slippage. This is the part of a result that is operational competence rather than market view, and it is what tells you whether a good year was skill or a good venue.
See what unlocksAlready a customer? Sign inHow this vault behaves
from 1,650 fills over 17.02 daysTiming indicates autonomous management, confidence 100%.
- · Trades continuously through every 6-hour window, including overnight.
- · Activity spread evenly across all 24 hours (evenness 0.952).
- · 97 fills per day, beyond sustained manual trading.
Overnight activity 59%
Hour-of-day evenness 95%
Cadence regularity 0%
Clock alignment 20%
Fills per day 97
Instruments 14
Timing only. This says nothing about whether the strategy is any good, a losing bot is still a bot.
Nearest liquidation, as the venue reports it
UNI rises 398.1% to 45.8407, from 9.2027 now.
Leverage 7.5× weighted by size, 10× on the most levered leg, a liquidation starts at the second number, not the first.
The closest liquidation is 398% away at the venue's own reported price. Weighted leverage is 7.5×. 1 of 2 positions carry no liquidation price, so the nearest is the nearest we can see.
Current exposure
2 positions · $13.7k gross · 0.5x the vault's capital| Instrument | Side | Notional | Share | Entry | Unrealised | Leverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OP | long | $7.0k | 51% |
How the capacity estimate was reached
- 3 of 9 instruments showed no positive edge.
- Impact is inferred from this strategy’s own realised cost, not measured against a book.
- A 10% participation ceiling is applied where venue volume is known.
- Trade size is converted to capital using the strategy’s own capital-to-trade-size ratio.
- Capacity is capped at 50× the largest trade actually observed, beyond that we are extrapolating.
- Measured edge exceeded 100bps per trade and was clipped, above that it is directional luck, not repeatable alpha.
| Instrument | Edge | Taker | Median trade | Limit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PONS | 98.4bps | 100% | $63.00 | Edge 98.4bps against 9.5bps of realised cost. |
| BTC | 62.6bps | 100% | $113.00 | Edge 62.6bps against 9.5bps of realised cost. |
| ETH | 24.8bps | 100% | $532.00 | Edge 24.8bps against 9.5bps of realised cost. |
| NEAR | 702.8bps | 100% | $32.00 | Edge 702.8bps against 9.5bps of realised cost. |
| ZEC | 80.7bps | 100% | $27.00 | Edge 80.7bps against 9.5bps of realised cost. |
Who is in it
Money in and out
Ledger read 7 hours agoAnalyst tier
Detail is hidden, not absentWho is in this vault, and how much of it is one wallet
A vault that is eighty per cent one depositor is a vault whose price can be reset by a single withdrawal, and whose headline TVL says almost nothing about whether anyone else believes in it. Concentration is the risk a return figure never shows, and it moves before the return line does.
See what unlocksAlready a customer? Sign inWhat changed the value
8 days decomposedThe section above says money moved. This says what the movement WAS. A vault grows because deposits arrived, or because the trading worked, or because it was paid to hold a position, and a size figure renders all three identically.
| Money in and outdeposits less withdrawals, and arriving is not earning | $20,079 |
| Closed tradesrealised on the fills the venue reports | −$2,605 |
| Feespaid to the venue on those fills | −$211 |
| Fundingpaid or received for holding the positions, from the venue's own ledger | $15 |
| Open positions movedchange in unrealised profit on what was still open | $541 |
| Not explainedwhat the terms above do not account for, 0.0% of the $4,139 that moved | $0 |
| Change in value$11,011 to $28,831, 2026-09-21 to 2026-09-29 | $17,820 |
Performance, which is the change less what arrived and left, is −$2,259 over days and fills.
The shape of the record
45 completed round tripsRebuilt from the venue’s own open and close labels on every fill. A return figure cannot say whether it came from being right often and small or rarely and large, and those are opposite businesses.
Win rate
58%
Payoff
0.63
Profit factor
0.86
Median hold
24.0h
45 round trips, 58% of them profitable, holding a median 24.0 hours. Average win $133, average loss $212.
What is still missing
- Operator cohort. We show what the venue still exposes; strategies deleted before we began observing are invisible, and only pre-registration can make a cohort provably complete.
- Gross-to-net waterfall. Returns are venue-reported and not yet decomposed into fees, funding and slippage.
- Off-chain exposure. Anything held on a centralised exchange is invisible to us, so the risk shown is a floor.