The P&L above covers 1 of 2 strategies. The other 1 carry no execution record — almost always because they closed before we began observing, and a dead vault’s fills cannot be fetched back. Those are disproportionately the failures, so read this figure as a floor on the losses and a ceiling on the gains.
Not established yet
Blank because nobody has read them, not because they are zero. Each will carry the reading it came from when it arrives — a figure assembled by assigning payments to categories is a guess, and a guess cannot be checked the way Pulse@Evo’s capital can.
e.g. Execution timing indicates automation (rules automated): 91 instruments traded concurrently.
Nothing here was declared in advance. The top two grades need the operator to register a strategy before it runs, and this firm has not. What registering involves.
This operator has run 2 strategies that we can see. Their best shows 6.0%; the equal-weighted average across everything they ran is 6.0%. A leaderboard would show you only the first number. 1 of the 2 have no usable history, so the average is computed over 1 and is likely still flattering.
| # | Strategy | Platform | Network | Status | Autonomy | TVL | Return | Max DD | Sortino | History | Confidence | Ev. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pulse@Evo-α0x22a60014…1e4e | live | likely | $106.2k | 6.0% | 1.3% | — | 7d | 2% | B | ||
| 2 | Evo-α Pulse0x6a8ba1b7…b19f | closed | — | $0.00 | — | — | — | — | 0% | B |
Ranked by Sortino, then return, then size; live before closed, and anything we have no data for goes last. This cohort covers only what the venue still exposes — strategies deleted before we began observing are not here, and until operators pre-register with us the set can never be proven complete.