Not established yet
None of this firm’s strategies are judged machine-managed. That is a finding, not a gap, most capital here is run by people, and the comparison between the two is the point.
This operator has run 32 strategies that we can see. Their best shows 1.4%; the equal-weighted average across everything they ran is 0.2%. A leaderboard would show you only the first number. 3 of the 32 have no usable history, so the average is computed over 29 and is likely still flattering.
| # | Strategy | Platform | Network | Status | Autonomy | TVL | Return | Max DD | Sortino | History | Metric conf. |
|---|
Blank because nobody has read them, not because they are zero. Each will carry the reading it came from when it arrives, a figure assembled by assigning payments to categories is a guess, and a guess cannot be checked the way Concrete’s capital can.
Nothing here was declared in advance. The top two grades need the operator to register a strategy before it runs, and this firm has not. What registering involves.
| Ev. |
|---|
| 1 | Concrete · CTCOLBUSD1a892f0ed-0…447f | Ethereum | live | — | $10.12M | 1.3% | 0.0% | 417664.93 | 51d | 14% | C | |
| 2 | Concrete · SRROYUSDC7081d7c4-d…25e8 | Ethereum | live | — | $7.07M | 0.7% | 0.0% | 46.75 | 51d | 14% | C | |
| 3 | Concrete · CTFRONTIERUSDCae9ce29c-a…595f | Ethereum | live | — | $809.6k | 0.9% | 0.0% | 19.64 | 51d | 14% | C | |
| 4 | vault name | Ethereum | live | — | $481.5k | 1.4% | 0.1% | 10.42 | 51d | 14% | C | |
| 5 | vault name | Ethereum | live | — | $99.51M | <0.1% | 0.1% | 0.78 | 39d | 11% | C | |
| 6 | vault name | Ethereum | live | — | $10.11M | 1.2% | 0.0% | — | 51d | 14% | C | |
| 7 | vault name | Ethereum | live | — | $30.06M | 1.0% | 0.0% | — | 51d | 14% | C | |
| 8 | vault name | Ethereum | live | — | $28.23M | 0.7% | 0.0% | — | 39d | 11% | C | |
| 9 | vault name | Ethereum | live | — | $298.2k | <0.1% | 0.0% | — | 51d | 14% | C | |
| 10 | vault name | Ethereum | live | — | $790.05M | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | 51d | 14% | C | |
| 11 | vault name | Ethereum | live | — | $116.61M | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | 51d | 14% | C | |
| 12 | vault name | Stable | live | — | $65.95M | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | 39d | 11% | C | |
| 13 | vault name | Berachain | live | — | $24.53M | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | 51d | 14% | C | |
| 14 | vault name | Ethereum | live | — | $20.47M | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | 51d | 14% | C | |
| 15 | vault name | Berachain | live | — | $13.43M | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | 51d | 14% | C |
3 of 32 shown in full. 12 more are listed with the vault withheld. The other 17 are not on this page at all. A plan opens every vault the firm runs and has ever closed, its net exposure across venues, shared positions, and the survivorship of the whole cohort. The count is free because the count is the finding; the detail is what Analyst carries.
Ranked by Sortino, then return, then size; live before closed, and anything we have no data for goes last. This cohort covers only what the venue still exposes, strategies deleted before we began observing are not here, and until operators pre-register with us the set can never be proven complete.