SEVERE liquidity and concentration risk on this vault, against an overall band of high.
The contract holds 3,021,510.89 USD1, read from the chain by its token. At the price we publish that is $3.02M, against the $3.02M shown above.
It quoted 1,522.42% at its highest and was still quoting on 2026-10-19. It quotes nothing now. A vault that has never paid and a vault that has stopped paying both read as nothing on the tiles above, and they are not the same proposition.
This vault deploys into one contract on ethereum, 0xf2c5d20b4e7d3f3f5fa91e833042661d8f252c7b. This contract does not derive what it is worth from what it holds: a multisig at 0x796c0fe8f8487a8c6b37ba58aae6e10ab0e89fec POSTS the figure, with the last posting on 2026-10-28. one posting may move it by at most 50 of the contract’s own units, and a posting goes stale after 7 days. Those are limits on the POSTING and not checks on the number: nothing in this contract sets it against anything the chain can confirm. So a flat unit price upstream is not evidence that nothing was earned, and a moving one would not be evidence that anything was. It is the reported book value of a strategy whose holdings we cannot see, and whoever holds that key decides it. The last posting is still inside that period.
100.0% of the capital we can attribute here, or $3.02M, belongs to 1 addresses that also hold an open vault elsewhere, the deepest of them in 4. They can leave all of them on the same morning.
Pick or type an amount to weigh it against both: what the venue says could leave now, and the largest single withdrawal anybody has made here.
The contract imposes NO notice period: a redeem settles in the transaction that asks for it.
That is not a promise of an instant exit — it is still subject to the vault having the money, which is the liquidity reading and a separate question — but there is no queue, no request step and no lock-up in the contract.
There is no exit capacity to read here, and that is the contract rather than a gap in our reading. THE CONTRACT HAS NO EXIT CAPACITY TO READ, and that is a fact about the contract rather than a gap in our reading. Asked what a holder who demonstrably holds shares could withdraw, it returned their whole holding converted, with no liquidity cap inside the answer. Asking again returns the same thing and so would any other reader: there is no figure here that measures what the vault could actually pay. The contract it is deployed into does not derive what it is worth from what it holds: a party at 0x796c0fe8f8487a8c6b37ba58aae6e10ab0e89fec POSTS the figure, last on 28 October 2026, and a posting stays current for 7 days. Asked what a real holder could withdraw, this vault returned THAT POSTED FIGURE to the unit. What a reader would take for exit capacity here is the number that party entered, converted into shares and back, so publishing it as capacity would be publishing one party’s entry as a measurement of liquidity.
A quoted rate is one input, not a verdict.
It moves only when the strategy earns or loses; deposits do not move it.
Dashed: what the venue advertised, all recorded by us, which we began on 2026-09-19.
$10.0k would be $10.1k , a gain of $72.99, 0.7% over 30 days.
Computed from the price of one share, so another depositor arriving is never counted as this strategy’s performance. Fees the venue charges inside the share price are included; anything charged outside it is not. It says what this vault did between two dates and nothing whatever about what it will do next.
Everything above is reconstructed from public data. A declaration is free, signed from this vault’s own key, and cannot be edited afterwards.Note 28
Six questions, and what we hold for each.
| Source mark | Question | What we hold | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| What does it hold or lend into? | CTQIROUSD1The venue names a deposit asset. What the vault actually holds behind it has not been read. | Declared | |
| How much could leave now? | at least $0.99 idleOnly the unlent part is known, so this is a floor: at least this much can leave. Idle is not withdrawable, and a queue, a cooldown or a cap can stand between them. | Inferred | |
| Who runs it, and what else have they run? | ConcreteA named operator with a record across every vault they run, including the ones that closed. |
One party holds more than one of the roles, or nobody can veto a change once its timelock expires.
Read over 30 days and no asset movement could be attributed to the manager. That is a reading, not an absence of one, every transfer in the window travelled with a deposit or a withdrawal.
Locked here: every depositor we read with their share of the vault, the largest single wallet, and the ledger of each deposit and withdrawal. A vault that is eighty per cent one depositor is a vault whose price can be reset by a single withdrawal, and whose headline TVL says almost nothing about whether anyone else believes in it.
See what unlocksAlready a customer? Sign inWhat this page cannot show yet, and why.
The band weighs them against everything else, which is why it can read better without being in conflict.
Evidence · Not scored · 4 of 5 components read (76% of the weight)
Point at a risk to read what it rests on.
| Risk | Reads | In the band | From |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market | Low | Yes | drawdown |
| Liquidity | Severeworse than the band | Yes | exit |
| Concentration | Severeworse than the band | Yes | concentration |
| Operating | Low | Yes | consistency |
| Controller | High | No | who may move the money |
| Evidence | Not scored | No | 4 of 5 components read (76% of the weight) |
The levels come from this vault’s own risk components and controller reading. The bars draw them; they are not a second calculation, and there is deliberately no overall figure.
The overall band weighs every component together instead, so it can read better than this and is not in conflict with it: a dimension says how bad its worst reading is, the band says what the whole weighs.
A strategy can be excellent and one key away from being emptied. THIS IS NOT PART OF THE OVERALL BAND: a vault reading low can read high here.
This is a statement about our coverage and carries no level of its own, because how much we could read is not a risk the vault runs.
Figures computed from the share price read from the vault contract as we went: 2026-08-15 to 2026-10-28, 288 observations. 30-day window from 2026-09-28. Readings from the share price read from the contract at past blocks, reconstructed afterwards (30) exist and are not mixed in: one series, one source.
These are the same seven fields in the same order for every vault, so a high rate and a high rate nobody can withdraw from do not look alike.
| Measured |
| What does it depend on? | Concrete on EthereumAllocations read from the vault, so the protocols it stands on are known. | Measured |
| Who can change it, and how fast? | multisigno guardian, so no party can veto a timelocked change | Measured |
| How much of the above was measured? | 1 of 5 not measuredCounted from the rows above rather than asserted. Every figure on this page carries when it was read and what it was read from; the gaps are listed on /reconciliation with their size. | Measured |
This is not a score and there is no letter at the end of it: the answers are different kinds of thing and compressing them into one number would hide exactly the part a reader needs. Where we have nothing, the row says so.
The mark says where an answer came from, never whether it is good: a filled circle is a reading we made, a half circle an inference from readings we hold, quotation marks what the venue or operator states, and a dashed ring means we did not read it rather than that there is nothing to read.
Nothing here is a rating, a recommendation, or a statement that this vault is safe.
These fields are empty because nobody has attested them, not because we failed to find them.
An operator who registers gets a record that provably cannot be edited after the fact, and a grade no unregistered strategy can reach.
We have watched who controls this vault since 2026-09-13 and nothing we record has moved in that window.
That is not the same as a vault that has never changed hands: anything before 2026-09-13 predates this platform holding control state at all, and we do not reconstruct it from history.