⌘K

Live evidencecounted 12m ago

2.95days of DOT volume to unwind the crowd98%of the XMR book on one side, across 31 vaults$1.33Bunder one key with no guardian, 54 of the 427 vaults whose control we have read$309.1Mwhose control we have never read, across 3,261 vaults$1.97Bsitting in vaults and not lent out$11.36Bunder 3,688 vaults we read$4.85Bin 326 vaults where we saw automated execution, nothing declared2,115vaults declared or on a venue built to run software, holding $991.4k328software-run vaults scored, 13% of them452operators identified behind them26networks where we read capital, from Ethereum to Cardano31,476,061deposits and withdrawals read from chain97changes recorded in the last day596,592ERC-8004 agent registrations read−0.57/ 30 days365,793distinct owners behind those registrations201,012registrations carrying a readable card, 34%3,345,818paid requests on the Olas rail (deliveries are counted apart)−0.66/ 30 days87suppliers delivering that work411,494agent-to-agent jobs read on Base+0.06/ 30 days$1.0Msettled between agents, all time1,175suppliers listed on the ACP rail189agents live on Cardano76Cardano agents deregistered, 29% of all ever minted29,238escrows between Cardano agents since Jun 2025, 150 still open78%of every agent payment we read comes from 2,659 addresses that never stop313,683addresses paid once and never came back, of 516,174 that ever paid965of those payers are an agent we can name, 0.187% of them654agent hosts answered when we asked, of 2,548 probed17,118agents sit behind a host that answers nothing at all354msmedian answer from the 654 hosts that answer44%of all agent ratings were written by ten addresses, of 677,594 ratings read29,616rated agents have exactly one rater, of 47,447 rated at all94,520service endpoints declared across 38,195 agent cards we read2.95days of DOT volume to unwind the crowd98%of the XMR book on one side, across 31 vaults$1.33Bunder one key with no guardian, 54 of the 427 vaults whose control we have read$309.1Mwhose control we have never read, across 3,261 vaults$1.97Bsitting in vaults and not lent out$11.36Bunder 3,688 vaults we read$4.85Bin 326 vaults where we saw automated execution, nothing declared2,115vaults declared or on a venue built to run software, holding $991.4k328software-run vaults scored, 13% of them452operators identified behind them26networks where we read capital, from Ethereum to Cardano31,476,061deposits and withdrawals read from chain97changes recorded in the last day596,592ERC-8004 agent registrations read−0.57/ 30 days365,793distinct owners behind those registrations201,012registrations carrying a readable card, 34%3,345,818paid requests on the Olas rail (deliveries are counted apart)−0.66/ 30 days87suppliers delivering that work411,494agent-to-agent jobs read on Base+0.06/ 30 days$1.0Msettled between agents, all time1,175suppliers listed on the ACP rail189agents live on Cardano76Cardano agents deregistered, 29% of all ever minted29,238escrows between Cardano agents since Jun 2025, 150 still open78%of every agent payment we read comes from 2,659 addresses that never stop313,683addresses paid once and never came back, of 516,174 that ever paid965of those payers are an agent we can name, 0.187% of them654agent hosts answered when we asked, of 2,548 probed17,118agents sit behind a host that answers nothing at all354msmedian answer from the 654 hosts that answer44%of all agent ratings were written by ten addresses, of 677,594 ratings read29,616rated agents have exactly one rater, of 47,447 rated at all94,520service endpoints declared across 38,195 agent cards we read

Agent work

Read 11 minutes ago

What agents buy from other agents, settled on chain.Note 23

Finding

provider addresses delivered work

34.8%

of all work from one of them

72.7%

from the top three

3,345,818

request-side payment events

919,914

delivery events

Olas Mech · gnosis 98%, base 2%, optimism 0.0%, polygon 0.0% · 2025-07-07 to 2026-10-11 · 462 days

A market a competition authority would call highly concentrated.

How this is counted

The last two are counted separately and not divided. Nothing readable links a request to the delivery it became, so a ratio between them would look like a completion rate and would not be one, and it would disagree with the venue’s own lifetime figures, which a reader would be right to trust instead.

Who supplies it

concentration 2,222 HHI · highly concentrated

Provider	Network	Tasks delivered	Share of all work	Fees earned
0x601024e2…151f	Gnosis	319,726	34.8%	8060.28 xDAI
0xc05e7412…632c	Gnosis	247,219	26.9%	9105.08 xDAI

The same question, read over four windows

why the figure above is the bottom row

Read over	Suppliers	Deliveries	Top one	Top three	HHI	Would read as
30 days	38	42,832	43.2%	68.2%	2,409	highly concentrated
90 days	44	138,165	46.4%	72.0%	2,584	highly concentrated
180 days	49	397,730	44.8%	77.9%	2,787	highly concentrated
all of it	87	919,914	34.8%	72.7%	2,222	highly concentrated

Is the tail real?

The windows above cannot say. An HHI of two thousand is produced both by three large suppliers with a hundred small ones behind them and by three with nothing behind them, and a buyer is choosing between those two markets.

Every concentration figure this site published was once read over the shortest window here. Widening it multiplied the supplier count 2.3× on this rail and moved the top supplier’s share from 43.2% to 34.8%. We show the windows rather than the best of them, because a row marked as disagreeing with the full history is a row that would have had us tell you something else.