There is no overall band for these dimensions to disagree with.
Evidence · Not scored · 0 of 5 components read (0% of the weight)
Point at a risk to read what it rests on.
No exact match among the 0 addresses screened (roles), but part of the set was not screened, so the result is unknown. No holder list is held for this vault, so its holders were not screened.
Exact address matches against one list (OFAC SDN, version 329a9b9c6e55). Not a legal opinion, and no exact match is not a finding that no sanctioned party is involved.
Pick or type an amount to weigh it against both: what the venue says could leave now, and the largest single withdrawal anybody has made here.
A quoted rate is one input, not a verdict.
These are the same seven fields in the same order for every vault, so a high rate and a high rate nobody can withdraw from do not look alike.
Everything above is reconstructed from public data. A declaration is free, signed from this vault’s own key, and cannot be edited afterwards.Note 28
Six questions, and what we hold for each. 2 of these 6 questions are not measured for this vault. These are evidence questions, not the risk band’s components, which are counted under the six risks.
| Source mark | Question | What we hold | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| What does it hold or lend into? | CTFYUSDThe venue names a deposit asset. What the vault actually holds behind it has not been read. | Declared | |
| How much could leave now? | —No exit reading. This is the figure that decides whether a position can be left, and we do not have it. | Not measured | |
| Who runs it, and what else have they run? |
Locked here: every depositor we read with their share of the vault, the largest single wallet, and the ledger of each deposit and withdrawal. A vault that is eighty per cent one depositor is a vault whose price can be reset by a single withdrawal, and whose headline TVL says almost nothing about whether anyone else believes in it.
See what unlocksAlready a customer? Sign inWhat this page cannot show yet, and why.
| Risk | Reads | In the band | From |
|---|---|---|---|
| Marketlimited scope: past share-price falls, markets shared with other vaults and, where the vault borrows, distance to liquidation; excludes collateral and borrower credit risk | Not read | Yes | nothing fed it |
| Liquidity | Not read | Yes | nothing fed it |
| Depositor concentration | Not read | Yes | nothing fed it |
| Operatinglimited scope: continuity of the observed record; not a review of operations | Not read | Yes | nothing fed it |
| Controller | Not read | No | who may move the money |
| Evidence | Not scored | No | 0 of 5 risk-band components read (0% of the weight) |
The levels come from this vault’s own risk components and controller reading. The bars draw them; they are not a second calculation, and there is deliberately no overall figure.
That is our coverage, not a finding.
Unexamined is not acceptable, and this is not part of the overall band either way.
By weight, 0 of the 82.5 points that apply were read, which is 0% of the component weight the band could draw on (a different denominator: components are not equally weighted); the rest of the 100 is the weight of what does not apply. This is a statement about our coverage and carries no level of its own, because how much we could read is not a risk the vault runs.
| Measured |
| What does it depend on? | Concrete on EthereumThe venue and the chain are known; what the strategy routes into underneath them has not been read. | Declared |
| Who can change it, and how fast? | —Access control has not been read for this vault. Who can move the money, and how quickly, is unknown. That is not the same as nobody being able to. | Not measured |
| How much of the above was measured? | 3 of 5 not measuredCounted from the rows above rather than asserted. Every figure on this page carries when it was read and what it was read from; the gaps are listed on /reconciliation with their size. | Measured |
This is not a score and there is no letter at the end of it: the answers are different kinds of thing and compressing them into one number would hide exactly the part a reader needs. Where we have nothing, the row says so.
The mark says where an answer came from, never whether it is good: a filled circle is a reading we made, a half circle an inference from readings we hold, quotation marks what the venue or operator states, and a dashed ring means we did not read it rather than that there is nothing to read.
Nothing here is a rating, a recommendation, or a statement that this vault is safe.
These fields are empty because nobody has attested them, not because we failed to find them.
An operator who registers gets a record that provably cannot be edited after the fact, and a grade no unregistered strategy can reach.