Loading
Akka Hyper AI
BpossibleAkka Hyper AI Vault 1 is a directional long/short strategy powered by Akka’s proprietary AI. It trades top assets with adaptive risk control, targeting 15–20% monthly returns by adjusting leverage (up to 3×) based on model confidence.
One thing worth a look
Patterns in this vault’s record that have more than one explanation. None of them lowers its grade and none of them is a finding of wrongdoing — a ledger cannot separate the readings below, and neither can we.
- The operator holds 92% of this vault themselves.
- Equally consistent with: A manager with their own money at risk, which is usually a good sign. It does mean the return is a personal account’s, not a record of managing anyone else’s.
Measured over the last 30 days, as of 2026-08-24 17:53Z. A pattern that stops is cleared rather than left standing.
Taking money
Open
TVL
$86.6k
Return
0.7%
over observed history
Recent
—
30d · 90d
Max drawdown
1.3%
peak to trough
Value and drawdown
Range
Hover for values. Upper: vault value, with BTC indexed to the same starting capital. Lower: how far below its own peak it was.
No strategy has been declared for this vault
Everything above is reconstructed from public data. A declaration is free, signed from this vault’s own key, and cannot be edited afterwards.Note 28
Passport
Identity
Vault contract0x0e008684…7398
Network
Hyperliquid
PlatformHyperliquid
OperatorAkka Hyper AI0x190c5972…c1ef
Deposit assetUSDC
Created on-chain2025-11-11
First observed by us2026-08-11
Statuslive
What is deciding
Where the return came from
Costs consumed 6% of gross profitGross realised$5.5k
Trading fees−$333.97
Funding received$3.86
Net realised$5.2k
Unrealised$65.63
Total$5.2k
That is 6.04% on the capital the strategy currently runs.
- Slippage is not separated: without a book snapshot at fill time it cannot be measured, so it remains inside gross rather than being estimated.
- Funding is differenced across position snapshots, so it is a flow over the window rather than a level: it counts what changed hands while we were watching and nothing before that. Intervals where a position closed and reopened are refused rather than guessed, which makes the figure a floor.
Computed from 239 recorded fills and the funding on currently open positions. It covers the window we have observed, not the vault’s whole life.
How well it executes
from 239 fills over 285.99 daysTaker share 75% by value
Fee rate 3.76bps
Daily turnover $3.1k
Annual fee drag 0.5%
How this vault behaves
from 239 fills over 285.99 daysTiming indicates model assisted management, confidence 69%.
- · No strong automation signature in the timing.
Overnight activity 27%
Hour-of-day evenness 85%
Cadence regularity 0%
Clock alignment 15%
Fills per day 0.8
Instruments 4
Timing only. This says nothing about whether the strategy is any good — a losing bot is still a bot.
Current exposure
2 positions · $17.6k gross · 0.2x the vault's capital| Instrument | Side | Notional | Share | Entry | Unrealised | Leverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ETH | long | $8.8k | 50% | 2412.1 | $240.75 | 1x |
| SOL | short | $8.8k | 50% | 94.356 | -$175.13 | 1x |
Snapshot taken 2026-08-24 18:29 UTC. A strategy that flips intraday can look flat at every snapshot and still carry risk in between. Click an instrument to see every other vault holding it.
How the capacity estimate was reached
- Impact is inferred from this strategy’s own realised cost, not measured against a book.
- A 10% participation ceiling is applied where venue volume is known.
- Trade size is converted to capital using the strategy’s own capital-to-trade-size ratio.
- Capacity is capped at 50× the largest trade actually observed — beyond that we are extrapolating.
| Instrument | Edge | Taker | Median trade | Limit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BTC | 67.1bps | 76% | $1.1k | Edge 67.1bps against 7.6bps of realised cost. |
| BNB | 54.2bps | 55% | $488.00 | Edge 54.2bps against 5.7bps of realised cost. |
| ETH | 19.5bps | 70% | $2.8k | Edge 19.5bps against 7.2bps of realised cost. |
Who is in it
as at 2026-08-24 01:27Largest wallet
91.6%
Top five
99.7%
Concentration
0.843
Wallets seen
21
| # | Wallet | Deposited | Share | All-time P&L | In for |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Leader | $78.8k | 91.6% | $2.3k | 285d |
| 2 | 0x187a9838…517a | $5.1k | 5.9% | $109.88 | 97d |
Money in and out
Ledger read 22 hours agoIn
$85.0k
32 deposits
Out
$0.00
0 withdrawals
Net
$85.0k
98.1% of TVL
Window
262d
last 32 movements
| When | Type | Amount | Of vault | Transaction |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-03 14:21 | deposit | $1.2k | 1.38% | 0x8f2e2fbe…9397 |
| 2026-08-02 20:54 | deposit | $674.37 |
The shape of the record
43 completed round tripsRebuilt from the venue’s own open and close labels on every fill. A return figure cannot say whether it came from being right often and small or rarely and large, and those are opposite businesses.
Win rate
60%
Payoff
1.27
Profit factor
1.95
Median hold
30.3h
43 round trips, 60% of them profitable, holding a median 30.3 hours. Average win $321, average loss $252.
What is still missing
- Operator cohort. We show what the venue still exposes; strategies deleted before we began observing are invisible, and only pre-registration can make a cohort provably complete.
- Gross-to-net waterfall. Returns are venue-reported and not yet decomposed into fees, funding and slippage.
- Off-chain exposure. Anything held on a centralised exchange is invisible to us, so the risk shown is a floor.