Loading
Depositors
Every return figure elsewhere on this site belongs to a vault. These belong to the people in it, and they are different numbers whenever people arrived at different times, which is always.
Depositor books are read for 679 of 2,595 open vaults we can size, holding $7.76B of $11.34B (68% of the capital). A venue that does not publish who is inside its vaults is absent from everything below, which is an absence rather than a finding about its depositors.
Net investor return
What the depositors earned, not what the vault did
The venue’s own all-time profit for each depositor, over the capital that earned it. Nothing is annualised: the advertised rate is scaled down to how long people have actually held, rather than a short return being scaled up to a year.
$280.96M
Capital measured
earned $19.39M
6.90%
What the money made
over each depositor’s own holding period
46.61%
Depositors down
1,769 of 3,795, while the money was up
173 of 228
Below today’s quote
today’s advertised rate against what depositors earned over their own, earlier periods: context, not a test of what was promised then
Net investor return
Up or down, among the depositors still in
- Ahead
- 2,02653%
- Down
- 1,76947%
The figure an advertised rate structurally cannot contain. A depositor who withdrew everything is not in this count, and the ones who left after losing money are exactly the ones a return figure most needs. So this is the state of the investors still in a vault, not of its investors.
How this figure was arrived at
- Metric
- investor-return
- Population
- reconstructable_depositor_positionsDepositor positions whose entry and value history we hold on both sides of the entry, so a return means something. A position we can see but cannot date is counted and not measured: any return for it would be a guess about when the money arrived.
- Denominator
- 3,795 ratio · 100.0% of it
- Source
- Computed here from figures this platform already holds.
- Grade
- B
- Read at
- 2026-10-11 01:15 UTC
- Methodology
- aspern-0.3
- Snapshot
- cmv34sc5n1202leofc7j1u3b2
What was advertised, against what depositors kept
One line per vault, worst gap first. The hollow mark is the venue’s own rate scaled to how long its depositors have held; the filled one is what those depositors actually kept over the same span. Only vaults whose advertised rate is one we will stand behind are drawn, so a venue quoting two thousand per cent cannot lead this chart with its own arithmetic.
-100%0%50%100%200%300%400%500%
- DailyTradeAI Low risk$126.7k488%→-75%
- HighFDV$12.1k
Where the gap is widest
Today’s advertised rate scaled to the depositors’ median holding period, against what they actually got. This is a current quote set against a past result, not a test of what the vault advertised while they held it: a rate that moved, the timing of entry, fees and rewards can each open this gap without any promise being broken. The advertised rate is kept day by day from 18 September 2026, and the like-for-like comparison replaces this table once it covers the same window. Only vaults with a rate to compare against and a week of holding at minimum are listed.
| Vault | Depositors | Held | Today’s quote, scaled | Median got | Gap (points) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCC | 1 | 629d | 1,827.84% | -25.42% | -1,853 pp |
| Elsewhere | 16 | 821d | 1,387.97% | -19.86% | -1,408 pp |
A depositor who withdrew everything is not in the table, and the ones who left after losing money are exactly the ones a return figure most needs — so this is the return of the investors still in a vault, not of its investors. The profit figure is the venue’s arithmetic and inherits its fee treatment, which is why the comparison is against each vault’s own advertised rate rather than across venues.
Addresses seen
36,860
- In one vault only
- 30,971
In two or more vaults
5,889
- Timing measurable
- 605
- Not yet measurable
- 5,284
With measurable timing
605
Behind holding from the start
72
of 605 measured
Beat holding from the start
Read this before using the ranking. The venue lists only current depositors, so anyone who entered, lost money and left is invisible, every address below survived, which flatters all of them. Only the largest 100 holders per vault are published, so smaller and earlier positions are missing. And our value history begins when we started observing, not when the vault did. This is a lead worth investigating, not a verdict.
Chance alone would put the “beat holding” figure near 50%. It currently sits far below that, which at this stage says more about the shortness of our history than about anyone’s judgement: most entries we can measure landed after a vault’s early growth was already in its average. Treat the ranking as usable only once that figure approaches half.
Chance alone would put the “beat holding” figure near 50%. It currently sits far below that, which at this stage says more about the shortness of our history than about anyone’s judgement: most entries we can measure landed after a vault’s early growth was already in its average. Treat the ranking as usable only once that figure approaches half.
Best timing
Ranked by timing rather than by return, because picking a vault that was rising anyway is not skill. 356 addresses are held out for size , because their whole stake is under $1,000. A return on a leftover balance is arithmetic rather than a decision, and ranking it alongside a stake somebody chose would sell you the wrong list. They are counted here rather than dropped, because a shorter list that looks like the whole one is the thing this page exists not to publish. 4,894 addresses are not ranked here: a vault they hold annualises past the 1000% ceiling, and an edge measured from a ceiling is the ceiling minus the vault’s own history, which would rank the worst vaults highest.
| # | Address | Vaults | Equity | Return since entry | Timing edge | Hit rate | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | $1.4k | 389.7% | 343.7% | 50% | 60% | |
| 2 | 2 | $12.2k | 289.6% | 114.6% | 50% | 60% | |
| 3 | 2 | $4.5k | 165.9% |
Analyst tier
3 of 60 shown in full. 12 more are listed with the wallet withheld. The other 45 are not on this page at all. A plan opens every depositor, concentration, and the timing of each wallet’s entries and exits. The count is free because the count is the finding; the detail is what Analyst carries.