Over 9 daily readings it has ranged from 16.61% to 137.30%, averaging 72.13%. The tile below shows today’s quote alone.
9 readings is 9 days, not a year. We began taking them on 2026-09-19 and this window grows with the record rather than standing in for a longer one.
shorting low float high FDV
Patterns in this vault’s record that have more than one explanation. None of them lowers its grade and none of them is a finding of wrongdoing, a ledger cannot separate the readings below, and neither can we.
Measured over the last 30 days, as of 2026-10-03 23:37 UTC. A pattern that stops is cleared rather than left standing.
A quoted rate is one input, not a verdict. These are the same seven fields in the same order for every vault, so a high rate and a high rate nobody can withdraw from do not look alike.
Everything above is reconstructed from public data. A declaration is free, signed from this vault’s own key, and cannot be edited afterwards.Note 28
That is 9.81% on the capital the strategy currently runs.
Paid to trade. Earned by trading, after paying $10 of funding to hold the position.
Computed from 476 fills over the 7d in which funding could also be measured, so every part is taken from the same days. That window opens when we started watching, not when the vault started trading. Measured by differencing 62 snapshot intervals over 7.1 days. 4 of 66 intervals were not attributable, a position closed and reopened, or a snapshot was missed, so this is a floor.
Built from 869 individual fills. Two strategies with identical signals can differ by hundreds of basis points purely in how they get filled, taker share, fee rate, slippage. This is the part of a result that is operational competence rather than market view, and it is what tells you whether a good year was skill or a good venue.
See what unlocksAlready a customer? Sign inTiming indicates model assisted management, confidence 100%.
Timing only. This says nothing about whether the strategy is any good, a losing bot is still a bot.
| Instrument | Side | Notional | Share | Entry | Unrealised | Leverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PONS | long | $5.1k | 100% | 0.427559 | -$42.74 | 3x |
Snapshot taken 2026-10-03 11:57 UTC. A strategy that flips intraday can look flat at every snapshot and still carry risk in between. Click an instrument to see every other vault holding it.
| Instrument | Edge | Taker | Median trade | Limit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XPL | 105.7bps | 87% | $400.00 | Edge 105.7bps against 8.5bps of realised cost. |
| VVV | 236.8bps | 100% | $250.00 | Limited by market share: 10% of 5M daily volume across 25 trades a day. |
| ENA | 40bps | 75% | $685.00 | Edge 40.0bps against 7.7bps of realised cost. |
| TAO | 50.9bps | 100% | $400.00 | Edge 50.9bps against 9.5bps of realised cost. |
| ETHFI | 175.7bps | 55% | $213.00 | Limited by market share: 10% of 1M daily volume across 55 trades a day. |
A vault that is eighty per cent one depositor is a vault whose price can be reset by a single withdrawal, and whose headline TVL says almost nothing about whether anyone else believes in it. Concentration is the risk a return figure never shows, and it moves before the return line does.
See what unlocksAlready a customer? Sign inThe section above says money moved. This says what the movement WAS. A vault grows because deposits arrived, or because the trading worked, or because it was paid to hold a position, and a size figure renders all three identically.
| Money in and outdeposits less withdrawals, and arriving is not earning | $0 |
| Closed tradesrealised on the fills the venue reports | $277 |
| Feespaid to the venue on those fills | −$16 |
| Fundingpaid or received for holding the positions, from the venue's own ledger | −$6 |
| Open positions movedchange in unrealised profit on what was still open | −$370 |
| Not explainedwhat the terms above do not account for, 0.4% of the $377 that moved | −$1 |
| Change in value$11,653 to $11,536, 2026-09-26 to 2026-09-28 | −$117 |
Performance, which is the change less what arrived and left, is −$117 over days and fills.
Rebuilt from the venue’s own open and close labels on every fill. A return figure cannot say whether it came from being right often and small or rarely and large, and those are opposite businesses.
42 round trips, 55% of them profitable, holding a median 2.7 hours. Average win $124, average loss $207.
Figures computed from Hyperliquid’s account value and profit history: 2024-05-08 to 2026-10-03, 160 observations. 30-day window from 2026-09-03, 90-day window from 2026-07-05, 365-day window from 2025-10-03.
These fields are empty because nobody has attested them, not because we failed to find them. An operator who registers gets a record that provably cannot be edited after the fact, and a grade no unregistered strategy can reach.
| NEAR | 13.7bps | 74% | $652.00 | Edge 13.7bps against 7.9bps of realised cost. |
| PONS | -256.4bps | 87% | $157.00 | No positive edge observed, capacity is not the binding constraint here. |
| LIT | -4.1bps | 60% | $193.00 | No positive edge observed, capacity is not the binding constraint here. |