Loading
Hyperliquid Evergreen
unknownStrategies run
6
5 live · 1 closed
Live TVL
$31.8k
Agent-managed
2
with evidence
Best result
14.0%
their headline number
Cohort average
-3.8%
equal-weighted, 5 of 6 with data
Management mode
rules-automated
inferred
Realised P&L
+$942.68
across 2 of 6 strategies
Strategies priced
2 of 6
4 with no execution record
Losing strategies
0 of 2
of those we can price
Median lifetime
232d
5 alive · 1 closed
The P&L above covers 2 of 6 strategies. The other 4 carry no execution record — almost always because they closed before we began observing, and a dead vault’s fills cannot be fetched back. Those are disproportionately the failures, so read this figure as a floor on the losses and a ceiling on the gains.
Financial record
5 strategies · 1 venue · 1 chainCapital under management$31.8k
Return, capital-weightednot establishednothing here could be measured
No return measurable$31.8kno share-price history $31.8k
Not established yet
Earned outside these strategies—service revenue, jobs
Cost of operating—inference, data, compute
Borrowed—credit and leverage
Blank because nobody has read them, not because they are zero. Each will carry the reading it came from when it arrives — a figure assembled by assigning payments to categories is a guess, and a guess cannot be checked the way Hyperliquid Evergreen’s capital can.
Evidence record
6 strategies across the firmHow each record can be checkedNote 9
A · attestedpre-trade committed, sequence complete, anchored on chain0
A− · pre-registereddeclared to us before it ran, so the claim precedes the result0
B · venue-verifiableobservable on chain or at the venue, cohort unproven6$31.8k
C · reportedfrom an aggregator, not read directly0
D · uncheckednothing we can check — usually no contract address0
Why we say software decidesNote 3
execution timing across its own fills2
e.g. Execution timing indicates automation (rules automated): Trades continuously through every 6-hour window, including overnight.
Nothing here was declared in advance. The top two grades need the operator to register a strategy before it runs, and this firm has not. What registering involves.
Survivorship
This operator has run 6 strategies that we can see. Their best shows 14.0%; the equal-weighted average across everything they ran is -3.8%. A leaderboard would show you only the first number. 1 of the 6 have no usable history, so the average is computed over 5 and is likely still flattering.
Every strategy, best to worstclosed ones included, ranked last
| # | Strategy | Platform | Network | Status | Autonomy | TVL | Return | Max DD | Sortino | History | Confidence | Ev. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hyperliquid Durian0xf3a3ad04…8dbf | live | — | $6.5k | 14.0% | 8.0% | — | 7d | 2% | B | ||
| 2 | Hyperliquid Y0x374b8890…f1a4 | live | — | $4.3k | 3.8% | 13.9% | — | 7d | 2% | B | ||
| 3 | Hyperliquid Coconut0x4fc9e47f…efe8 | live | — | $3.3k | 2.3% | 8.0% | — | 7d | 2% | B | ||
| 4 | Hyperliquid Evergreen0x595b9ab3…78fa | live | likely | $11.3k | 0.3% | 0.1% | — | 7d | 2% | B | ||
| 5 | Hyperliquid Banana0x8e72bb69…e0c6 | live | likely | $6.4k | -39.2% | 67.6% | — | 7d | 2% | B | ||
| 6 | Hyperliquid Cherry0x7f4aa9e3…8be2 | closed | — | $0.00 | — | — | — | 1d | 0% | B |
Ranked by Sortino, then return, then size; live before closed, and anything we have no data for goes last. This cohort covers only what the venue still exposes — strategies deleted before we began observing are not here, and until operators pre-register with us the set can never be proven complete.