Loading
0x7d07…dcd8
curator firmStrategies run
4
4 live · 0 closed
Live TVL
$24.50M
Agent-managed
—
with evidence
Best result
0.1%
their headline number
Cohort average
0.1%
equal-weighted, 4 of 4 with data
Management mode
unknown
inferred
Realised P&L
—
no execution record
Strategies priced
0 of 4
4 with no execution record
Losing strategies
—
of those we can price
Median lifetime
342d
4 alive · 0 closed
Financial record
4 strategies · 1 venue · 1 chainCapital under management$24.50M
Return, capital-weighted0.18%over $24.01M, 100% of what could carry a return
Cannot express a return$483.1kprice fixed by construction
Cannot be withdrawn now$14.39Mattributed to collateral
Not established yet
Earned outside these strategies—service revenue, jobs
Cost of operating—inference, data, compute
Borrowed—credit and leverage
Blank because nobody has read them, not because they are zero. Each will carry the reading it came from when it arrives — a figure assembled by assigning payments to categories is a guess, and a guess cannot be checked the way 0x7d07…dcd8’s capital can.
Evidence record
4 strategies across the firmHow each record can be checkedNote 9
A · attestedpre-trade committed, sequence complete, anchored on chain0
A− · pre-registereddeclared to us before it ran, so the claim precedes the result0
B · venue-verifiableobservable on chain or at the venue, cohort unproven0
C · reportedfrom an aggregator, not read directly0
D · uncheckednothing we can check — usually no contract address4$24.50M
Why we say software decidesNote 3
None of this firm’s strategies are judged machine-managed. That is a finding, not a gap — most capital here is run by people, and the comparison between the two is the point.
Nothing here was declared in advance. The top two grades need the operator to register a strategy before it runs, and this firm has not. What registering involves.
Survivorship
This operator has run 4 strategies that we can see. Their best shows 0.1%; the equal-weighted average across everything they ran is 0.1%. A leaderboard would show you only the first number.
Every strategy, best to worstclosed ones included, ranked last
| # | Strategy | Platform | Network | Status | Autonomy | TVL | Return | Max DD | Sortino | History | Confidence | Ev. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | EVK Vault eWETH-330x211711f2…fc2c | live | — | $4.03M | 0.1% | 0.0% | — | 192d | 53% | D | ||
| 2 | EVK Vault eWBTC-90x038dd0eb…45f2 | live | — | $5.60M | 0.1% | 0.0% | — | 192d | 53% | D | ||
| 3 | EVK Vault eUSDC-640x01864ae3…7ecd | live | — | $14.39M | 0.1% | 0.0% | — | 157d | 43% | D | ||
| 4 | EVK Vault exUSD-20xf1ba8c5c…b9eb | live | — | $483.1k | 0.0% | 0.0% | — | 192d | 53% | D |
Ranked by Sortino, then return, then size; live before closed, and anything we have no data for goes last. This cohort covers only what the venue still exposes — strategies deleted before we began observing are not here, and until operators pre-register with us the set can never be proven complete.