Loading
V3 momentum
BlikelyTaking money
—
TVL
$10.4k
Return
4.9%
over observed history
Recent
—
30d · 90d
Max drawdown
0.7%
peak to trough
Sortino
—
return per unit of downside risk
History
7d
269 observations
Confidence
2%
in these metrics
Value and drawdown
Range
Hover for values. Upper: vault value, with BTC indexed to the same starting capital. Lower: how far below its own peak it was.
No strategy has been declared for this vault
Everything above is reconstructed from public data. A declaration is free, signed from this vault’s own key, and cannot be edited afterwards.Note 28
Passport
Identity
Vault contract0xd21fdb5f…2454
Network
Hyperliquid
PlatformHyperliquid
OperatorV3 momentum0x556ea88d…8465
Deposit assetUSDC
Created on-chain2026-03-18
First observed by us2026-08-11
Statuslive
What is deciding
unregisteredStrategy versionNot attested — the operator has not bound this record to a specific version
Model providerNot attested — no model declared
ModelNot attested — no model declared
System prompt hashNot attested — no prompt commitment
Policy hashNot attested — no policy commitment
Inferred modeautonomous (90% confidence)
These fields are empty because nobody has attested them, not because we failed to find them. An operator who registers gets a record that provably cannot be edited after the fact — and a grade no unregistered strategy can reach.
How much to trust this
Provenance gradeBReal capital, readable at the venue — but the operator’s full cohort is unproven.
Machine-managedyes (70% confidence)
Evidence
- behavioural Execution timing indicates automation (autonomous): Trades continuously through every 6-hour window, including overnight.
Metric confidence2%63 observations over 7 days
RankingNot ranked — insufficient history
Alignment and capacity
Operator’s own share56.9%
Commission10%
Depositor wallets2
Concentration0.51 · largest holder 57%
Estimated capacity$520.4k ($260.2k–$1.04M) · floor
Net flow 30d$5.4k
Where the return came from
Costs consumed 7% of gross profitGross realised$520.00
Trading fees−$30.33
Funding paid−$7.93
Net realised$481.74
Unrealised−$36.39
Total$445.34
That is 4.28% on the capital the strategy currently runs.
- Slippage is not separated: without a book snapshot at fill time it cannot be measured, so it remains inside gross rather than being estimated.
- Funding is differenced across position snapshots, so it is a flow over the window rather than a level: it counts what changed hands while we were watching and nothing before that. Intervals where a position closed and reopened are refused rather than guessed, which makes the figure a floor.
Computed from 4,934 recorded fills and the funding on currently open positions. It covers the window we have observed, not the vault’s whole life.
How well it executes
from 4,934 fills over 45.81 daysTaker share 100% by value
Fee rate 4.5bps
Daily turnover $1.5k
Annual fee drag 2.3%
- · Almost entirely taker flow: this strategy pays the spread on nearly every trade, so its edge has to clear that first.
How this vault behaves
from 3,000 fills over 10.54 daysTiming indicates autonomous management, confidence 90%.
- · Trades continuously through every 6-hour window, including overnight.
- · Activity spread evenly across all 24 hours (evenness 0.973).
- · 284.6 fills per day — beyond sustained manual trading.
Overnight activity 77%
Hour-of-day evenness 97%
Cadence regularity 0%
Clock alignment 33%
Fills per day 284.6
Instruments 19
Timing only. This says nothing about whether the strategy is any good — a losing bot is still a bot.
Current exposure
19 positions · $1.5k gross · 0.1x the vault's capital| Instrument | Side | Notional | Share | Entry | Unrealised | Leverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BNB | long | $75.99 | 5% | 702.67 | $0.10 | 10x |
| DOT | long | $75.07 | 5% | 0.98963 | -$7.17 | 10x |
| BTC | long | $71.81 | 5% | 79114.7 | -$0.18 | 20x |
| ETH | long | $70.47 | 5% | 2496.13 | -$0.42 | 20x |
| SOL | long | $69.02 | 5% | 97.8454 | -$0.45 | 20x |
| CRV | long | $68.74 | 5% | 0.33426 | -$0.48 | 10x |
| INJ | long | $68.72 | 5% | 5.84738 | -$2.03 | 5x |
| NEAR | long | $68.04 | 4% | 2.00221 | -$1.84 | 10x |
| UNI | long | $67.57 | 4% | 4.45529 | -$2.38 | 10x |
| LINK | long | $67.52 | 4% | 12.26327 | -$3.60 | 10x |
| TRX | long | $67.45 | 4% | 0.341452 | $0.52 | 10x |
| AAVE | long | $66.97 | 4% | 140.2481 | -$3.15 | 10x |
| AVAX | long | $66.07 | 4% | 8.3044 | -$6.51 | 10x |
| DOGE | long | $65.08 | 4% | 0.094325 | -$3.30 | 10x |
| ADA | long | $63.68 | 4% | 0.223002 | -$0.55 | 10x |
| XRP | long | $63.54 | 4% | 1.542724 | -$2.80 | 20x |
| BCH | long | $60.16 | 4% | 296.28 | -$5.61 | 10x |
| kSHIB | long | $28.90 | 2% | 0.005369 | $0.50 | 10x |
| LTC | short | $328.72 | 22% | 52.2348 | $2.97 | 10x |
Snapshot taken 2026-08-24 21:54 UTC. A strategy that flips intraday can look flat at every snapshot and still carry risk in between. Click an instrument to see every other vault holding it.
How the capacity estimate was reached
- 1 of 19 instruments showed no positive edge.
- Impact is inferred from this strategy’s own realised cost, not measured against a book.
- A 10% participation ceiling is applied where venue volume is known.
- Trade size is converted to capital using the strategy’s own capital-to-trade-size ratio.
- Capacity is capped at 50× the largest trade actually observed — beyond that we are extrapolating.
- Measured edge exceeded 100bps per trade and was clipped — above that it is directional luck, not repeatable alpha.
- Capped at 50x current capital; beyond that the estimate is unfalsifiable.
- At least one instrument hit the observed-size cap, so the total is a floor rather than an estimate.
| Instrument | Edge | Taker | Median trade | Limit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ETH | 108.7bps | 100% | $11.00 | Edge 108.7bps against 9.5bps of realised cost. |
| DOGE | 139.1bps | 100% | $11.00 | Edge 139.1bps against 9.5bps of realised cost. |
| DOT | 123.1bps | 100% | $11.00 | Edge 123.1bps against 9.5bps of realised cost. |
| SOL | 88.8bps | 100% | $11.00 | Edge 88.8bps against 9.5bps of realised cost. |
| AAVE | 86.6bps | 100% | $12.00 | Edge 86.6bps against 9.5bps of realised cost. |
| BCH | 87.7bps | 100% | $11.00 | Edge 87.7bps against 9.5bps of realised cost. |
| BTC | 85.8bps | 100% | $12.00 | Edge 85.8bps against 9.5bps of realised cost. |
| AVAX | 83.5bps | 100% | $11.00 | Edge 83.5bps against 9.5bps of realised cost. |
Who is in it
as at 2026-08-24 19:46Largest wallet
56.9%
Top five
100.0%
Concentration
0.509
Wallets seen
2
| # | Wallet | Deposited | Share | All-time P&L | In for |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Leader | $5.9k | 56.9% | $250.55 | 159d |
| 2 | 0xb7376454…8395 | $4.5k | 43.1% | $484.54 | 143d |
Shares are of the capital we can observe, not of reported TVL ($10.4k) — dividing by a total that includes wallets outside our sample would understate every share and make concentration look better than it is.
Money in and out
Ledger read 3 hours agoIn
$9.4k
3 deposits
Out
$0.00
0 withdrawals
Net
$9.4k
90.5% of TVL
Window
130d
last 3 movements
| When | Type | Amount | Of vault | Transaction |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-11 22:52 | deposit | $5.4k | 52.07% | 0xd80513d5…a1c2 |
| 2026-04-27 21:02 | deposit | $2.0k | 19.22% | 0x9f83055c…5374 |
| 2026-04-03 18:46 | deposit | $2.0k | 19.22% | 0x1fd6618b…981b |
Shares are against the vault’s current size, so an old movement is measured against today rather than against what the vault was then. It is the comparison a reader wants — how much of this vault that was — and it is not the same as the share it represented at the time.
The shape of the record
171 completed round tripsRebuilt from the venue’s own open and close labels on every fill. A return figure cannot say whether it came from being right often and small or rarely and large, and those are opposite businesses.
Win rate
67%
Payoff
5.81
Profit factor
11.63
Median hold
7.9h
171 round trips, 67% of them profitable, holding a median 7.9 hours. Average win $3, average loss $0.
What is still missing
- Operator cohort. We show what the venue still exposes; strategies deleted before we began observing are invisible, and only pre-registration can make a cohort provably complete.
- Gross-to-net waterfall. Returns are venue-reported and not yet decomposed into fees, funding and slippage.
- Off-chain exposure. Anything held on a centralised exchange is invisible to us, so the risk shown is a floor.