Loading
The advertised rate has been moving
Over 16 daily readings it has ranged from 1,084.60% to 1,643.53%, averaging 1,277.17%. The tile below shows today’s quote alone.
16 readings is 16 days, not a year. We began taking them on 2026-09-19 and this window grows with the record rather than standing in for a longer one.
| TRADEMASTER.NINJA ALGO TRADING |
B#146 of 249AI-Powered Trading bots, Ninja-Level Precision www.trademaster.ninja
Taking money
Open
TVL
$15.0k
Return
-51.5%
over its watched history, read on 92 of 437 days, thin enough that the figure is an estimate between readings
The venue advertises
1,258%
the share price implies 1,748% over 29 days, from 275 readings. No verdict is drawn: one of the two is beyond planning around
Recent
165.0% · 166.1%
30d · 90d · -48.6% over a year
Market move behind it
10.9%
92.1% fall at 8.5×
Max drawdown
92.1%
a floor, read on 92 of 437 days
Sortino
0.38
return per unit of downside risk
Volatility
135%
127% of it downside
History
1.2y
341 readings, all taken at the time
Record begins
2026-09-18
began 2025-07-18, so 427 days of it are before anything here
Record rests on
Grade B
The whole record is grade B.
Confidence
100%
in these metrics
Value and drawdown
This chart shows the last 30 days of a 438 day record; the whole-record figures on this page are measured over all of it, and the 30, 90 and 365-day figures over their own windows, dated below. The rest is the Analyst tierRange
Hover for values. Upper: vault value, with BTC indexed to the same starting capital. Lower: how far below its own peak it was.
The rate, and the seven things that qualify it
A quoted rate is one input, not a verdict. These are the same seven fields in the same order for every vault, so a high rate and a high rate nobody can withdraw from do not look alike.
- Current quoted rate
- 1,258%As the venue states it, from Hyperliquid. Passed on rather than adopted, and whether rewards are inside it is the next row.
- Rewards inside that rate
- No reward rate is published, so we cannot say whether the quote includes one.A published rate, not a verified payment. Promotional projections and amounts actually accrued are different things and this is the first.
- Realised return
- 1,748% over 29 daysDerived from the share price we read, over the window stated. Annualisation is secondary: the window is the measurement.
- Fee basis
- Already inside the share priceA return derived from the share price is net of whatever the venue already deducted. Fees charged outside it are not in either number.
- Withdrawable now
- The venue publishes no withdrawable figure, so no amount is claimed either way.A reading of now, not a promise about the day somebody tries. An accruing rate with nothing withdrawable is the case this section exists for.
- History quality
- 275 readingsHow many observations the derived figure rests on. A rate from three readings and one from three hundred are not the same claim.
Profit, and what the value is made of
Value held less cumulative profit is the money people put in. The venue draws the two apart; the gap is the point.Range
Profit and loss since the vault opened, as the venue reports it. It ignores deposits and withdrawals: only trading moves this line.
Value heldNet money put in
Range
Solid: what the vault holds. Dashed: what depositors put in, net of withdrawals. Where the two rise together the growth was deposits, not performance.
No strategy has been declared for this vault
Everything above is reconstructed from public data. A declaration is free, signed from this vault’s own key, and cannot be edited afterwards.Note 28
Passport
Identity
Where the return came from
Costs consumed 3% of gross profitGross realised$2.2k
Trading fees−$1.71
Funding paid−$58.50
Net realised$2.2k
Unrealised$7.3k
Total$9.4k
That is 63.00% on the capital the strategy currently runs.
- Slippage is not separated: without a book snapshot at fill time it cannot be measured, so it remains inside gross rather than being estimated.
- Funding is differenced across position snapshots, so it is a flow over the window rather than a level: it counts what changed hands while we were watching and nothing before that. Intervals where a position closed and reopened are refused rather than guessed, which makes the figure a floor.
Paid to trade. Earned by trading, after paying $58 of funding to hold the position.
Computed from 28 fills over the 15d in which funding could also be measured, so every part is taken from the same days. That window opens when we started watching, not when the vault started trading. Measured by differencing 1134 snapshot intervals over 15 days. 6 of 1140 intervals were not attributable, a position closed and reopened, or a snapshot was missed, so this is a floor.
Analyst tier
Detail is hidden, not absentHow well it executes
Built from 28 individual fills. Two strategies with identical signals can differ by hundreds of basis points purely in how they get filled, taker share, fee rate, slippage. This is the part of a result that is operational competence rather than market view, and it is what tells you whether a good year was skill or a good venue.
See what unlocksAlready a customer? Sign inHow this vault behaves
from 28 fills over 12.4 daysTiming indicates model assisted management, confidence 39%.
- · A large share of fills land on minute boundaries.
Overnight activity 29%
Hour-of-day evenness 68%
Cadence regularity 31%
Clock alignment 100%
Fills per day 2.3
Instruments 3
Timing only. This says nothing about whether the strategy is any good, a losing bot is still a bot.
Current exposure
3 positions · $12.8k gross · 0.9x the vault's capitalWho is in it
Money in and out
Ledger read 7 hours agoAnalyst tier
Detail is hidden, not absentWho is in this vault, and how much of it is one wallet
A vault that is eighty per cent one depositor is a vault whose price can be reset by a single withdrawal, and whose headline TVL says almost nothing about whether anyone else believes in it. Concentration is the risk a return figure never shows, and it moves before the return line does.
See what unlocksAlready a customer? Sign inWhat changed the value
12 days decomposedThe section above says money moved. This says what the movement WAS. A vault grows because deposits arrived, or because the trading worked, or because it was paid to hold a position, and a size figure renders all three identically.
| Money in and outdeposits less withdrawals, and arriving is not earning | $1,215 |
| Closed tradesrealised on the fills the venue reports | $1,886 |
| Feespaid to the venue on those fills | −$1 |
| Fundingpaid or received for holding the positions, from the venue's own ledger | −$98 |
| Open positions movedchange in unrealised profit on what was still open | $2,457 |
| Not explainedwhat the terms above do not account for, 0.0% of the $7,731 that moved | $0 |
| Change in value$10,893 to $16,352, 2026-09-18 to 2026-09-30 | $5,459 |
Performance, which is the change less what arrived and left, is $4,243 over days and fills.
What is still missing
- Operator cohort. We show what the venue still exposes; strategies deleted before we began observing are invisible, and only pre-registration can make a cohort provably complete.
- Gross-to-net waterfall. Returns are venue-reported and not yet decomposed into fees, funding and slippage.
- Off-chain exposure. Anything held on a centralised exchange is invisible to us, so the risk shown is a floor.