Loading
PCC
Blikely#62 of 70irrelevant
Taking money
Closed
not accepting deposits
TVL
$43.6k
Return
-83.3%
over observed history
Recent
7.2% · -38.9%
30d · 90d · -78.0% over a year
Max drawdown
88.8%
peak to trough
Sortino
-0.36
return per unit of downside risk
History
1.6y
680 observations
Confidence
43%
in these metrics
Value and drawdown
Range
Hover for values. Upper: vault value, with BTC indexed to the same starting capital. Lower: how far below its own peak it was.
No strategy has been declared for this vault
Everything above is reconstructed from public data. A declaration is free, signed from this vault’s own key, and cannot be edited afterwards.Note 28
Passport
Identity
Vault contract0x65dfa218…9e92
Network
Hyperliquid
PlatformHyperliquid
OperatorPCC0x92e46562…34bc
Deposit assetUSDC
Created on-chain2025-01-19
First observed by us2026-08-11
Statuslive
What is deciding
unregisteredStrategy versionNot attested — the operator has not bound this record to a specific version
Model providerNot attested — no model declared
ModelNot attested — no model declared
System prompt hashNot attested — no prompt commitment
Policy hashNot attested — no policy commitment
Inferred moderules automated (100% confidence)
These fields are empty because nobody has attested them, not because we failed to find them. An operator who registers gets a record that provably cannot be edited after the fact — and a grade no unregistered strategy can reach.
How much to trust this
Provenance gradeBReal capital, readable at the venue — but the operator’s full cohort is unproven.
Machine-managedyes (70% confidence)
Evidence
- behavioural Execution timing indicates automation (rules automated): Activity spread evenly across all 24 hours (evenness 0.927).
Metric confidence43%86 observations over 579 days
Ranking#62 of 70 perp vault
Alignment and capacity
Operator’s own share100.0%
Commission10%
Depositor wallets1
Concentration1.00 · largest holder 100%
Estimated capacity$2.31M ($1.15M–$4.61M) · floor
Net flow 30d$0.00
How this vault behaves
from 2,000 fills over 99.56 daysTiming indicates rules automated management, confidence 100%.
- · Activity spread evenly across all 24 hours (evenness 0.927).
Overnight activity 34%
Hour-of-day evenness 93%
Cadence regularity 0%
Clock alignment 41%
Fills per day 20.1
Instruments 10
Timing only. This says nothing about whether the strategy is any good — a losing bot is still a bot.
Nearest liquidation
Get told when this changesSUI falls 56.6% to 0.34943 — from 0.80561 now.
That is the nearest single instrument breaching this account’s maintenance requirement, so it is a ceiling on safety: a market-wide move hits every leg at once and arrives sooner. Computed from the venue’s own margin state at 2026-08-24 19:01Z.
Current exposure
2 positions · $80.1k gross · 1.8x the vault's capital| Instrument | Side | Notional | Share | Entry | Unrealised | Leverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SUI | long | $71.7k | 90% | 2.0868 | -$114.1k | 3x |
| STBL | long | $8.4k | 10% | 0.142772 | -$38.0k | 3x |
Snapshot taken 2026-08-24 19:01 UTC. A strategy that flips intraday can look flat at every snapshot and still carry risk in between. Click an instrument to see every other vault holding it.
How the capacity estimate was reached
- 1 of 8 instruments showed no positive edge.
- Impact is inferred from this strategy’s own realised cost, not measured against a book.
- A 10% participation ceiling is applied where venue volume is known.
- Trade size is converted to capital using the strategy’s own capital-to-trade-size ratio.
- Capacity is capped at 50× the largest trade actually observed — beyond that we are extrapolating.
- Measured edge exceeded 100bps per trade and was clipped — above that it is directional luck, not repeatable alpha.
- Capped at 50x current capital; beyond that the estimate is unfalsifiable.
- At least one instrument hit the observed-size cap, so the total is a floor rather than an estimate.
| Instrument | Edge | Taker | Median trade | Limit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BNB | 122.8bps | 63% | $894.00 | Edge 122.8bps against 6.7bps of realised cost. |
| ASTER | 106.2bps | 74% | $999.00 | Limited by market share: 10% of 20M daily volume across 16 trades a day. |
| FARTCOIN | 82.1bps | 60% | $786.00 | Limited by market share: 10% of 30M daily volume across 24 trades a day. |
| SUI | 59.1bps | 83% | $1.0k | Edge 59.1bps against 8.2bps of realised cost. |
| PUMP | 42.6bps | 98% | $1.0k | Edge 42.6bps against 9.1bps of realised cost. |
| ENA | 21.5bps | 66% | $718.00 | Edge 21.5bps against 6.3bps of realised cost. |
| STBL | 131.4bps | 72% | $299.00 | Limited by market share: 10% of 0M daily volume across 13 trades a day. |
| BTC | -69.4bps | 78% | $4.5k | No positive edge observed — capacity is not the binding constraint here. |
Who is in it
as at 2026-08-23 19:26Largest wallet
100.0%
Top five
100.0%
Concentration
1.000
Wallets seen
1
| # | Wallet | Deposited | Share | All-time P&L | In for |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Leader | $45.9k | 100.0% | -$45.5k | 580d |
Shares are of the capital we can observe, not of reported TVL ($43.6k) — dividing by a total that includes wallets outside our sample would understate every share and make concentration look better than it is.
Money in and out
Ledger read 27 hours agoIn
$695.8k
14 deposits
Out
$0.00
0 withdrawals
Net
$695.8k
1596.9% of TVL
Window
340d
last 14 movements
| When | Type | Amount | Of vault | Transaction |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-12-26 09:50 | deposit | $10.0k | 22.95% | 0xae73a4fc…fc58 |
| 2025-12-05 15:54 | deposit | $20.0k | 45.90% | 0x987ce3f9…6682 |
| 2025-11-16 11:02 | deposit | $10.0k | 22.95% | 0x6a826854…0039 |
| 2025-11-16 10:39 | deposit | $10.0k | 22.95% | 0x72186360…f2a1 |
| 2025-09-26 07:16 | deposit | $100.0k | 229.51% | 0x1f5107d7…79ca |
| 2025-06-26 16:41 | deposit | $100.0k | 229.51% | 0x7b142145…0e91 |
| 2025-06-22 22:42 | deposit | $32.0k | 73.44% | 0xe7c02b53…93ca |
| 2025-06-22 17:24 | deposit | $20.5k | 47.05% | 0x62fb99d2…2460 |
| 2025-03-17 11:57 | deposit | $18.0k | 41.31% | 0x414da8da…60fd |
| 2025-03-04 11:07 | deposit | $15.0k | 34.43% | 0x3799e162…99ed |
| 2025-03-03 19:30 | deposit | $30.0k | 68.85% | 0x698b3f97…6126 |
| 2025-02-24 16:49 | deposit | $24.3k | 55.83% | 0xec973a43…b652 |
| 2025-02-07 11:13 | deposit | $36.2k | 83.01% | 0x7b846cfa…d141 |
| 2025-01-19 22:47 | deposit | $269.8k | 619.25% | 0x44ec931b…97f4 |
Shares are against the vault’s current size, so an old movement is measured against today rather than against what the vault was then. It is the comparison a reader wants — how much of this vault that was — and it is not the same as the share it represented at the time.
What is still missing
- Operator cohort. We show what the venue still exposes; strategies deleted before we began observing are invisible, and only pre-registration can make a cohort provably complete.
- Gross-to-net waterfall. Returns are venue-reported and not yet decomposed into fees, funding and slippage.
- Off-chain exposure. Anything held on a centralised exchange is invisible to us, so the risk shown is a floor.