Loading
HYPE TO TOP 5
BLONG HYPE SHORT EVERYTHING ELSE UNTIL HYPE IS TOP 5 AND JOB IS DONE
Taking money
Open
TVL
$15.4k
Return
-8.2%
over observed history
Recent
0.0% · 0.0%
30d · 90d · 0.0% over a year
Max drawdown
8.2%
peak to trough
Sortino
—
return per unit of downside risk
History
1.7y
437 observations
Confidence
44%
in these metrics
Value and drawdown
Range
Hover for values. Upper: vault value, with BTC indexed to the same starting capital. Lower: how far below its own peak it was.
No strategy has been declared for this vault
Everything above is reconstructed from public data. A declaration is free, signed from this vault’s own key, and cannot be edited afterwards.Note 28
Passport
Identity
Vault contract0x7948564e…41c1
Network
Hyperliquid
PlatformHyperliquid
OperatorHYPE TO TOP 50xfa9eebe9…2da1
Deposit assetUSDC
Created on-chain2024-12-22
First observed by us2026-08-11
Statuslive
What is deciding
unregisteredStrategy versionNot attested — the operator has not bound this record to a specific version
Model providerNot attested — no model declared
ModelNot attested — no model declared
System prompt hashNot attested — no prompt commitment
Policy hashNot attested — no policy commitment
Inferred modediscretionary (26% confidence)
These fields are empty because nobody has attested them, not because we failed to find them. An operator who registers gets a record that provably cannot be edited after the fact — and a grade no unregistered strategy can reach.
How much to trust this
Provenance gradeBReal capital, readable at the venue — but the operator’s full cohort is unproven.
Machine-managedNot established
Metric confidence44%88 observations over 607 days
RankingNot ranked — insufficient history
Alignment and capacity
Operator’s own share100.0%
Commission10%
Depositor wallets1
Concentration1.00 · largest holder 100%
Estimated capacityNo instrument showed a positive edge against its realised cost.
Net flow 30d$0.00
Where the return came from
Gross realised−$28.8k
Trading fees−$100.43
Net realised−$28.9k
That is -187.60% on the capital the strategy currently runs.
- Slippage is not separated: without a book snapshot at fill time it cannot be measured, so it remains inside gross rather than being estimated.
- Funding is differenced across position snapshots, so it is a flow over the window rather than a level: it counts what changed hands while we were watching and nothing before that. Intervals where a position closed and reopened are refused rather than guessed, which makes the figure a floor.
- Gross realised PnL is not positive, so the cost ratio is not meaningful.
Computed from 121 recorded fills and the funding on currently open positions. It covers the window we have observed, not the vault’s whole life.
How well it executes
from 121 fills over 3.86 daysTaker share 100% by value
Fee rate 3.5bps
Daily turnover $74.4k
Annual fee drag 61.7%
- · Almost entirely taker flow: this strategy pays the spread on nearly every trade, so its edge has to clear that first.
How this vault behaves
from 121 fills over 3.86 daysTiming indicates discretionary management, confidence 26%.
- · No strong automation signature in the timing.
Overnight activity 0%
Hour-of-day evenness 27%
Cadence regularity 0%
Clock alignment 0%
Fills per day 31.4
Instruments 13
Timing only. This says nothing about whether the strategy is any good — a losing bot is still a bot.
How the capacity estimate was reached
- No instrument showed a positive edge against its realised cost.
| Instrument | Edge | Taker | Median trade | Limit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HYPE | -2567.4bps | 100% | $857.00 | No positive edge observed — capacity is not the binding constraint here. |
Who is in it
as at 2026-08-23 19:26Largest wallet
100.0%
Top five
100.0%
Concentration
1.000
Wallets seen
1
| # | Wallet | Deposited | Share | All-time P&L | In for |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Leader | $15.4k | 100.0% | -$30.3k | 609d |
Shares are of the capital we can observe, not of reported TVL ($15.4k) — dividing by a total that includes wallets outside our sample would understate every share and make concentration look better than it is.
Money in and out
Ledger read 30 hours agoNo deposits or withdrawals recorded for this vault. The venue does not report them for every vault, and an absence here is our gap rather than a quiet vault.
What is still missing
- Operator cohort. We show what the venue still exposes; strategies deleted before we began observing are invisible, and only pre-registration can make a cohort provably complete.
- Gross-to-net waterfall. Returns are venue-reported and not yet decomposed into fees, funding and slippage.
- Off-chain exposure. Anything held on a centralised exchange is invisible to us, so the risk shown is a floor.