The contract imposes NO notice period: a redeem settles in the transaction that asks for it. That is not a promise of an instant exit — it is still subject to the vault having the money, which is the liquidity reading and a separate question — but there is no queue, no request step and no lock-up in the contract.
The overall band reads `low` while 2 dimensions read worse: market severe, concentration moderate. The band weighs them against everything else, which is why it can read better without being in conflict.
| Risk | Reads |
|---|
The contract holds 488,148.78 WBNB, read from the chain by its token. At the price we publish that is $351.84M, against the $352.02M shown above.
Only half of this is ours. The quantity comes from the contract and can be checked by anybody; the price comes from defillama:coins, so a wrong price would move both figures together and this would still agree.
49.9% of the capital we can attribute here, or $176.90M, belongs to 122 addresses that also hold an open vault elsewhere, the deepest of them in 43. They can leave all of them on the same morning.
The concentration figure further down is about this vault alone and cannot see this. Dollars are each holder’s share of supply times the vault’s size, so this inherits both readings.
A quoted rate is one input, not a verdict. These are the same seven fields in the same order for every vault, so a high rate and a high rate nobody can withdraw from do not look alike.
$10.0k would be $10.0k , a gain of $0.67, <0.1% over 89 days.
Priced from our first reading 1 days after that date; 2026-07-20, because it is the earliest price we hold rather than one we would have to invent.
Computed from the price of one share, so another depositor arriving is never counted as this strategy’s performance. Fees the venue charges inside the share price are included; anything charged outside it is not. It says what this vault did between two dates and nothing whatever about what it will do next.
Everything above is reconstructed from public data. A declaration is free, signed from this vault’s own key, and cannot be edited afterwards.Note 28
Six questions, and what we hold for each. This is not a score and there is no letter at the end of it: the answers are different kinds of thing and compressing them into one number would hide exactly the part a reader needs. Where we have nothing, the row says so.
One party holds more than one of the roles, or nobody can veto a change once its timelock expires.
We have watched who controls this vault since 2026-08-24 and nothing we record has moved in that window. That is not the same as a vault that has never changed hands: anything before 2026-08-24 predates this platform holding control state at all, and we do not reconstruct it from history.
A vault that is eighty per cent one depositor is a vault whose price can be reset by a single withdrawal, and whose headline TVL says almost nothing about whether anyone else believes in it. Concentration is the risk a return figure never shows, and it moves before the return line does.
See what unlocksAlready a customer? Sign in| In the band |
|---|
| From |
|---|
| Market | Severeworse than the band | Yes | drawdown, crowding |
| Liquidity | Low | Yes | exit |
| Concentration | Moderateworse than the band | Yes | concentration |
| Operating | Low | Yes | consistency |
| Controller | Low | No | who may move the money |
| Evidence | Not read | No | 5 of 5 components read (100% of the weight) |
The levels come from this vault’s own risk components and controller reading. The bars draw them; they are not a second calculation, and there is deliberately no overall figure.
Figures computed from the share price read from the vault contract as we went: 2026-02-16 to 2026-10-15, 471 observations. 30-day window from 2026-09-15, 90-day window from 2026-07-17. Readings from the share price read from the contract at past blocks, reconstructed afterwards (98) exist and are not mixed in: one series, one source.
Amber means the evidence is incomplete, never that the vault is risky, and grey means we did not read it rather than that there is nothing to read. Nothing here is a rating, a recommendation, or a statement that this vault is safe.
These fields are empty because nobody has attested them, not because we failed to find them. An operator who registers gets a record that provably cannot be edited after the fact, and a grade no unregistered strategy can reach.
Attributed collateral only. A vault accepting many collaterals at once reports less here than it holds, so this is what we can attribute rather than everything it is lent against.
10 markets read, $352.13M attributed. 10 did not publish a loan-to-value, shown as a dash rather than as zero. The market by market rows, and this vault’s share of each, are part of the crowding data.