Loading
F*ck U Capital
BTaking money
—
TVL
$13.6k
Return
-28.8%
over observed history
Recent
1.8% · 3.4%
30d · 90d · -22.2% over a year
Max drawdown
37.5%
peak to trough
Sortino
-0.77
return per unit of downside risk
History
1.7y
381 observations
Confidence
45%
in these metrics
Value and drawdown
Range
Hover for values. Upper: vault value, with BTC indexed to the same starting capital. Lower: how far below its own peak it was.
No strategy has been declared for this vault
Everything above is reconstructed from public data. A declaration is free, signed from this vault’s own key, and cannot be edited afterwards.Note 28
Passport
Identity
Vault contract0x4131a368…4a47
Network
Hyperliquid
PlatformHyperliquid
OperatorF*ck U Capital0x297ac6b7…0737
Deposit assetUSDC
Created on-chain2024-12-12
First observed by us2026-08-11
Statuslive
What is deciding
unregisteredStrategy versionNot attested — the operator has not bound this record to a specific version
Model providerNot attested — no model declared
ModelNot attested — no model declared
System prompt hashNot attested — no prompt commitment
Policy hashNot attested — no policy commitment
Inferred modemodel assisted (71% confidence)
These fields are empty because nobody has attested them, not because we failed to find them. An operator who registers gets a record that provably cannot be edited after the fact — and a grade no unregistered strategy can reach.
How much to trust this
Provenance gradeBReal capital, readable at the venue — but the operator’s full cohort is unproven.
Machine-managedNot established
Metric confidence45%89 observations over 614 days
RankingNot ranked — insufficient history
Alignment and capacity
Operator’s own share29.3%
Commission10%
Depositor wallets14
Concentration0.17 · largest holder 29%
Estimated capacity$681.1k ($340.6k–$1.36M) · floor
Net flow 30d$0.00
Where the return came from
Costs exceeded gross profit by 1.0×Gross realised$74.81
Trading fees−$70.13
Funding paid−$5.02
Net realised−$0.34
Unrealised$460.60
Total$460.26
That is 3.38% on the capital the strategy currently runs.
- Slippage is not separated: without a book snapshot at fill time it cannot be measured, so it remains inside gross rather than being estimated.
- Funding is differenced across position snapshots, so it is a flow over the window rather than a level: it counts what changed hands while we were watching and nothing before that. Intervals where a position closed and reopened are refused rather than guessed, which makes the figure a floor.
Computed from 260 recorded fills and the funding on currently open positions. It covers the window we have observed, not the vault’s whole life.
How well it executes
from 260 fills over 87.22 daysTaker share 46% by value
Fee rate 2.88bps
Daily turnover $2.8k
Annual fee drag 2.2%
How this vault behaves
from 260 fills over 87.22 daysTiming indicates model assisted management, confidence 71%.
- · Activity spread evenly across all 24 hours (evenness 0.912).
- · A large share of fills land on minute boundaries.
- · 24 instruments traded concurrently.
Overnight activity 32%
Hour-of-day evenness 91%
Cadence regularity 14%
Clock alignment 65%
Fills per day 3
Instruments 24
Timing only. This says nothing about whether the strategy is any good — a losing bot is still a bot.
Current exposure
1 positions · $3.1k gross · 0.2x the vault's capital| Instrument | Side | Notional | Share | Entry | Unrealised | Leverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RENDER | long | $3.1k | 100% | 1.3 | $460.60 | 5x |
Snapshot taken 2026-08-24 15:49 UTC. A strategy that flips intraday can look flat at every snapshot and still carry risk in between. Click an instrument to see every other vault holding it.
How the capacity estimate was reached
- 1 of 3 instruments showed no positive edge.
- Impact is inferred from this strategy’s own realised cost, not measured against a book.
- A 10% participation ceiling is applied where venue volume is known.
- Trade size is converted to capital using the strategy’s own capital-to-trade-size ratio.
- Capacity is capped at 50× the largest trade actually observed — beyond that we are extrapolating.
- Capped at 50x current capital; beyond that the estimate is unfalsifiable.
- At least one instrument hit the observed-size cap, so the total is a floor rather than an estimate.
| Instrument | Edge | Taker | Median trade | Limit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BTC | 30.1bps | 22% | $960.00 | Edge 30.1bps against 3.9bps of realised cost. |
| NEAR | 45.4bps | 50% | $196.00 | Edge 45.4bps against 5.4bps of realised cost. |
| SOL | -89.2bps | 20% | $633.00 | No positive edge observed — capacity is not the binding constraint here. |
Who is in it
as at 2026-08-24 19:46Largest wallet
29.3%
Top five
74.2%
Concentration
0.169
Wallets seen
14
| # | Wallet | Deposited | Share | All-time P&L | In for |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Leader | $4.0k | 29.3% | -$1.1k | 620d |
| 2 | 0x01c4d6ce…a8ff | $3.3k | 24.2% | -$1.5k | 380d |
| 3 | 0xb14c8892…84d4 | $1.1k | 8.2% | -$388.62 | 402d |
| 4 | 0x8091448e…ab41 | $1.0k | 7.4% | $4.48 | 65d |
| 5 | 0xab229f35…1426 | $696.03 | 5.1% | $3.29 | 67d |
| 6 | 0xd2b35f3b…39a2 | $669.70 | 4.9% | -$330.30 | 397d |
| 7 | 0xa7523f7b…cc84 | $654.76 | 4.8% | -$335.24 | 402d |
| 8 | 0xedc3b83f…3ff9 | $636.22 | 4.7% | -$103.87 | 297d |
| 9 | 0x8b31f2b5…1fac | $401.55 | 3.0% | $1.75 | 65d |
| 10 | 0xe2c4b3a3…4fff | $368.41 | 2.7% | -$131.59 | 380d |
| 11 | 0xd886651c…3b3a | $331.56 | 2.4% | -$168.44 | 402d |
| 12 | 0xd5e0fc64…4760 | $255.68 | 1.9% | -$119.88 | 394d |
| 13 | 0x9d27202d…f681 | $188.91 | 1.4% | -$61.09 | 366d |
| 14 | 0x8ec2d3b7…b209 | $0.00 | 0.0% | -$0.02 | 81d |
Shares are of the capital we can observe, not of reported TVL ($13.6k) — dividing by a total that includes wallets outside our sample would understate every share and make concentration look better than it is.
Money in and out
Ledger read 3 hours agoIn
$18.2k
19 deposits
Out
$0.00
0 withdrawals
Net
$18.2k
133.9% of TVL
Window
337d
last 19 movements
| When | Type | Amount | Of vault | Transaction |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-20 09:52 | deposit | $999.80 | 7.35% | 0x6c403e89…b8d9 |
| 2026-06-20 09:14 | deposit | $399.80 | 2.94% | 0xeee18787…d0f2 |
| 2026-06-18 17:45 | deposit | $692.74 | 5.09% | 0xfbe12b66…d3ef |
| 2026-06-04 19:23 | deposit | $5.78 | 0.04% | 0x4d5b3e66…0eb3 |
| 2026-05-21 18:11 | deposit | $1.6k | 12.13% | 0xd6256f23…a53b |
| 2025-10-31 14:02 | deposit | $740.09 | 5.44% | 0x8cdc1452…8157 |
| 2025-09-28 12:45 | deposit | $999.94 | 7.35% | 0x2b1d4f64…3a00 |
| 2025-08-30 13:55 | deposit | $2.8k | 20.36% | 0x61ba1b12…154b |
| 2025-08-27 12:17 | deposit | $1.0k | 7.60% | 0x2da23a54…29e2 |
| 2025-08-23 12:55 | deposit | $250.00 | 1.84% | 0x13043983…6997 |
| 2025-08-09 09:27 | deposit | $2.0k | 14.70% | 0xcdee1a60…4ff5 |
| 2025-08-09 09:01 | deposit | $500.00 | 3.67% | 0x9dbd4396…b83d |
| 2025-07-26 10:32 | deposit | $375.56 | 2.76% | 0x2bc8cd22…71d9 |
| 2025-07-23 12:49 | deposit | $1.0k | 7.35% | 0x1204eecf…85c5 |
| 2025-07-21 13:28 | deposit | $1.4k | 10.29% | 0xe90519a2…6f73 |
| 2025-07-18 11:03 | deposit | $1.0k | 7.35% | 0x8cfb6d62…c212 |
| 2025-07-18 10:55 | deposit | $500.00 | 3.67% | 0x4beb14e1…3781 |
| 2025-07-18 10:37 | deposit | $1.4k | 10.28% | 0x935051e2…8c56 |
| 2025-07-18 10:34 | deposit | $500.00 | 3.67% | 0x0a4bfe17…4c10 |
Shares are against the vault’s current size, so an old movement is measured against today rather than against what the vault was then. It is the comparison a reader wants — how much of this vault that was — and it is not the same as the share it represented at the time.
The shape of the record
273 completed round tripsRebuilt from the venue’s own open and close labels on every fill. A return figure cannot say whether it came from being right often and small or rarely and large, and those are opposite businesses.
Win rate
49%
Payoff
0.72
Profit factor
0.68
Median hold
19.7h
273 round trips, 49% of them profitable, holding a median 19.7 hours. Average win $68, average loss $95.
What is still missing
- Operator cohort. We show what the venue still exposes; strategies deleted before we began observing are invisible, and only pre-registration can make a cohort provably complete.
- Gross-to-net waterfall. Returns are venue-reported and not yet decomposed into fees, funding and slippage.
- Off-chain exposure. Anything held on a centralised exchange is invisible to us, so the risk shown is a floor.