The contract imposes NO notice period: a redeem settles in the transaction that asks for it. That is not a promise of an instant exit — it is still subject to the vault having the money, which is the liquidity reading and a separate question — but there is no queue, no request step and no lock-up in the contract.
The overall band reads `low` while 2 dimensions read worse: concentration high, controller high. One of those is NOT part of the band at all, so no amount of reading the band would have surfaced it.
| Risk | Reads | In the band | From |
|---|
The contract holds 9,095.47 WEETH, read from the chain by its token. At the price we publish that is $24.30M, against the $24.29M shown above.
Only half of this is ours. The quantity comes from the contract and can be checked by anybody; the price comes from defillama:coins, so a wrong price would move both figures together and this would still agree.
This vault issues one share per unit of the asset and its contract reports exactly as many assets as shares, so the unit price CANNOT move. A flat price here is a fact about the design and not a measurement of performance: any return has to be paid some other way than through the price, and we do not read one. EVERY UNIT OF IT IS SITTING IN THE VAULT AS CASH: nothing has been borrowed from it and nothing is deployed, so there is no interest for it to earn and the flat price is the proof rather than a gap in our reading.
A quoted rate is one input, not a verdict. These are the same seven fields in the same order for every vault, so a high rate and a high rate nobody can withdraw from do not look alike.
$10.0k would be $10.0k , a gain of $0.00, 0.0% over 30 days.
Computed from the price of one share, so another depositor arriving is never counted as this strategy’s performance. Fees the venue charges inside the share price are included; anything charged outside it is not. It says what this vault did between two dates and nothing whatever about what it will do next.
Everything above is reconstructed from public data. A declaration is free, signed from this vault’s own key, and cannot be edited afterwards.Note 28
Six questions, and what we hold for each. This is not a score and there is no letter at the end of it: the answers are different kinds of thing and compressing them into one number would hide exactly the part a reader needs. Where we have nothing, the row says so.
One party holds more than one of the roles, or nobody can veto a change once its timelock expires.
Read over 0 days and no asset movement could be attributed to the manager. That is a reading, not an absence of one, every transfer in the window travelled with a deposit or a withdrawal.
A vault that is eighty per cent one depositor is a vault whose price can be reset by a single withdrawal, and whose headline TVL says almost nothing about whether anyone else believes in it. Concentration is the risk a return figure never shows, and it moves before the return line does.
See what unlocksAlready a customer? Sign in| Market | Low | Yes | drawdown |
| Liquidity | Low | Yes | exit |
| Concentration | Highworse than the band | Yes | concentration |
| Operating | Low | Yes | consistency |
| Controller | Highworse than the band | No | who may move the money |
| Evidence | Not read | No | 4 of 5 components read (76% of the weight) |
The levels come from this vault’s own risk components and controller reading. The bars draw them; they are not a second calculation, and there is deliberately no overall figure.
Figures computed from the share price read from the vault contract as we went: 2026-08-09 to 2026-10-15, 410 observations. 30-day window from 2026-09-15. Readings from the share price read from the contract at past blocks, reconstructed afterwards (29) exist and are not mixed in: one series, one source.
Amber means the evidence is incomplete, never that the vault is risky, and grey means we did not read it rather than that there is nothing to read. Nothing here is a rating, a recommendation, or a statement that this vault is safe.
These fields are empty because nobody has attested them, not because we failed to find them. An operator who registers gets a record that provably cannot be edited after the fact, and a grade no unregistered strategy can reach.
We have watched who controls this vault since 2026-08-24 and nothing we record has moved in that window. That is not the same as a vault that has never changed hands: anything before 2026-08-24 predates this platform holding control state at all, and we do not reconstruct it from history.
Attributed collateral only. A vault accepting many collaterals at once reports less here than it holds, so this is what we can attribute rather than everything it is lent against.