Loading
DaoScience Quant
BDaoScience Quant
One thing worth a look
Patterns in this vault’s record that have more than one explanation. None of them lowers its grade and none of them is a finding of wrongdoing — a ledger cannot separate the readings below, and neither can we.
- The operator holds 100% of this vault themselves.
- Equally consistent with: A manager with their own money at risk, which is usually a good sign. It does mean the return is a personal account’s, not a record of managing anyone else’s.
Measured over the last 30 days, as of 2026-08-24 17:53Z. A pattern that stops is cleared rather than left standing.
Taking money
Open
TVL
$10.4k
Return
-18.3%
over observed history
Recent
—
30d · 90d
Max drawdown
22.6%
the market did not share this one
Sortino
—
return per unit of downside risk
History
17d
358 observations
Confidence
5%
in these metrics
Value and drawdown
Range
Hover for values. Upper: vault value, with BTC indexed to the same starting capital. Lower: how far below its own peak it was.
No strategy has been declared for this vault
Everything above is reconstructed from public data. A declaration is free, signed from this vault’s own key, and cannot be edited afterwards.Note 28
Passport
Identity
Vault contract0x08dcbb77…1818
Network
Hyperliquid
PlatformHyperliquid
OperatorDaoScience Quant0x211ffa28…453f
Deposit assetUSDC
Created on-chain2026-02-17
First observed by us2026-08-11
Statuslive
What is deciding
Where the return came from
Costs consumed 2% of gross profitGross realised$2.5k
Trading fees−$40.15
Funding received$107.83
Net realised$2.5k
Unrealised−$6.7k
Total−$4.1k
That is -39.62% on the capital the strategy currently runs.
- Slippage is not separated: without a book snapshot at fill time it cannot be measured, so it remains inside gross rather than being estimated.
- Funding is differenced across position snapshots, so it is a flow over the window rather than a level: it counts what changed hands while we were watching and nothing before that. Intervals where a position closed and reopened are refused rather than guessed, which makes the figure a floor.
Computed from 249 recorded fills and the funding on currently open positions. It covers the window we have observed, not the vault’s whole life.
How well it executes
from 249 fills over 181.79 daysTaker share 65% by value
Fee rate 3.44bps
Daily turnover $643.00
Annual fee drag 0.8%
How this vault behaves
from 249 fills over 181.79 daysTiming indicates model assisted management, confidence 70%.
- · Activity spread evenly across all 24 hours (evenness 0.949).
Overnight activity 45%
Hour-of-day evenness 95%
Cadence regularity 0%
Clock alignment 48%
Fills per day 1.4
Instruments 9
Timing only. This says nothing about whether the strategy is any good — a losing bot is still a bot.
Nearest liquidation
ZEC rises 30.1% to 1,074.95 — from 826.38 now.
That is the nearest single instrument breaching this account’s maintenance requirement, so it is a ceiling on safety: a market-wide move hits every leg at once and arrives sooner. Computed from the venue’s own margin state at 2026-08-24 21:54Z.
Current exposure
3 positions · $26.9k gross · 2.6x the vault's capital| Instrument | Side | Notional | Share | Entry | Unrealised | Leverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PAXG | long | $8.7k | 32% | 4095.208 | $1.0k | 10x |
How the capacity estimate was reached
- 1 of 5 instruments showed no positive edge.
- Impact is inferred from this strategy’s own realised cost, not measured against a book.
- A 10% participation ceiling is applied where venue volume is known.
- Trade size is converted to capital using the strategy’s own capital-to-trade-size ratio.
- Capacity is capped at 50× the largest trade actually observed — beyond that we are extrapolating.
- Measured edge exceeded 100bps per trade and was clipped — above that it is directional luck, not repeatable alpha.
- Capped at 50x current capital; beyond that the estimate is unfalsifiable.
- At least one instrument hit the observed-size cap, so the total is a floor rather than an estimate.
| Instrument | Edge | Taker | Median trade | Limit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BTC | 441.8bps | 20% | $281.00 | Edge 441.8bps against 4.2bps of realised cost. |
| INJ | 394.5bps | 23% | $155.00 | Edge 394.5bps against 4.2bps of realised cost. |
| PAXG | 55.4bps | 27% | $499.00 | Edge 55.4bps against 4.3bps of realised cost. |
| ETH | 1111.6bps | 20% | $120.00 | Edge 1111.6bps against 4.6bps of realised cost. |
| ADA |
Who is in it
as at 2026-08-24 19:46Largest wallet
99.8%
Top five
100.0%
Concentration
0.995
Wallets seen
7
| # | Wallet | Deposited | Share | All-time P&L | In for |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Leader | $5.6k | 99.8% | -$3.5k | 188d |
| 2 | 0xb4d47c1f…1d0f | $13.97 | 0.2% | -$14.45 | 69d |
Money in and out
Ledger read 3 hours agoIn
$11.5k
12 deposits
Out
$0.00
0 withdrawals
Net
$11.5k
110.3% of TVL
Window
179d
last 12 movements
| When | Type | Amount | Of vault | Transaction |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-19 05:10 | deposit | $5.00 | 0.05% | 0xce0a3125…d9f2 |
| 2026-08-16 14:40 | deposit | $145.04 |
What is still missing
- Operator cohort. We show what the venue still exposes; strategies deleted before we began observing are invisible, and only pre-registration can make a cohort provably complete.
- Gross-to-net waterfall. Returns are venue-reported and not yet decomposed into fees, funding and slippage.
- Off-chain exposure. Anything held on a centralised exchange is invisible to us, so the risk shown is a floor.