Loading
All vaultsThis is my vault, register it
Due-diligence report: complete, dated, with a digest anybody can check
Taking money
—
TVL
$9.29M
Return
not measured
not read as a return: its share price is fixed by construction — the contract mints one share per unit — so the return is not in the price and cannot be read from it
The venue advertises
Performance
Recent
not measured
the share price is not read as a return here
Max drawdown
not measured
the share price never fell more than 0.05% in 95 days
Sortino
—
return per unit of downside risk
Volatility
The record behind these figures
History
95d
over 298 readings from one source. The record below is longer: 303 readings in total (270 watched, 33 reconstructed), and the metrics use one source family rather than mixing them.
Record begins
2026-09-19
the day this vault began has not been read, so how much of its life the record misses cannot be said
Record rests on
Grade B
The whole record is grade B.
Confidence
26%
in these metrics
Six risks, read separately
The same six across every vault we scoreSix risks, read separately
No strategy risk band: too little of this vault could be measured
There is no overall band for these dimensions to disagree with.
Evidence · Not scored · 3 of 5 components read (45% of the weight)
Point at a risk to read what it rests on.
Due-diligence report
- Complete: every section, nothing withheld
- Issued: a digest anybody can check with us
- Dated: every figure with when it was read
- Portable: one file for a committee or a file
This vault's size is proved against its own contract
The contract holds 182,942,767.53 WLFICX, read from the chain by its token. At the price we publish that is $9.26M, against the $9.27M shown above.
How this is read
Only half of this is ours. The quantity comes from the contract and can be checked by anybody; the price comes from defillama:coins, so a wrong price would move both figures together and this would still agree.
This vault has not moved at all
This vault issues one share per unit of the asset and its contract reports exactly as many assets as shares, so the unit price CANNOT move. A flat price here is a fact about the design and not a measurement of performance: any return has to be paid some other way than through the price, and we do not read one. AND NONE OF IT IS HELD HERE: every unit has been deployed somewhere else, so whatever is earned happens downstream of this contract and could never show in its share price. AND ITS OWN HOLDINGS HAVE NOT MOVED AT ALL in 90 days: the same assets and the same shares then as now. That is capital sitting still, which no venue publishes about itself.
This vault deploys into one contract on ethereum, 0x0dbf562b20b633c14ca9db7130b77a9c68f79589. This contract does not derive what it is worth from what it holds: a multisig at 0xc1338e55a765fd98a17d5fd1aed6cf0068c66522 POSTS the figure, with the last posting on 2026-07-30. one posting may move it by at most 200 of the contract’s own units, and a posting is treated as current for 180 days, which is long enough that it is not a freshness control in any practical sense. Those are limits on the POSTING and not checks on the number: nothing in this contract sets it against anything the chain can confirm. So a flat unit price upstream is not evidence that nothing was earned, and a moving one would not be evidence that anything was. It is the reported book value of a strategy whose holdings we cannot see, and whoever holds that key decides it. The last posting is still inside that period.
How much could leave, by amount
Your position
Pick or type an amount to weigh it against both: what the venue says could leave now, and the largest single withdrawal anybody has made here.
How you get outNo notice periodread 2026-11-02
The contract imposes no notice period and no request step: a redeem that succeeds settles in the transaction that asks for it, and it succeeds only if the vault holds enough to pay at that moment, which is the liquidity reading and a separate question.
How this is read
There is no queue and no lock-up in the contract.
There is no exit capacity to read here, and that is the contract rather than a gap in our reading. THE CONTRACT HAS NO EXIT CAPACITY TO READ, and that is a fact about the contract rather than a gap in our reading. Asked what a holder who demonstrably holds shares could withdraw, it returned their whole holding converted, with no liquidity cap inside the answer. Asking again returns the same thing and so would any other reader: there is no figure here that measures what the vault could actually pay. Every unit of this vault’s capital is deployed away from it, and the contract it is deployed into does not derive what it is worth from what it holds: a party at 0xc1338e55a765fd98a17d5fd1aed6cf0068c66522 POSTS the figure, last on 30 July 2026, and a posting stays current for 180 days. Asked what a real holder could withdraw, this vault returned THAT POSTED FIGURE to the unit. What a reader would take for exit capacity here is the number that party entered, converted into shares and back, so publishing it as capacity would be publishing one party’s entry as a measurement of liquidity.
Value and drawdown
This chart shows the last 30 days of a 45 day record; the whole-record figures on this page are measured over all of it, and the 30, 90 and 365-day figures over their own windows, dated below. The rest is the Analyst tierRange
Hover for values. Upper: vault value, with BTC indexed to the same starting capital. Lower: how far below its own peak it was.
The rate, and the seven things that qualify it
A quoted rate is one input, not a verdict.
- Current quoted rate
- Not stated: The rate beside this vault is not a rate anybody advertised. It reaches us from an aggregator that DERIVES it from the share price, and this vault reports exactly as many assets as shares, so its price cannot move and the derived rate is zero by construction rather than by measurement. We publish it as unstated rather than as 0%, because 0% is a claim about the vault and this is a fact about the arithmetic. Whether a holder earns anything here is not answered by either figure: it would be paid some way a share price cannot show, and where the capital went is the question to ask instead.
- Rewards inside that rate
- There is no stated rate for a reward to be part of.
- Realised return
- Not read as a return, because its share price is fixed by construction — the contract mints one share per unit — so the return is not in the price and cannot be read from it.
- Fee basis
- Inside the share price
- Withdrawable now
- The venue publishes no withdrawable figure, so no amount is claimed either way.
- History quality
- 168readings
- What it depends on
- No collateral or control reading for this vault yet.
Share price and yield
Realised yield is the share price's own 30-day return, annualised, with no smoothing.Range
What one share is worth, in CTWLFICX-CORE.
How this is read
It moves only when the strategy earns or loses; deposits do not move it.
Not drawn: its share price is fixed by construction — the contract mints one share per unit — so the return is not in the price and cannot be read from it.
If you had deposited
Not computed: the share price is not read as a return here, because its share price is fixed by construction — the contract mints one share per unit — so the return is not in the price and cannot be read from it.
No strategy has been declared for this vault
Everything above is reconstructed from public data. A declaration is free, signed from this vault’s own key, and cannot be edited afterwards.Note 28
Evidence
What a risk decision about this vault can rest on
Six questions, and what we hold for each.
| Source mark | Question | What we hold | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| What does it hold or lend into? | CTWLFICX-COREThe venue names a deposit asset. What the vault actually holds behind it has not been read. | Declared | |
| How much could leave now? | at least under $0.01 idleOnly the unlent part is known, so this is a floor: at least this much can leave. Idle is not withdrawable, and a queue, a cooldown or a cap can stand between them. | Inferred | |
| Who runs it, and what else have they run? | ConcreteA named operator with a record across every vault they run, including the ones that closed. |
Passport
Identity
Vault contract0x26445aaf…f4763583
NetworkEthereum
Platform
Concrete
Operator
Concrete
Deposit assetCTWLFICX-CORE
Created on-chain—
First observed by us2026-09-19
Who can move the money
ThinOne party holds more than one of the roles, or nobody can veto a change once its timelock expires.
- OwnerCan change the vault.
- 0x8f5f1d40…1bcd3381
- CuratorDecides what it lends against.
- none set
- GuardianCan veto a change while the timelock runs.
- none set
- What holds the keys
- A multisig, 1 signature required
- Notice before a change
- none on this path
- Can be halted
- yes, a pause exists and is off
- Can replace the code
- 0x0265d73a…5516844c
And whether that has changed
What the manager moved
read 2 November 2026, over 30 daysRead over 30 days and no asset movement could be attributed to the manager. That is a reading, not an absence of one, every transfer in the window travelled with a deposit or a withdrawal.
Who is in it, and what moved in and out
Ledger read 3 hours agoAnalyst tier
Who is in this vault, and what moved in and out
Locked here: every depositor we read with their share of the vault, the largest single wallet, and the ledger of each deposit and withdrawal. A vault that is eighty per cent one depositor is a vault whose price can be reset by a single withdrawal, and whose headline TVL says almost nothing about whether anyone else believes in it.
See what unlocksAlready a customer? Sign inWhat is still missing
What this page cannot show yet, and why.
What they are
- Operator cohort. We show what the venue still exposes; strategies deleted before we began observing are invisible, and only pre-registration can make a cohort provably complete.
- Gross-to-net waterfall. Returns are venue-reported and not yet decomposed into fees, funding and slippage.
- Off-chain exposure. Anything held on a centralised exchange is invisible to us, so the risk shown is a floor.