Loading
All vaultsThis is my vault, register it
Catrix-The Ultimate Sleep-to-Earn AI Wealth Engine
Blikely#180 of 202Deposit once, sleep peacefully, wake up richer. True "Sleep-to-Earn" with effortless 100%+ annual yields. Powered by Coinglass, Glassnode, news & on-chain data. Tracks funding rates, OI, liquidations, whale flows & key events in one place.
Taking money
Open
TVL
$13.9k
Return
-6.2%
over its watched history, read on 100 of 297 days, thin enough that the figure is an estimate between readings
The venue advertises
>-0.1%
the share price implies >-0.1% over 28 days, from 39 readings
Its depositors kept
Value and drawdown
This chart shows the last 30 days of a 297 day record; the whole-record figures on this page are measured over all of it, and the 30, 90 and 365-day figures over their own windows, dated below. The rest is the Analyst tierRange
Hover for values. Upper: vault value, with BTC indexed to the same starting capital. Lower: how far below its own peak it was.
The rate, and the seven things that qualify it
A quoted rate is one input, not a verdict. These are the same seven fields in the same order for every vault, so a high rate and a high rate nobody can withdraw from do not look alike.
- Current quoted rate
- >-0.1%As the venue states it, from Hyperliquid. Passed on rather than adopted, and whether rewards are inside it is the next row.
- Rewards inside that rate
- No reward rate is published, so we cannot say whether the quote includes one.A published rate, not a verified payment. Promotional projections and amounts actually accrued are different things and this is the first.
- Realised return
- >-0.1%over 28 daysDerived from the share price we read, over the window stated. Annualisation is secondary: the window is the measurement.
- Fee basis
- Inside the share priceA return derived from the share price is net of whatever the venue already deducted. Fees charged outside it are not in either number.
- Withdrawable now
- $13.7k99% of the vault
Profit, and what the value is made of
Value held less cumulative profit is the money people put in. The venue draws the two apart; the gap is the point.Range
Profit and loss since the vault opened, as the venue reports it. It ignores deposits and withdrawals: only trading moves this line.
Value heldNet money put in
Range
Solid: what the vault holds. Dashed: what depositors put in, net of withdrawals. Where the two rise together the growth was deposits, not performance.
No strategy has been declared for this vault
Everything above is reconstructed from public data. A declaration is free, signed from this vault’s own key, and cannot be edited afterwards.Note 28
Evidence
What a risk decision about this vault can rest on
Six questions, and what we hold for each. This is not a score and there is no letter at the end of it: the answers are different kinds of thing and compressing them into one number would hide exactly the part a reader needs. Where we have nothing, the row says so. 1 of 6 is not measured for this vault.
- What does it hold or lend into?DeclaredUSDCThe venue names a deposit asset. What the vault actually holds behind it has not been read.
- How much could leave now?Measured$13.7kWhat the contract will pay out now, read from it. Not the same as what is idle.
- Who runs it, and what else have they run?MeasuredCatrixA named operator with a record across every vault they run, including the ones that closed.
- What does it depend on?DeclaredHyperliquid on Hyperliquid
Passport
Identity
Analyst tier
Detail is hidden, not absentHow well it executes
Built from 677 individual fills. Two strategies with identical signals can differ by hundreds of basis points purely in how they get filled, taker share, fee rate, slippage. This is the part of a result that is operational competence rather than market view, and it is what tells you whether a good year was skill or a good venue.
See what unlocksAlready a customer? Sign inHow this vault behaves
from 677 fills over 19.22 daysTiming indicates rules automated management, confidence 100%.
- · A large share of fills land on minute boundaries.
Overnight activity 25%
Hour-of-day evenness 81%
Cadence regularity 0%
Clock alignment 53%
Fills per day 35.2
Instruments 1
Timing only. This says nothing about whether the strategy is any good, a losing bot is still a bot.
How the capacity estimate was reached
- No instrument showed a positive edge against its realised cost.
| Instrument | Edge | Taker | Median trade | Limit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BTC | -4.8bps | 99% | $376.00 | No positive edge observed, capacity is not the binding constraint here. |
Who is in it
Money in and out
Ledger read 7 hours agoAnalyst tier
Detail is hidden, not absentWho is in this vault, and how much of it is one wallet
A vault that is eighty per cent one depositor is a vault whose price can be reset by a single withdrawal, and whose headline TVL says almost nothing about whether anyone else believes in it. Concentration is the risk a return figure never shows, and it moves before the return line does.
See what unlocksAlready a customer? Sign inWhat changed the value
nothing decomposed yetThe section above says money moved. This says what the movement WAS. A vault grows because deposits arrived, or because the trading worked, or because it was paid to hold a position, and a size figure renders all three identically.
Nothing can be decomposed for this vault yet: 62 days are held back because a reader has not covered them.
- 1 day: fills have been walked, but not over these days
- 1 day: one end of the day has no position snapshot
- 1 day: the funding ledger has been walked, but not over these days
- 1 day: this vault’s fills have never been walked
The shape of the record
97 completed round tripsRebuilt from the venue’s own open and close labels on every fill. A return figure cannot say whether it came from being right often and small or rarely and large, and those are opposite businesses.
Win rate
42%
Payoff
1.03
Profit factor
0.75
Median hold
38m
97 round trips, 42% of them profitable, holding a median 38 minutes. Average win $68, average loss $66.
What is still missing
- Operator cohort. We show what the venue still exposes; strategies deleted before we began observing are invisible, and only pre-registration can make a cohort provably complete.
- Gross-to-net waterfall. Returns are venue-reported and not yet decomposed into fees, funding and slippage.
- Off-chain exposure. Anything held on a centralised exchange is invisible to us, so the risk shown is a floor.