800 agents tested. 5 years of data. One survivor: RockSteady. Smaller wins, higher frequency, steady compounding. No chasing. No panic. Just discipline. Always on. Powered by Claude. By NuWealth — x.com/nuwealth_ai
No dimension we could read is worse than the overall band of low; 2 were not read (controller, evidence), and this comparison says nothing about them.
Evidence · Not scored · 6 of 6 components read (100% of the weight)
Point at a risk to read what it rests on.
Pick or type an amount to weigh it against both: what the venue says could leave now, and the largest single withdrawal anybody has made here.
The contract imposes no notice period and no request step: a redeem that succeeds settles in the transaction that asks for it, and it succeeds only if the vault holds enough to pay at that moment, which is the liquidity reading and a separate question.
There is no queue and no lock-up in the contract.
A quoted rate is one input, not a verdict.
It ignores deposits and withdrawals: only trading moves this line.
Dashed: what depositors put in, net of withdrawals. Where the two rise together the growth was deposits, not performance.
Everything above is reconstructed from public data. A declaration is free, signed from this vault’s own key, and cannot be edited afterwards.Note 28
Six questions, and what we hold for each. 1 of these 6 questions is not measured for this vault. These are evidence questions, not the risk band’s components, which are counted under the six risks.
| Source mark | Question | What we hold | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| What does it hold or lend into? | USDCThe venue names a deposit asset. What the vault actually holds behind it has not been read. | Declared | |
| How much could leave now? | $8.8kThe venue's reported withdrawable liquidity, not verified as executable: no withdrawal of it was tried, and an ordinary withdrawal by a given holder may get less. Not the same as what is idle. A deposit here is locked: the longest lockup still running across this vault's depositors is 1 day, read from the venue's own per-depositor field on 1 of 22. That is a floor on the term rather than the term, and it is a constraint on the depositor that the vault-level figure above does not carry. | Measured | |
Built from 192 individual fills. Two strategies with identical signals can differ by hundreds of basis points purely in how they get filled, taker share, fee rate, slippage. This is the part of a result that is operational competence rather than market view, and it is what tells you whether a good year was skill or a good venue.
See what unlocksAlready a customer? Sign inTiming indicates model assisted management, confidence 63%.
Timing only. This says nothing about whether the strategy is any good, a losing bot is still a bot.
| Instrument | Side | Notional | Share | Entry | Unrealised | Leverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| long | $720.19 | 100% | 85620 | -$67.51 | 1x |
Snapshot taken 2026-11-04 14:01 UTC. A strategy that flips intraday can look flat at every snapshot and still carry risk in between. Click an instrument to see every other vault holding it.
| Instrument | Edge | Taker | Median trade | Limit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRV | 179.9bps | 100% | $107.00 | Edge 179.9bps against 9.5bps of realised cost. |
Locked here: every depositor we read with their share of the vault, the largest single wallet, and the ledger of each deposit and withdrawal. A vault that is eighty per cent one depositor is a vault whose price can be reset by a single withdrawal, and whose headline TVL says almost nothing about whether anyone else believes in it.
See what unlocksAlready a customer? Sign inThe section above says money moved. This says what the movement WAS. A vault grows because deposits arrived, or because the trading worked, or because it was paid to hold a position, and a size figure renders all three identically.
Nothing can be decomposed for this vault yet: 1 day is held back because a reader has not covered them.
A line that falls is a book that pays to stay where it is.
Rebuilt from the venue’s own open and close labels on every fill. A return figure cannot say whether it came from being right often and small or rarely and large, and those are opposite businesses.
42 round trips, 88% of them profitable, holding a median 16.9 hours. The average win is $15 and the average loss $95, it wins far more often than it loses and loses more when it does. That is the signature of selling optionality, and it produces a clean equity curve until the day it does not.
What this page cannot show yet, and why.
| Risk | Reads | In the band | From |
|---|---|---|---|
| Marketlimited scope: past share-price falls, markets shared with other vaults and, where the vault borrows, distance to liquidation; excludes collateral and borrower credit risk | Low | Yes | drawdown, crowding, liquidation |
| Liquidity | Low | Yes | exit |
| Depositor concentration | Low | Yes | concentration |
| Operatinglimited scope: continuity of the observed record; not a review of operations | Low | Yes | consistency |
| Controller | Not read | No | who may move the money |
| Evidence | Not scored | No | 6 of 6 risk-band components read (100% of the weight) |
The levels come from this vault’s own risk components and controller reading. The bars draw them; they are not a second calculation, and there is deliberately no overall figure.
Low observed risk is not zero risk. Market here is three observed readings: the worst fall in the vault's past share price, how much of its lending shares a market with other vaults we track, and how far its own borrowing is from liquidation. It does not assess the collateral, the borrowers' ability to repay, a concentration in one market (read under where the capital rests), or whether withdrawals hold under stress. The overall band weighs every component together instead, so it can read better than this and is not in conflict with it: a dimension says how bad its worst reading is, the band says what the whole weighs.
Low observed risk is not zero risk. Input: 93.0% of it could be withdrawn at the last reading, from the venue's own withdrawable over account value, from its latest margin reading — We hold what this vault is worth and not what is uninvested, so the two cannot be checked against each other.. The reading 0.00 is one less that share over 25%: a quarter or more free reads 0, nothing free reads 1. The overall band weighs every component together instead, so it can read better than this and is not in conflict with it: a dimension says how bad its worst reading is, the band says what the whole weighs.
Low observed risk is not zero risk. It measures how much of the vault its largest depositor holds, not how much the vault lends into one market; that is the allocation table. Input: largest wallet holds 21%, by the address's position; addresses are not merged by who owns them, and whether the largest is a person, another vault or a custodian is not established. The reading 0.00 is that share less 25%, over 75%: a quarter or less reads 0, the whole vault 1. The overall band weighs every component together instead, so it can read better than this and is not in conflict with it: a dimension says how bad its worst reading is, the band says what the whole weighs.
Low observed risk is not zero risk. The overall band weighs every component together instead, so it can read better than this and is not in conflict with it: a dimension says how bad its worst reading is, the band says what the whole weighs.
Unexamined is not acceptable, and this is not part of the overall band either way.
By weight, 100 of the 100 points that apply were read, which is 100% of the component weight the band could draw on (a different denominator: components are not equally weighted). This is a statement about our coverage and carries no level of its own, because how much we could read is not a risk the vault runs.
These are the same seven fields in the same order for every vault, so a high rate and a high rate nobody can withdraw from do not look alike.
| Who runs it, and what else have they run? |
| Agent RockSteadyA named operator with a record across every vault they run, including the ones that closed. |
| Measured |
| What does it depend on? | Hyperliquid on HyperliquidThe venue and the chain are known; what the strategy routes into underneath them has not been read. | Declared |
| Who can change it, and how fast? | —Access control has not been read for this vault. Who can move the money, and how quickly, is unknown. That is not the same as nobody being able to. | Not measured |
| How much of the above was measured? | 2 of 5 not measuredCounted from the rows above rather than asserted. Every figure on this page carries when it was read and what it was read from; the gaps are listed on /reconciliation with their size. | Measured |
This is not a score and there is no letter at the end of it: the answers are different kinds of thing and compressing them into one number would hide exactly the part a reader needs. Where we have nothing, the row says so.
The mark says where an answer came from, never whether it is good: a filled circle is a reading we made, a half circle an inference from readings we hold, quotation marks what the venue or operator states, and a dashed ring means we did not read it rather than that there is nothing to read.
Nothing here is a rating, a recommendation, or a statement that this vault is safe.
These fields are empty because nobody has attested them, not because we failed to find them.
An operator who registers gets a record that provably cannot be edited after the fact, and a grade no unregistered strategy can reach.