⌘K

Live evidencecounted 22m ago

0.71days of PURR volume to unwind the crowd98%of the XMR book on one side, across 30 vaults$1.35Bunder one key with no guardian, 54 of the 430 vaults whose control we have read$307.4Mwhose control we have never read, across 3,271 vaults$1.98Bsitting in vaults and not lent out$11.39Bunder 3,701 vaults we read$4.81Bin 326 vaults where we saw automated execution, nothing declared2,127vaults declared or on a venue built to run software, holding $992.7k328software-run vaults scored, 13% of them453operators identified behind them26networks where we read capital, from Ethereum to Cardano31,521,227deposits and withdrawals read from chain124changes recorded in the last day601,849ERC-8004 agent registrations read−0.53/ 30 days370,517distinct owners behind those registrations201,164registrations carrying a readable card, 33%3,348,162paid requests on the Olas rail (deliveries are counted apart)−0.66/ 30 days87suppliers delivering that work411,662agent-to-agent jobs read on Base+0.08/ 30 days$1.0Msettled between agents, all time1,176suppliers listed on the ACP rail189agents live on Cardano76Cardano agents deregistered, 29% of all ever minted29,273escrows between Cardano agents since Jun 2025, 152 still open78%of every agent payment we read comes from 2,691 addresses that never stop316,513addresses paid once and never came back, of 523,189 that ever paid976of those payers are an agent we can name, 0.187% of them654agent hosts answered when we asked, of 2,548 probed17,118agents sit behind a host that answers nothing at all354msmedian answer from the 654 hosts that answer44%of all agent ratings were written by ten addresses, of 677,594 ratings read29,616rated agents have exactly one rater, of 47,447 rated at all96,497service endpoints declared across 39,516 agent cards we read0.71days of PURR volume to unwind the crowd98%of the XMR book on one side, across 30 vaults$1.35Bunder one key with no guardian, 54 of the 430 vaults whose control we have read$307.4Mwhose control we have never read, across 3,271 vaults$1.98Bsitting in vaults and not lent out$11.39Bunder 3,701 vaults we read$4.81Bin 326 vaults where we saw automated execution, nothing declared2,127vaults declared or on a venue built to run software, holding $992.7k328software-run vaults scored, 13% of them453operators identified behind them26networks where we read capital, from Ethereum to Cardano31,521,227deposits and withdrawals read from chain124changes recorded in the last day601,849ERC-8004 agent registrations read−0.53/ 30 days370,517distinct owners behind those registrations201,164registrations carrying a readable card, 33%3,348,162paid requests on the Olas rail (deliveries are counted apart)−0.66/ 30 days87suppliers delivering that work411,662agent-to-agent jobs read on Base+0.08/ 30 days$1.0Msettled between agents, all time1,176suppliers listed on the ACP rail189agents live on Cardano76Cardano agents deregistered, 29% of all ever minted29,273escrows between Cardano agents since Jun 2025, 152 still open78%of every agent payment we read comes from 2,691 addresses that never stop316,513addresses paid once and never came back, of 523,189 that ever paid976of those payers are an agent we can name, 0.187% of them654agent hosts answered when we asked, of 2,548 probed17,118agents sit behind a host that answers nothing at all354msmedian answer from the 654 hosts that answer44%of all agent ratings were written by ten addresses, of 677,594 ratings read29,616rated agents have exactly one rater, of 47,447 rated at all96,497service endpoints declared across 39,516 agent cards we read

Economic profile

0x509e55c4f898b43c856fb0e51048b1b7bfbc9edethe full record as JSON

Revenue quality

Who pays it, how often, and are they separate parties

Dealings

Buyers

5 new in 90 days

Priced

$1.15

where a rail priced it

Came back

60%

3 of 5

Largest buyer

53%

of its dealings

Paid it back

money went both ways

Payers sharing a party

—

not tested

Last 30 days

dealings

15 dealings with 5 buyers, $1.15 of it priced. 3 buyers came back, which is 60% of them: a business that is bought from twice is a different thing from one that is tried once. Its largest buyer is 53% of its dealings, so most of this record rests on one relationship.

This address has taken no ACP job we hold, so there is no delivery record here. It may deliver on a rail we do not read, or under an agreement no chain carries.

Economic dependencies

Who it rests on, and on what evidence

What they are	Paid	How we know
Named as a provider	—	a protocol named them the provider of a job: an ACP job taken, or a Masumi escrow they were the seller of
Publishes something for sale	—	they publish a paid resource in the x402 catalogue and this address paid them; that the payment bought that resource is not proven
Paid, nothing more known	—	money reached them and nothing we read says they sell anything: a relayer, a bridge, a refund and a salary are indistinguishable here

This address has paid nobody on a rail we read. That is not "it depends on nobody": a model, an endpoint, a host and a key are dependencies we cannot see.

Operating health

Do its endpoints answer, and is it still trading

Endpoints listed

0 knocked on

Answered with a price

Gone or silent

Last dealing

today

It lists 3 endpoints and we have knocked on none of them yet, so this says nothing about whether they answer. Its most recent dealing we read is from today.

What none of this can see

revenue that never touched a rail we read: an invoice, a bank transfer, a private agreement
the dependencies that are not payments: a model, a host, an endpoint, an API key, a person
whether a completed job was any good; we can say who signed it off, not what they received
anything about the operator behind the address, beyond what the chain and the catalogue say

There is no score on this page and there will not be one. A single figure would be the thing everybody quotes and the only thing nobody can check, and it would average a measured quantity with an unmeasured one until neither is visible.