Everything read on this venue, and what has not been. Figures are ours unless a line says a venue reported them.
Users act on every vault. Whether the vault acts, moving assets when nobody deposited or withdrew, is a separate reading, and it is what separates a managed strategy from a container.
Not read yet. We have this venue’s deposits and withdrawals, which are things done to a vault; what its manager does has not been looked at. That is a gap in our reading and not a finding about the venue.
How much of the capital on Fusion by IPOR sits under a vault an agent runs, and what stands behind each answer.
$0 of $58.3M is under a vault we have reason to call agent-managed; 0.0% of the capital, in 0 of 33 vaults.
| Who can move it | Capital | Share | Vaults |
|---|---|---|---|
| Not agent-managed | $58.3M | 100.0% | 33 vaults |
Each vault counts in one band only, its strongest evidence, hover a band for what stands behind it.
Composition
Networks, not vaults. How a venue spreads across chains is a shape; which vault sits on which chain is the register below, and that is the paid half.
The party the venue names as curator or manager, where one is named. A venue is a place; an operator is somebody making decisions in it.
| Operator | Vaults | Capital |
|---|---|---|
| 33 | $58.32M |
The underlying asset each vault reports. ‘Not read’ is a vault whose asset we have not established, which is different from one holding nothing.
| Asset | Vaults | Capital |
|---|---|---|
| not read | 33 | $58.32M |
| Vault | Network | Capital | APY | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ethereum | $16.15M | 2.6% | — | |
| Base | $10.05M | 1.2% | — | |
| Base | $6.52M | 2.1% | — | |
The venue’s own published size is $75.88M against the $58.32M we hold across 33 vaults. The two measure different things, theirs is the whole protocol, ours is the vaults we track, and the gap is our coverage rather than a disagreement.
Capital and yield are as the venue or an aggregator reports them unless a vault’s own page says it was read from the contract. Nothing on this page is a recommendation, and a venue appearing here is not an endorsement of it.
| Base |
| $6.06M |
| 3.2% |
| — |
| Ethereum | $5.38M | 4.3% | — |
| Base | $4.57M | 4.4% | — |
| Base | $2.55M | 4.5% | — |
| Ethereum | $1.28M | 6.5% | — |
| Base | $1.06M | 4.1% | — |
| Ethereum | $698.7k | 13.0% | — |
| Ethereum | $634.1k | 7.8% | — |
| Ethereum | $468.6k | 4.3% | — |
| Ethereum | $261.9k | 3.6% | — |
| Base | $241.4k | 4.4% | — |
| Arbitrum | $239.9k | 3.1% | — |
| Ethereum | $220.8k | 0.0% | — |
| Ethereum | $219.5k | 8.0% | — |
| Arbitrum | $203.3k | 1.0% | — |
| Base | $192.8k | 5.1% | — |
| Ethereum | $161.6k | 0.0% | — |
| Ethereum | $143.4k | 0.0% | — |
| Base | $141.6k | 5.7% | — |
| Ethereum | $123.1k | 16.3% | — |
| Ethereum | $117.4k | 6.0% | — |
| Base | $94.4k | 1.4% | — |
| Ethereum | $89.8k | 0.0% | — |
| Base | $85.0k | 0.9% | — |
| Ethereum | $74.9k | 3.3% | — |
| Ethereum | $58.3k | 7.2% | — |
| Base | $57.9k | 0.1% | — |
| Base | $56.2k | 4.6% | — |
| Ethereum | $55.9k | 0.0% | — |
| Base | $52.7k | 5.0% | — |