Re Ecosystem Vault exclusively allocates to assets related to the re.xyz ecosystem. Find more info about Re on their website re.xyz
There is no overall band for these dimensions to disagree with.
Evidence · Not scored · 2 of 5 components read (36% of the weight)
Point at a risk to read what it rests on.
The contract holds 651,392.94 USDC, read from the chain by its token. At the price we publish that is $650.9k, against the $651.0k shown above.
Pick or type an amount to weigh it against both: what the venue says could leave now, and the largest single withdrawal anybody has made here.
$650,947 of this vault's $650,958 is not lent to a borrower, which is within the books as they stand.
A quoted rate is one input, not a verdict.
It moves only when the strategy earns or loses; deposits do not move it.
Dashed: what the venue advertised, 0 recorded by us since we began and 29 from the venue’s own published history.
Everything above is reconstructed from public data. A declaration is free, signed from this vault’s own key, and cannot be edited afterwards.Note 28
Six questions, and what we hold for each. 1 of 6 is not measured for this vault.
| Source mark | Question | What we hold | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| What does it hold or lend into? | 1 collateral read, $650.9k supplied, across 2 marketsRead from the vault’s own holdings. Concentration and the assets themselves are below. Its largest single market holds 100% of what anybody has supplied there. | Measured | |
| How much could leave now? | $650.9kWhat the contract will pay out now, read from it. Not the same as what is idle. | Measured | |
| Who runs it, and what else have they run? | ClearstarA named operator with a record across every vault they run, including the ones that closed. | Measured |
Attributed collateral only.
A vault accepting many collaterals at once reports less here than it holds, so this is what we can attribute rather than everything it is lent against.
Locked here: every depositor we read with their share of the vault, the largest single wallet, and the ledger of each deposit and withdrawal. A vault that is eighty per cent one depositor is a vault whose price can be reset by a single withdrawal, and whose headline TVL says almost nothing about whether anyone else believes in it.
See what unlocksAlready a customer? Sign inWhat this page cannot show yet, and why.
| Risk | Reads | In the band | From |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market | Not read | Yes | nothing fed it |
| Liquidity | Low | Yes | exit |
| Concentration | Severe | Yes | concentration |
| Operating | Not read | Yes | nothing fed it |
| Controller | Not read | No | who may move the money |
| Evidence | Not scored | No | 2 of 5 components read (36% of the weight) |
The levels come from this vault’s own risk components and controller reading. The bars draw them; they are not a second calculation, and there is deliberately no overall figure.
That is our coverage, not a finding.
The overall band weighs every component together instead, so it can read better than this and is not in conflict with it: a dimension says how bad its worst reading is, the band says what the whole weighs.
Unexamined is not acceptable, and THIS IS NOT PART OF THE OVERALL BAND either way.
This is a statement about our coverage and carries no level of its own, because how much we could read is not a risk the vault runs.
These are the same seven fields in the same order for every vault, so a high rate and a high rate nobody can withdraw from do not look alike.
| What does it depend on? | Morpho Vaults V2 on MonadThe venue and the chain are known; what the strategy routes into underneath them has not been read. | Declared |
| Who can change it, and how fast? | —Access control has not been read for this vault. Who can move the money, and how quickly, is unknown. That is not the same as nobody being able to. | Not measured |
| How much of the above was measured? | 1 of 5 not measuredCounted from the rows above rather than asserted. Every figure on this page carries when it was read and what it was read from; the gaps are listed on /reconciliation with their size. | Measured |
This is not a score and there is no letter at the end of it: the answers are different kinds of thing and compressing them into one number would hide exactly the part a reader needs. Where we have nothing, the row says so.
The mark says where an answer came from, never whether it is good: a filled circle is a reading we made, a half circle an inference from readings we hold, quotation marks what the venue or operator states, and a dashed ring means we did not read it rather than that there is nothing to read.
Nothing here is a rating, a recommendation, or a statement that this vault is safe.
These fields are empty because nobody has attested them, not because we failed to find them.
An operator who registers gets a record that provably cannot be edited after the fact, and a grade no unregistered strategy can reach.
Band width is dollars on one scale. Attributed supply only: a vault in many markets at once reports less here than it holds.
2 markets read, $650.9k attributed. The market by market rows, and this vault’s share of each, are part of the crowding data.