Loading
All vaults
Makina · LOOPCUSHY
evidence grade CDue-diligence report: complete, dated, with a digest anybody can check
- Worst risk read
- no risk dimension read for this vault
- Not assessed
- market, liquidity, depositor concentration, operating, controller
- Getting out
- the venue reports no withdrawable figure; no withdrawal simulated
- Readings
- capital read 5 November 2026, 23:45 UTC from aggregator
Execution pattern
No automation observed
evidence: none · not who sets the strategy
Taking money
—
TVL
$200.0k
Return
Performance
Recent
—
30d · 90d
Max drawdown
—
peak to trough
Sortino
—
return per unit of downside risk
Volatility
—
The record behind these figures
History
—
1 readings, all taken at the time
Deployed
not established
not read yet
Record begins
2026-11-05
the day this vault began has not been read, so how much of its life the record misses cannot be said
Record rests on
Grade C
The whole record is grade C.
Confidence
0%
Six risks, read separately
The same six across every vault we scoreSix risks, read separately
No strategy risk band: too little of this vault could be measured
There is no overall band for these dimensions to disagree with.
Evidence · Not scored · 0 of 5 components read (0% of the weight)
Point at a risk to read what it rests on.
Due-diligence report
- Complete: every section, nothing withheld
- Issued: a digest anybody can check with us
- Dated: every figure with when it was read
- Portable: one file for a committee or a file
Value and drawdown
Not enough history to plot. We need at least two NAV observations.
The rate, and the seven things that qualify it
A quoted rate is one input, not a verdict.
- Advertised rate
- 0.0%
- Rewards on top of the base rate
- 0.0%paid in tokens, outside the share price
- Realised return
- Too little share-price history to derive one. The quote stands alone until there is.
- Fee basis
- We do not read this vault’s share price, so we cannot say which fees the figure is net of.
- Withdrawable now
- The venue publishes no withdrawable figure, so no amount is claimed either way.
- History quality
- No value series, so there is nothing to state a realised return from.
- What it depends on
- No shared-collateral reading and no risk score for this vault yet; who controls it is read separately, below.
How these are read
These are the same seven fields in the same order for every vault, so a high rate and a high rate nobody can withdraw from do not look alike.
No strategy has been declared for this vault
Everything above is reconstructed from public data. A declaration is free, signed from this vault’s own key, and cannot be edited afterwards.Note 28
Evidence
What a risk decision about this vault can rest on
Six questions, and what we hold for each. 2 of these 6 questions are not measured for this vault. These are evidence questions, not the risk band’s components, which are counted under the six risks.
| Source mark | Question | What we hold | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| What does it hold or lend into? | LOOPCUSHYThe venue names a deposit asset. What the vault actually holds behind it has not been read. | Declared | |
| How much could leave now? | —No exit reading. This is the figure that decides whether a position can be left, and we do not have it. | Not measured | |
| Who runs it, and what else have they run? |
Passport
Who is in it, and what moved in and out
Last read: not recordedAnalyst tier
Who is in this vault, and what moved in and out
Locked here: every depositor we read with their share of the vault, the largest single wallet, and the ledger of each deposit and withdrawal. A vault that is eighty per cent one depositor is a vault whose price can be reset by a single withdrawal, and whose headline TVL says almost nothing about whether anyone else believes in it.
See what unlocksAlready a customer? Sign inWhat is still missing
What this page cannot show yet, and why.
What they are
- Operator cohort. We show what the venue still exposes; strategies deleted before we began observing are invisible, and only pre-registration can make a cohort provably complete.
- Gross-to-net waterfall. Returns are venue-reported and not yet decomposed into fees, funding and slippage.
- Off-chain exposure. Anything held on a centralised exchange is invisible to us, so the risk shown is a floor.