ASPERN · due-diligence report
Lagoon · FXLOOP
Lagoon · ethereum · lagoon-fxloop-8ce2da
Generated 2026-10-21 19:43:10 UTC. Every figure below carries the moment it was read, because a report is read later than it is made. Nothing here is a recommendation to invest. The live page carries the same readings and moves with them.
What it holds
How you get out
Getting out is a REQUEST, not a withdrawal: the contract takes an ERC-7540 redeem request and pays it when it settles. It names no period, so how long settlement takes is the operator’s to decide and we cannot read it. The contract will also tell you where you stand: it answers what of yours is still pending and what has settled and is waiting to be claimed. A liquidity figure does not answer this question.
Six risks, read separately
This is the 605th different vault read from here today, and the allowance at this level is 50. Past that a caller is not checking a vault any more, they are reading the population, and the population is the product: the risk screen covers every vault at once, filtered and sorted and compared. Nothing is slowed down and nothing else on this answer is withheld. Vaults already read today stay open whatever the count, because coming back to a vault you are considering is exactly what this allowance is for.
What it advertised and what it returned
The published ratio divides the realised rate by the rate this vault quotes TODAY. Over 7 of the 13 days the return covers we hold its own quotes, it advertised between 18.78% and 28.27%, averaging 24.79%, and today's quote is near the TOP of that range, so the published ratio is built on one of this vault's better quotes. We hold no quote for the rest of the window, so this says what the venue was advertising while we watched and not across the whole return.
Who controls it, and whether that has changed
Not read for this vault.
We have watched who controls this vault since 2026-10-14 and nothing we record has moved in that window. That is not the same as a vault that has never changed hands: anything before 2026-10-14 predates this platform holding control state at all, and we do not reconstruct it from history.
What we cannot see
- · The realised return is not comparable with the advertised one (too-little-history), so the ratio is not a verdict on the venue's figure.
- · The risk band rests on 45% of its components; the rest could not be measured for this vault.
- · Whether it still takes deposits is not something we could establish.
- · Who can move the money: we have not read this vault’s owner, curator or controller on chain, so nothing here says whether one key could empty it.