Getting out is a REQUEST, not a withdrawal: the contract takes an ERC-7540 redeem request and pays it when it settles. It names no period, so how long settlement takes is the operator’s to decide and we cannot read it. The contract will also tell you where you stand: it answers what of yours is still pending and what has settled and is waiting to be claimed. A liquidity figure does not answer this question.
The exit is read, and not on this contract. Leaving here is request-and-claim, so the selector that reports withdrawable capacity answers a different question: what a SETTLED request has set aside for one holder, not what the vault could pay. The constraint on getting out is the queue and the wait rather than a capacity figure, which is read under `exitPhases`.
There is no overall band for these dimensions to disagree with.
| Risk | Reads | In the band | From |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market |
The contract holds 108,317.94 USDC, read from the chain by its token. At the price we publish that is $108.3k, against the $108.3k shown above.
Only half of this is ours. The quantity comes from the contract and can be checked by anybody; the price comes from defillama:coins, so a wrong price would move both figures together and this would still agree.
Over 7 daily readings it has ranged from 18.78% to 28.27%, averaging 24.79%. The tile below shows today’s quote alone.
7 readings is 7 days, not a year. We began taking them on 2026-09-19 and this window grows with the record rather than standing in for a longer one.
A quoted rate is one input, not a verdict. These are the same seven fields in the same order for every vault, so a high rate and a high rate nobody can withdraw from do not look alike.
Everything above is reconstructed from public data. A declaration is free, signed from this vault’s own key, and cannot be edited afterwards.Note 28
Six questions, and what we hold for each. This is not a score and there is no letter at the end of it: the answers are different kinds of thing and compressing them into one number would hide exactly the part a reader needs. Where we have nothing, the row says so. 2 of 6 are not measured for this vault.
A vault that is eighty per cent one depositor is a vault whose price can be reset by a single withdrawal, and whose headline TVL says almost nothing about whether anyone else believes in it. Concentration is the risk a return figure never shows, and it moves before the return line does.
See what unlocksAlready a customer? Sign in| Yes |
| drawdown |
| Liquidity | Not read | Yes | nothing fed it |
| Concentration | Severe | Yes | concentration |
| Operating | Not read | Yes | nothing fed it |
| Controller | Not read | No | who may move the money |
| Evidence | Not read | No | 2 of 5 components read (45% of the weight) |
The levels come from this vault’s own risk components and controller reading. The bars draw them; they are not a second calculation, and there is deliberately no overall figure.
Figures computed from the share price read from the vault contract as we went: 2026-10-08 to 2026-10-20, 38 observations. No fixed window is long enough to compute yet. Readings from the share price read from the contract at past blocks, reconstructed afterwards (7) exist and are not mixed in: one series, one source.
Amber means the evidence is incomplete, never that the vault is risky, and grey means we did not read it rather than that there is nothing to read. Nothing here is a rating, a recommendation, or a statement that this vault is safe.
These fields are empty because nobody has attested them, not because we failed to find them. An operator who registers gets a record that provably cannot be edited after the fact, and a grade no unregistered strategy can reach.