SEVERE liquidity and concentration risk on this vault, against an overall band of high.
The contract holds 303,072.03 USDC, read from the chain by its token. At the price we publish that is $302.9k, against the $302.9k shown above.
Over 40 daily readings it has ranged from 6.65% to 13.67%, averaging 12.26%. The tile above shows today’s quote alone.
100.0% of the capital we can attribute here, or $302.8k, belongs to 3 addresses that also hold an open vault elsewhere, the deepest of them in 47. They can leave all of them on the same morning.
Pick or type an amount to weigh it against both: what the venue says could leave now, and the largest single withdrawal anybody has made here.
Getting out is a REQUEST, not a withdrawal: the contract takes an ERC-7540 redeem request and pays it when it settles.
It names no period, so how long settlement takes is the operator’s to decide and we cannot read it. The contract will also tell you where you stand: it answers what of yours is still pending and what has settled and is waiting to be claimed. A liquidity figure does not answer this question.
The exit is read, and not on this contract. Leaving here is request-and-claim, so the selector that reports withdrawable capacity answers a different question: what a SETTLED request has set aside for one holder, not what the vault could pay. The constraint on getting out is the queue and the wait rather than a capacity figure, which is read under `exitPhases`.
A quoted rate is one input, not a verdict.
It moves only when the strategy earns or loses; deposits do not move it.
Dashed: what the venue advertised, all recorded by us, which we began on 2026-09-19.
$10.0k would be $10.0k , a gain of $46.74, 0.5% over 30 days.
Computed from the price of one share, so another depositor arriving is never counted as this strategy’s performance. Fees the venue charges inside the share price are included; anything charged outside it is not. It says what this vault did between two dates and nothing whatever about what it will do next.
Everything above is reconstructed from public data. A declaration is free, signed from this vault’s own key, and cannot be edited afterwards.Note 28
Six questions, and what we hold for each. 1 of 6 is not measured for this vault.
| Source mark | Question | What we hold | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| What does it hold or lend into? | 9SICUSDCThe venue names a deposit asset. What the vault actually holds behind it has not been read. | Declared | |
| How much could leave now? | $24.87 idle, by request onlyOnly the unlent part is known, and here it is not a door at all: leaving this vault means filing a request and waiting for it to be settled, so this is what a request would be settled from rather than an amount anybody can take today. | Inferred | |
| Who runs it, and what else have they run? |
1 transaction moved assets on the vault’s own account, across 1 token.
Counted as manager activity because the transaction carried neither a deposit nor a withdrawal. 0 further transfers travelled with somebody’s own money and are not counted here. A transfer is not a trade: this says the contract acted, not that it acted well.
Locked here: every depositor we read with their share of the vault, the largest single wallet, and the ledger of each deposit and withdrawal. A vault that is eighty per cent one depositor is a vault whose price can be reset by a single withdrawal, and whose headline TVL says almost nothing about whether anyone else believes in it.
See what unlocksAlready a customer? Sign inWhat this page cannot show yet, and why.
The band weighs them against everything else, which is why it can read better without being in conflict.
Evidence · Not scored · 4 of 5 components read (76% of the weight)
Point at a risk to read what it rests on.
| Risk | Reads | In the band | From |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market | Low | Yes | drawdown |
| Liquidity | Severeworse than the band | Yes | exit |
| Concentration | Severeworse than the band | Yes | concentration |
| Operating | Low | Yes | consistency |
| Controller | Not read | No | who may move the money |
| Evidence | Not scored | No | 4 of 5 components read (76% of the weight) |
The levels come from this vault’s own risk components and controller reading. The bars draw them; they are not a second calculation, and there is deliberately no overall figure.
The overall band weighs every component together instead, so it can read better than this and is not in conflict with it: a dimension says how bad its worst reading is, the band says what the whole weighs.
Unexamined is not acceptable, and THIS IS NOT PART OF THE OVERALL BAND either way.
This is a statement about our coverage and carries no level of its own, because how much we could read is not a risk the vault runs.
Figures computed from the share price read from the vault contract as we went: 2026-09-15 to 2026-10-29, 265 observations. 30-day window from 2026-09-29. Readings from the share price read from the contract at past blocks, reconstructed afterwards (7) exist and are not mixed in: one series, one source.
These are the same seven fields in the same order for every vault, so a high rate and a high rate nobody can withdraw from do not look alike.
| LagoonA named operator with a record across every vault they run, including the ones that closed. |
| Measured |
| What does it depend on? | Lagoon on EthereumThe venue and the chain are known; what the strategy routes into underneath them has not been read. | Declared |
| Who can change it, and how fast? | —Access control has not been read for this vault. Who can move the money, and how quickly, is unknown. That is not the same as nobody being able to. | Not measured |
| How much of the above was measured? | 2 of 5 not measuredCounted from the rows above rather than asserted. Every figure on this page carries when it was read and what it was read from; the gaps are listed on /reconciliation with their size. | Measured |
This is not a score and there is no letter at the end of it: the answers are different kinds of thing and compressing them into one number would hide exactly the part a reader needs. Where we have nothing, the row says so.
The mark says where an answer came from, never whether it is good: a filled circle is a reading we made, a half circle an inference from readings we hold, quotation marks what the venue or operator states, and a dashed ring means we did not read it rather than that there is nothing to read.
Nothing here is a rating, a recommendation, or a statement that this vault is safe.
These fields are empty because nobody has attested them, not because we failed to find them.
An operator who registers gets a record that provably cannot be edited after the fact, and a grade no unregistered strategy can reach.