SharpByte USDT Prime

Market.

Market risk reads severe, set by its worst component (worst fall suffered, shared exposure) over the record we hold.

Liquidity.

Liquidity risk reads low, set by its worst component (could you get out) over the record we hold.

Depositor concentration.

Depositor concentration risk reads severe, set by its worst component (largest depositor) over the record we hold.

Operating.

Operating risk reads low, set by its worst component (stopped operating) over the record we hold.

Controller.

A single party can act alone.

Evidence.

5 of the 5 risk components that apply to this vault carried a reading (liquidation does not apply to this kind of vault).

Market here is two observed readings: the worst fall in the vault's past share price and how much of its lending shares a market with other vaults we track. It does not assess the collateral, the borrowers' ability to repay, a concentration in one market (read under where the capital rests), or whether withdrawals hold under stress. The overall band weighs every component together instead, so it can read better than this and is not in conflict with it: a dimension says how bad its worst reading is, the band says what the whole weighs.

Low observed risk is not zero risk. Input: 100.0% of it could be withdrawn at the last reading: declared withdrawable $100,033 over capital $100,037. The reading 0.00 is one less that share over 25%: a quarter or more free reads 0, nothing free reads 1. The overall band weighs every component together instead, so it can read better than this and is not in conflict with it: a dimension says how bad its worst reading is, the band says what the whole weighs.

It measures how much of the vault its largest depositor holds, not how much the vault lends into one market; that is the allocation table. Input: largest wallet holds 99.96%, by the address's position; addresses are not merged by who owns them, and whether the largest is a person, another vault or a custodian is not established. The reading 1.00 is that share less 25%, over 75%: a quarter or less reads 0, the whole vault 1. The overall band weighs every component together instead, so it can read better than this and is not in conflict with it: a dimension says how bad its worst reading is, the band says what the whole weighs.

Low observed risk is not zero risk. The overall band weighs every component together instead, so it can read better than this and is not in conflict with it: a dimension says how bad its worst reading is, the band says what the whole weighs.

Of the curator's powers, read one by one: Each of the curator's 15 timelocked functions was read from the contract at block 26,327,494: its delay, and whether it has been abdicated. The 3 gates that can lock depositors out (setSendSharesGate, setReceiveAssetsGate, setReceiveSharesGate) are abdicated: the contract records each as given up, and it has no function that reverses an abdication. That holds while this code is the vault's: the address carries the contract itself (21,808 bytes) with no proxy implementation, beacon or admin slot set, so we found no way to replace it. Pointing funds somewhere new, or raising a cap, waits its delay, during which a sentinel can revoke it. Fees can change at once, within the contract's ceilings: setPerformanceFee, setManagementFee, setForceDeallocatePenalty. Allocators move funds between destinations already added, within the caps, at once, as the contract intends; who they are was not checked. The owner names the curator and the sentinels, at once; this contract gives it no function that moves funds or sets a gate, a cap or a fee itself, and a new curator's changes wait the same delays. This is not part of the overall band: a vault reading low can read high here.

By weight, 82.5 of the 82.5 points that apply were read, which is 100% of the component weight the band could draw on (a different denominator: components are not equally weighted); the rest of the 100 is the weight of what does not apply. This is a statement about our coverage and carries no level of its own, because how much we could read is not a risk the vault runs.