The NUVA USDC Main vault allows users to deploy USDC with exclusive exposure to Real World Assets RWA tokenized and issued by NUVA (BVI) SPC.
The contract imposes NO notice period: a redeem settles in the transaction that asks for it. That is not a promise of an instant exit — it is still subject to the vault having the money, which is the liquidity reading and a separate question — but there is no queue, no request step and no lock-up in the contract.
The overall band reads `moderate` while 3 dimensions read worse: market severe, liquidity high, concentration high. The band weighs them against everything else, which is why it can read better without being in conflict.
The contract holds 1,569,098.86 USDC, read from the chain by its token. At the price we publish that is $1.57M, against the $1.57M shown above.
Only half of this is ours. The quantity comes from the contract and can be checked by anybody; the price comes from defillama:coins, so a wrong price would move both figures together and this would still agree.
Over 98 daily readings it has ranged from 3.00% to 6.20%, averaging 4.66%. The tile below shows today’s quote alone.
98 readings is 98 days, not a year. We began taking them on 2026-09-19 and this window grows with the record rather than standing in for a longer one.
The published ratio divides the realised rate by the rate this vault quotes TODAY. Over 98 of the 72 days the return covers we hold its own quotes, it advertised between 3.00% and 6.20%, averaging 4.66%, and today's quote is an ordinary one for this vault. Against the average it quoted, the realised rate is 99.15% of it. 27 of those days we recorded ourselves and 71 come from the venue's own published history, which is the same fact read later rather than a different one.
The verdict band is published with the answer: below 0.5 of the advertised rate is short, above 1.5 is beating, everything between is in line. It is wide on purpose, because the two rates are measured differently: one is what the venue quotes, the other is what its own share price did.
A quoted rate is one input, not a verdict. These are the same seven fields in the same order for every vault, so a high rate and a high rate nobody can withdraw from do not look alike.
$10.0k would be $10.0k , a gain of $37.85, 0.4% over 30 days.
Computed from the price of one share, so another depositor arriving is never counted as this strategy’s performance. Fees the venue charges inside the share price are included; anything charged outside it is not. It says what this vault did between two dates and nothing whatever about what it will do next.
Everything above is reconstructed from public data. A declaration is free, signed from this vault’s own key, and cannot be edited afterwards.Note 28
Six questions, and what we hold for each. This is not a score and there is no letter at the end of it: the answers are different kinds of thing and compressing them into one number would hide exactly the part a reader needs. Where we have nothing, the row says so.
One party holds more than one of the roles, or nobody can veto a change once its timelock expires.
Read over 30 days and no asset movement could be attributed to the manager. That is a reading, not an absence of one, every transfer in the window travelled with a deposit or a withdrawal.
A vault that is eighty per cent one depositor is a vault whose price can be reset by a single withdrawal, and whose headline TVL says almost nothing about whether anyone else believes in it. Concentration is the risk a return figure never shows, and it moves before the return line does.
See what unlocksAlready a customer? Sign in| Risk |
|---|
| Reads |
|---|
| In the band |
|---|
| From |
|---|
| Market | Severeworse than the band | Yes | drawdown, crowding |
| Liquidity | Highworse than the band | Yes | exit |
| Concentration | Highworse than the band | Yes | concentration |
| Operating | Low | Yes | consistency |
| Controller | Low | No | who may move the money |
| Evidence | Not read | No | 5 of 5 components read (100% of the weight) |
The levels come from this vault’s own risk components and controller reading. The bars draw them; they are not a second calculation, and there is deliberately no overall figure.
Figures computed from the share price read from the vault contract as we went: 2026-08-09 to 2026-10-15, 95 observations. 30-day window from 2026-09-15. Readings from Morpho’s own daily record of the vault, reconstructed afterwards (479) and the share price read from the contract at past blocks, reconstructed afterwards (33) exist and are not mixed in: one series, one source.
Amber means the evidence is incomplete, never that the vault is risky, and grey means we did not read it rather than that there is nothing to read. Nothing here is a rating, a recommendation, or a statement that this vault is safe.
These fields are empty because nobody has attested them, not because we failed to find them. An operator who registers gets a record that provably cannot be edited after the fact, and a grade no unregistered strategy can reach.
1 change since 2026-09-19. The most recent was 2026-09-21: the curator was set to 0xbbac…f918. Each is one public transaction that no venue announced. Anything before 2026-09-19 predates this platform holding control state and is not reconstructed.
Attributed collateral only. A vault accepting many collaterals at once reports less here than it holds, so this is what we can attribute rather than everything it is lent against.
2 markets read, $1.57M attributed. 1 of them has been liquidated since we began reading, and none of those left debt unrecovered. The market by market rows, and this vault’s share of each, are part of the crowding data.