The contract imposes NO notice period: a redeem settles in the transaction that asks for it. That is not a promise of an instant exit — it is still subject to the vault having the money, which is the liquidity reading and a separate question — but there is no queue, no request step and no lock-up in the contract.
The overall band reads `low` while 1 dimension read worse: concentration severe. The band weighs them against everything else, which is why it can read better without being in conflict.
| Risk | Reads | In the band | From |
|---|
A quoted rate is one input, not a verdict. These are the same seven fields in the same order for every vault, so a high rate and a high rate nobody can withdraw from do not look alike.
$10.0k would be $10.1k , a gain of $62.12, 0.6% over 89 days.
Computed from the price of one share, so another depositor arriving is never counted as this strategy’s performance. Fees the venue charges inside the share price are included; anything charged outside it is not. It says what this vault did between two dates and nothing whatever about what it will do next.
Everything above is reconstructed from public data. A declaration is free, signed from this vault’s own key, and cannot be edited afterwards.Note 28
Six questions, and what we hold for each. This is not a score and there is no letter at the end of it: the answers are different kinds of thing and compressing them into one number would hide exactly the part a reader needs. Where we have nothing, the row says so. 1 of 6 is not measured for this vault.
12 markets read, $4.51 attributed. 2 of them has nothing left unlent. 4 are capped at nothing: the curator permits no more money in, whatever is there now. 4 of them have been liquidated since we began reading, and none of those left debt unrecovered. The market by market rows, and this vault’s share of each, are part of the crowding data.
Read over 30 days and no asset movement could be attributed to the manager. That is a reading, not an absence of one, every transfer in the window travelled with a deposit or a withdrawal.
Timing indicates autonomous management, confidence 17%.
Timing only. This says nothing about whether the strategy is any good, a losing bot is still a bot.
A vault that is eighty per cent one depositor is a vault whose price can be reset by a single withdrawal, and whose headline TVL says almost nothing about whether anyone else believes in it. Concentration is the risk a return figure never shows, and it moves before the return line does.
See what unlocksAlready a customer? Sign in| Market | Low | Yes | drawdown |
| Liquidity | Low | Yes | exit |
| Concentration | Severeworse than the band | Yes | concentration |
| Operating | Low | Yes | consistency |
| Controller | Not read | No | who may move the money |
| Evidence | Not read | No | 4 of 5 components read (76% of the weight) |
The levels come from this vault’s own risk components and controller reading. The bars draw them; they are not a second calculation, and there is deliberately no overall figure.
Figures computed from the share price read from the vault contract as we went: 2026-02-13 to 2026-10-14, 430 observations. 30-day window from 2026-09-14, 90-day window from 2026-07-16. Readings from the share price read from the contract at past blocks, reconstructed afterwards (52) exist and are not mixed in: one series, one source.
Amber means the evidence is incomplete, never that the vault is risky, and grey means we did not read it rather than that there is nothing to read. Nothing here is a rating, a recommendation, or a statement that this vault is safe.
These fields are empty because nobody has attested them, not because we failed to find them. An operator who registers gets a record that provably cannot be edited after the fact, and a grade no unregistered strategy can reach.