The Steakhouse High Yield USDC vault aims to optimize for yield on a wider range of collateral markets.
The overall band reads low while 1 dimension read worse: market moderate.
We checked 34 addresses: roles and direct holders against the digital currency addresses OFAC SDN published on 2026-11-09; none of them is on it.
Exact address matches against one list (OFAC SDN, version 329a9b9c6e55). Not a legal opinion, and no exact match is not a finding that no sanctioned party is involved.
Which collateral backs what this vault has lent out, and what each one is.
Each market the vault supplies, by allocated dollars. Redeemable here is the smaller of this vault's supply and the market's free money.
| Market | Allocated | Util | Redeemable here | Share of TVL | Others here |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| syrupUSDC / USDC0x28b6…b684 | $123.8k | 90.1% | $123.8k | 99.3% | 2 · $333.3k |
| cirBTC / USDC0xc2db…815d | $7.29 | 91.0% | $7.29 | 0.0% | 4 · $150.02M |
Every daily reading we hold.
How much could leave now, how hard the money is working, and how much of the borrowing behind it sits close to liquidation.
1 daily readings so far. This needs 2 to draw, so it is not drawn yet. That is how much history we hold, not how much there is.
1 daily readings so far. This needs 2 to draw, so it is not drawn yet. That is how much history we hold, not how much there is.
We hold no daily readings yet, so there is nothing to draw. That is how much history we hold, not how much there is.
The vault, the markets it supplies, and the collateral its borrowers post. Under each market, how many other vaults we track lend into it; under each collateral, what it is and who holds it.
Largest allocations shown, up to four markets. Solid arrows are supply the curator chose; dashed boxes are collateral the curator does not control.
Morpho flags nothing on this vault at our last reading. Read from Morpho’s API at 10 November 2026, 16:12 UTC. These are Morpho’s labels, not our findings: we have not verified each, and they do not enter the risk score.
From this vault through its markets to the collateral, what it wraps and the asset it ends at, with the 5 other vaults lending into the same markets.
See what unlocksAlready a customer? Sign inThe contract holds 103,542.01 USDC, read from the chain by its token. At the price we publish that is $103.5k, against the $103.5k shown above.
Over 20 daily readings it has ranged from 0.00% to 9.91%, averaging 4.61%. The tile above shows the base rate as the venue last quoted it, alone.
The published ratio divides the realised rate by the base rate this vault quoted when the comparison was last computed (10 November 2026, 15:19 UTC).
Over 20 of the 21 days the return covers we hold its own quotes, it advertised between 0.00% and 9.91%, averaging 4.61%, and that quote is near the TOP of that range, so the published ratio is built on one of this vault's better quotes. Against the average it quoted, the realised rate is 181.04% of it. We hold no quote for the rest of the window, so this says what the venue was advertising while we watched and not across the whole return. 1 of those days we recorded ourselves and 19 come from the venue's own published history, which is the same fact read later rather than a different one.
Pick or type an amount to weigh it against both: what the venue says could leave now, and the largest single withdrawal anybody has made here.
The contract imposes no notice period and no request step: a redeem that succeeds settles in the transaction that asks for it, and it succeeds only if the vault holds enough to pay at that moment, which is the liquidity reading and a separate question.
There is no queue and no lock-up in the contract.
The three after Held add to it. Not verified is in no market we read: it may be cash or another allocation and is not counted as cash. The venue’s withdrawable figure overlaps them and is not added to them.
$12,364 of this vault's $124,700 is not observed as lent, which does not exceed what the vault holds; that is a check that one figure does not contradict the other, not a reconciliation of the two. The two figures were read 21 minutes apart, not together, which is enough on its own to move a figure this size.
A quoted rate is one input, not a verdict.
It moves only when the strategy earns or loses; deposits do not move it.
Dashed: what the venue advertised, 1 recorded by us since 2026-11-10 and 19 from the venue’s own published history.
Everything above is reconstructed from public data. A declaration is free, signed from this vault’s own key, and cannot be edited afterwards.Note 28
Six questions, and what we hold for each. 1 of these 6 questions is not measured for this vault. These are evidence questions, not the risk band’s components, which are counted under the six risks.
| Source mark | Question | What we hold | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| What does it hold or lend into? | 1 collateral read, $123.8k supplied, across 2 marketsRead from the vault’s own holdings. Concentration and the assets themselves are below. Its largest single market holds 6% of what anybody has supplied there. | Measured | |
| How much could leave now? | $123.9kThe venue's reported withdrawable liquidity, not verified as executable: no withdrawal of it was tried, and an ordinary withdrawal by a given holder may get less. Not the same as what is idle. | Measured | |
| Who runs it, and what else have they run? |
Attributed collateral only.
A vault accepting many collaterals at once reports less here than it holds, so this is what we can attribute rather than everything it is lent against.
Where the vault's allocated capital sat each day from 2026-10-21 to 2026-11-10, as the venue reports it, across 2 destinations. A day's total is what was allocated, not the vault's total assets: cash held idle is not in it.
| Day | Allocated | syrupUSDC / USDC (LLTV 91.5%) | cirBTC / USDC (LLTV 86%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-11-10 | $83.5k | $83.5k | $7.29 |
| 2026-11-09 | $47.8k | $47.8k | $3.61 |
| 2026-11-08 | $57.2k | $57.2k | $3.61 |
| 2026-11-07 | $40.1k | $40.1k | $0.56 |
| 2026-11-06 | $8.6k | $8.6k | $0.56 |
| 2026-11-05 | $6.6k | $6.6k | $0.56 |
| 2026-11-04 | $2.6k | $2.6k | under $0.01 |
| 2026-11-03 | $2.6k | $2.6k | under $0.01 |
| 2026-11-02 | $2.4k | $2.4k | under $0.01 |
| 2026-11-01 | $8.57 | $8.57 | under $0.01 |
| 2026-10-31 | $8.55 | $8.55 | under $0.01 |
| 2026-10-30 | $8.57 | $8.57 | under $0.01 |
| 2026-10-29 | $6.07 | $6.07 | under $0.01 |
| 2026-10-28 | $1.01 | $1.01 | under $0.01 |
| 2026-10-27 | $1.01 | $1.01 | under $0.01 |
| 2026-10-26 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| 2026-10-25 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| 2026-10-24 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| 2026-10-23 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| 2026-10-22 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| 2026-10-21 | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
Locked here: every depositor we read with their share of the vault, the largest single wallet, and the ledger of each deposit and withdrawal. A vault that is eighty per cent one depositor is a vault whose price can be reset by a single withdrawal, and whose headline TVL says almost nothing about whether anyone else believes in it.
See what unlocksAlready a customer? Sign inWhat this page cannot show yet, and why.
The band weighs them against everything else, which is why it can read better without being in conflict.
Evidence · Not scored · 2 of 5 components read, 1 refused (60% of the weight)
Point at a risk to read what it rests on.
| Risk | Reads | In the band | From |
|---|---|---|---|
| Marketlimited scope: past share-price falls, markets shared with other vaults and, where the vault borrows, distance to liquidation; excludes collateral and borrower credit risk | Moderateworse than the band | Yes | crowding |
| Liquidity | Not read | Yes | nothing fed it |
| Depositor concentration | Low | Yes | concentration |
| Operatinglimited scope: continuity of the observed record; not a review of operations | Not read | Yes | nothing fed it |
| Controller | Not read | No | who may move the money |
| Evidence | Not scored | No | 2 of 5 risk-band components read, 1 refused (60% of the weight) |
The levels come from this vault’s own risk components and controller reading. The bars draw them; they are not a second calculation, and there is deliberately no overall figure.
Market here is two observed readings: the worst fall in the vault's past share price and how much of its lending shares a market with other vaults we track. It does not assess the collateral, the borrowers' ability to repay, a concentration in one market (read under where the capital rests), or whether withdrawals hold under stress. The overall band weighs every component together instead, so it can read better than this and is not in conflict with it: a dimension says how bad its worst reading is, the band says what the whole weighs.
That is our coverage, not a finding.
Low observed risk is not zero risk. It measures how much of the vault its largest depositor holds, not how much the vault lends into one market; that is the allocation table. Input: largest wallet holds 40%, by the address's position; addresses are not merged by who owns them, and whether the largest is a person, another vault or a custodian is not established. The reading 0.20 is that share less 25%, over 75%: a quarter or less reads 0, the whole vault 1. The overall band weighs every component together instead, so it can read better than this and is not in conflict with it: a dimension says how bad its worst reading is, the band says what the whole weighs.
Unexamined is not acceptable, and this is not part of the overall band either way.
By weight, 32 of the 82.5 points that apply were read, which is 60% of the component weight the band could draw on (a different denominator: components are not equally weighted); the rest of the 100 is the weight of what does not apply. This is a statement about our coverage and carries no level of its own, because how much we could read is not a risk the vault runs.
Every deposit and withdrawal drawn over the vault's value, the buckets of money in and out, the wallets that moved it and how big a whale is here.
See what unlocksAlready a customer? Sign inThese are the same seven fields in the same order for every vault, so a high rate and a high rate nobody can withdraw from do not look alike.
| Measured |
| What does it depend on? | Morpho Vaults V2 on ArcThe venue and the chain are known; what the strategy routes into underneath them has not been read. | Declared |
| Who can change it, and how fast? | —Access control has not been read for this vault. Who can move the money, and how quickly, is unknown. That is not the same as nobody being able to. | Not measured |
| How much of the above was measured? | 1 of 5 not measuredCounted from the rows above rather than asserted. Every figure on this page carries when it was read and what it was read from; the gaps are listed on /reconciliation with their size. | Measured |
This is not a score and there is no letter at the end of it: the answers are different kinds of thing and compressing them into one number would hide exactly the part a reader needs. Where we have nothing, the row says so.
The mark says where an answer came from, never whether it is good: a filled circle is a reading we made, a half circle an inference from readings we hold, quotation marks what the venue or operator states, and a dashed ring means we did not read it rather than that there is nothing to read.
Nothing here is a rating, a recommendation, or a statement that this vault is safe.
These fields are empty because nobody has attested them, not because we failed to find them.
An operator who registers gets a record that provably cannot be edited after the fact, and a grade no unregistered strategy can reach.
Band width is dollars on one scale. Attributed supply only: a vault in many markets at once reports less here than it holds.
2 markets read, $123.9k attributed. The market by market rows, and this vault’s share of each, are part of the crowding data.