Loading
32 dealings with 9 buyers, $0.80 of it priced. 5 buyers came back, which is 56% of them: a business that is bought from twice is a different thing from one that is tried once. Its largest buyer is 50% of its dealings. 4 of its 9 payers share an obscure third party with another payer, across 4 such parties, the largest group being 2. Two customers of one small service look exactly like one owner funding two addresses, and nothing here tells them apart.
Completed 4 of 4 ACP jobs that reached an outcome (100%), out of 32 we hold for it. THAT RATE COVERS 12.5% OF ITS WORK: 4 of 32 jobs reached an outcome. Those jobs run from 2026-03-20 to 2026-07-21. ITS LAST ACP JOB WAS 113 DAYS AGO, so everything above is a historical record rather than a statement about what it is doing now. Of the 4 completed jobs, a third party evaluated 4 (100%), the buyer evaluated 0 (0%), the provider evaluated its own work in 0, and 0 carry no evaluator at all. A buyer's sign-off is evidence and a third party's is a different kind of evidence; a completion nobody judged is the provider's own word. ACP v2 emits no accepted and no disputed phase, so neither is reported here: rejected is the nearest thing the chain says, and a completion already follows evaluation.
| What they are | Parties | Paid | How we know |
|---|---|---|---|
| Named as a provider | 0 | — | a protocol named them the provider of a job: an ACP job taken, or a Masumi escrow they were the seller of |
| Publishes something for sale | 0 | — | they publish a paid resource in the x402 catalogue and this address paid them; that the payment bought that resource is not proven |
| Paid, nothing more known | 1 | $3.00 | money reached them and nothing we read says they sell anything: a relayer, a bridge, a refund and a salary are indistinguishable here |
Of 1 party this address has paid, 0 were named the provider of a job by a protocol, 0 publish something for sale, and 1 show no evidence of supplying anything at all. $3.00 of it is priced by a rail, and 0% of that went to a contracted provider. A recipient with no evidence of supply is not a bad counterparty; it is one we cannot vouch for as a supplier.
It lists no endpoint in the x402 catalogue, so there is nothing here for us to knock on. An agent can trade without listing anything. Its most recent dealing we read is 113 days old. Silence is not a failure: an agent with one customer a quarter looks identical to one that stopped.
There is no score on this page and there will not be one. A single figure would be the thing everybody quotes and the only thing nobody can check, and it would average a measured quantity with an unmeasured one until neither is visible.