⌘K

Economic profile

0x6d6606619ee7230f66791a49369aa58db4b0c65bthe full record as JSON

Payments received

Who pays it, how often, and are they separate parties

Dealings

191

Buyers

0 new in 90 days

Priced

—

where a rail priced it

Came back

—

1 of 1

Largest buyer

100%

of its dealings

Paid it back

money went both ways

Payers sharing a party

of 1

Last 30 days

dealings

191 dealings with 1 buyer, none of it priced by a rail. Its largest buyer is 100% of its dealings, so most of this record rests on one relationship. None of its 1 payers shares an obscure third party with another of them, which is the strongest thing we can say for their being separate parties.

Delivery reliability

What a completion is worth here

Completed

of 0 that ended

Rejected

Refunded

A third party signed off

—

0 had no evaluator

We hold 191 ACP jobs for this address and none has reached an outcome yet. Those jobs run from 2026-03-20 to 2026-03-24. ITS LAST ACP JOB WAS 231 DAYS AGO, so everything above is a historical record rather than a statement about what it is doing now. Nothing has completed, so there is nothing for an evaluator to have signed off. 191 jobs have no phase event we decoded, so they are in no outcome count above. That is our silence, not a state the chain reported. ACP v2 emits no accepted and no disputed phase, so neither is reported here: rejected is the nearest thing the chain says, and a completion already follows evaluation.

Economic dependencies

Who it rests on, and on what evidence

What they are	Paid	How we know
Named as a provider	—	a protocol named them the provider of a job: an ACP job taken, or a Masumi escrow they were the seller of
Publishes something for sale	—	they publish a paid resource in the x402 catalogue and this address paid them; that the payment bought that resource is not proven
Paid, nothing more known	—	money reached them and nothing we read says they sell anything: a relayer, a bridge, a refund and a salary are indistinguishable here

This address has paid nobody on a rail we read. That is not "it depends on nobody": a model, an endpoint, a host and a key are dependencies we cannot see.

Operating health

Do its endpoints answer, and is it still trading

Endpoints listed

0 knocked on

Answered with a price

Gone or silent

Last dealing

231d ago

It lists no endpoint in the x402 catalogue, so there is nothing here for us to knock on. An agent can trade without listing anything. Its most recent dealing we read is 231 days old. Silence is not a failure: an agent with one customer a quarter looks identical to one that stopped.

What none of this can see

revenue that never touched a rail we read: an invoice, a bank transfer, a private agreement
the dependencies that are not payments: a model, a host, an endpoint, an API key, a person
whether a completed job was any good; we can say who signed it off, not what they received
anything about the operator behind the address, beyond what the chain and the catalogue say

There is no score on this page and there will not be one. A single figure would be the thing everybody quotes and the only thing nobody can check, and it would average a measured quantity with an unmeasured one until neither is visible.