⌘K

Live evidencecounted 11m ago

7.01days of PURR volume to unwind the crowd98%of the XMR book on one side, across 30 vaults$2.02Bunder one key with no guardian, 91 of the 515 vaults whose control we have read$430.1Mwhose control we have never read, across 3,460 vaults$2.30Bsitting in vaults and not lent out$12.32Bunder 3,975 vaults we read$4.83Bin 353 vaults where we saw automated execution, nothing declared2,336vaults declared or on a venue built to run software, holding $938.1k348software-run vaults scored, 13% of them463operators identified behind them26networks where we read capital, from Ethereum to Cardano33,168,631deposits and withdrawals read from chain185changes recorded in the last day1,736,330ERC-8004 agent registrations read+20.31/ 30 days1,468,209distinct owners behind those registrations208,200registrations carrying a readable card, 12%3,503,982paid requests on the Olas rail (deliveries are counted apart)+0.61/ 30 days101suppliers delivering that work413,906agent-to-agent jobs read on Base−0.67/ 30 days$1.0Msettled between agents, all time1,179suppliers listed on the ACP rail186agents live on Cardano79Cardano agents deregistered, 30% of all ever minted17,854escrows between Cardano agents since Jun 2025, 156 still open83%of every agent payment we read comes from 697 addresses that never stop26,359addresses paid once and never came back, of 52,574 that ever paid726of those payers are an agent we can name, 1.381% of them374agent hosts answered when we asked, of 2,653 probed17,121agents sit behind a host that answers nothing at all432msmedian answer from the 743 hosts that answer37%of all agent ratings were written by ten addresses, of 835,505 ratings read155,078rated agents have exactly one rater, of 173,627 rated at all206,334service endpoints declared across 100,468 agent cards we read7.01days of PURR volume to unwind the crowd98%of the XMR book on one side, across 30 vaults$2.02Bunder one key with no guardian, 91 of the 515 vaults whose control we have read$430.1Mwhose control we have never read, across 3,460 vaults$2.30Bsitting in vaults and not lent out$12.32Bunder 3,975 vaults we read$4.83Bin 353 vaults where we saw automated execution, nothing declared2,336vaults declared or on a venue built to run software, holding $938.1k348software-run vaults scored, 13% of them463operators identified behind them26networks where we read capital, from Ethereum to Cardano33,168,631deposits and withdrawals read from chain185changes recorded in the last day1,736,330ERC-8004 agent registrations read+20.31/ 30 days1,468,209distinct owners behind those registrations208,200registrations carrying a readable card, 12%3,503,982paid requests on the Olas rail (deliveries are counted apart)+0.61/ 30 days101suppliers delivering that work413,906agent-to-agent jobs read on Base−0.67/ 30 days$1.0Msettled between agents, all time1,179suppliers listed on the ACP rail186agents live on Cardano79Cardano agents deregistered, 30% of all ever minted17,854escrows between Cardano agents since Jun 2025, 156 still open83%of every agent payment we read comes from 697 addresses that never stop26,359addresses paid once and never came back, of 52,574 that ever paid726of those payers are an agent we can name, 1.381% of them374agent hosts answered when we asked, of 2,653 probed17,121agents sit behind a host that answers nothing at all432msmedian answer from the 743 hosts that answer37%of all agent ratings were written by ten addresses, of 835,505 ratings read155,078rated agents have exactly one rater, of 173,627 rated at all206,334service endpoints declared across 100,468 agent cards we read

Economic profile

0x6aa67b57447c3d7f6f4e1b9ed3fa1c3ae516c78ethe full record as JSON

Payments received

Who pays it, how often, and are they separate parties

Dealings

25,745

Buyers

0 new in 90 days

Priced

—

where a rail priced it

Came back

100%

98 of 98

Largest buyer

of its dealings

Paid it back

money went both ways

Payers sharing a party

of 98

Last 30 days

dealings

25,745 dealings with 98 buyers, none of it priced by a rail. 98 buyers came back, which is 100% of them: a business that is bought from twice is a different thing from one that is tried once. Its largest buyer is 1% of its dealings. None of its 98 payers shares an obscure third party with another of them, which is the strongest thing we can say for their being separate parties.

Delivery reliability

What a completion is worth here

Completed

of 0 that ended

Rejected

Refunded

A third party signed off

—

0 had no evaluator

We hold 25,745 ACP jobs for this address and none has reached an outcome yet. Those jobs run from 2026-04-17 to 2026-04-26. ITS LAST ACP JOB WAS 199 DAYS AGO, so everything above is a historical record rather than a statement about what it is doing now. Nothing has completed, so there is nothing for an evaluator to have signed off. 25,745 jobs have no phase event we decoded, so they are in no outcome count above. That is our silence, not a state the chain reported. ACP v2 emits no accepted and no disputed phase, so neither is reported here: rejected is the nearest thing the chain says, and a completion already follows evaluation.

Economic dependencies

Who it rests on, and on what evidence

What they are	Parties	Paid	How we know
Named as a provider	2	$210.18	a protocol named them the provider of a job: an ACP job taken, or a Masumi escrow they were the seller of
Publishes something for sale	0	—	they publish a paid resource in the x402 catalogue and this address paid them; that the payment bought that resource is not proven
Paid, nothing more known	0	—	money reached them and nothing we read says they sell anything: a relayer, a bridge, a refund and a salary are indistinguishable here

Of 2 parties this address has paid, 2 were named the provider of a job by a protocol, 0 publish something for sale, and 0 show no evidence of supplying anything at all. $210.18 of it is priced by a rail, and 100% of that went to a contracted provider.

Operating health

Do its endpoints answer, and is it still trading

Endpoints listed

0 knocked on

Answered with a price

Gone or silent

Last dealing

199d ago

It lists no endpoint in the x402 catalogue, so there is nothing here for us to knock on. An agent can trade without listing anything. Its most recent dealing we read is 199 days old. Silence is not a failure: an agent with one customer a quarter looks identical to one that stopped.

What none of this can see

revenue that never touched a rail we read: an invoice, a bank transfer, a private agreement
the dependencies that are not payments: a model, a host, an endpoint, an API key, a person
whether a completed job was any good; we can say who signed it off, not what they received
anything about the operator behind the address, beyond what the chain and the catalogue say

There is no score on this page and there will not be one. A single figure would be the thing everybody quotes and the only thing nobody can check, and it would average a measured quantity with an unmeasured one until neither is visible.