Loading
162 dealings with 10 buyers, $1.78 of it priced. 9 buyers came back, which is 90% of them: a business that is bought from twice is a different thing from one that is tried once. Its largest buyer is 53% of its dealings, so most of this record rests on one relationship. 6 of its 10 payers share an obscure third party with another payer, across 18 such parties, the largest group being 3. Two customers of one small service look exactly like one owner funding two addresses, and nothing here tells them apart.
Completed 75 of 136 ACP jobs that reached an outcome (55.15%), out of 162 we hold for it. THAT RATE COVERS 83.95% OF ITS WORK: 136 of 162 jobs reached an outcome. Those jobs run from 2026-03-24 to 2026-05-05. ITS LAST ACP JOB WAS 189 DAYS AGO, so everything above is a historical record rather than a statement about what it is doing now. Of the 75 completed jobs, a third party evaluated 24 (32%), the buyer evaluated 51 (68%), the provider evaluated its own work in 0, and 0 carry no evaluator at all. A buyer's sign-off is evidence and a third party's is a different kind of evidence; a completion nobody judged is the provider's own word. 20 jobs carry a payment the chain called refunded, 14.71% of the ones that ended. ACP v2 emits no accepted and no disputed phase, so neither is reported here: rejected is the nearest thing the chain says, and a completion already follows evaluation.
| What they are | Parties | Paid | How we know |
|---|---|---|---|
| Named as a provider | 0 | — | a protocol named them the provider of a job: an ACP job taken, or a Masumi escrow they were the seller of |
| Publishes something for sale | 0 | — | they publish a paid resource in the x402 catalogue and this address paid them; that the payment bought that resource is not proven |
| Paid, nothing more known | 1 | $2.92 | money reached them and nothing we read says they sell anything: a relayer, a bridge, a refund and a salary are indistinguishable here |
Of 1 party this address has paid, 0 were named the provider of a job by a protocol, 0 publish something for sale, and 1 show no evidence of supplying anything at all. $2.92 of it is priced by a rail, and 0% of that went to a contracted provider. A recipient with no evidence of supply is not a bad counterparty; it is one we cannot vouch for as a supplier.
It lists no endpoint in the x402 catalogue, so there is nothing here for us to knock on. An agent can trade without listing anything. Its most recent dealing we read is 189 days old. Silence is not a failure: an agent with one customer a quarter looks identical to one that stopped.
There is no score on this page and there will not be one. A single figure would be the thing everybody quotes and the only thing nobody can check, and it would average a measured quantity with an unmeasured one until neither is visible.