⌘K

Economic profile

0x5db57bf13ee8bc6d48c3c67282a4a8cfd5db3a35the full record as JSON

Payments received

Who pays it, how often, and are they separate parties

Dealings

Buyers

8 new in 90 days

Priced

$0.63

where a rail priced it

Came back

75%

6 of 8

Largest buyer

58%

of its dealings

Paid it back

money went both ways

Payers sharing a party

—

not tested

Last 30 days

dealings

33 dealings with 8 buyers, $0.63 of it priced. 6 buyers came back, which is 75% of them: a business that is bought from twice is a different thing from one that is tried once. Its largest buyer is 58% of its dealings, so most of this record rests on one relationship. 1 of its buyers have also been paid BY it. Money going both ways is not a sale twice; it is one relationship we cannot see the shape of.

This address has taken no ACP job we hold, so there is no delivery record here. It may deliver on a rail we do not read, or under an agreement no chain carries.

Economic dependencies

Who it rests on, and on what evidence

What they are	Parties	Paid	How we know
Named as a provider	0	—	a protocol named them the provider of a job: an ACP job taken, or a Masumi escrow they were the seller of
Publishes something for sale	1	$0.64	they publish a paid resource in the x402 catalogue and this address paid them; that the payment bought that resource is not proven
Paid, nothing more known	0	—	money reached them and nothing we read says they sell anything: a relayer, a bridge, a refund and a salary are indistinguishable here

Of 1 party this address has paid, 0 were named the provider of a job by a protocol, 1 publish something for sale, and 0 show no evidence of supplying anything at all. $0.64 of it is priced by a rail, and 0% of that went to a contracted provider. 1 of the recipients have also paid this address, which is a two-way flow rather than a purchase: a refund, a trade and an affiliate all look like that.

Operating health

Do its endpoints answer, and is it still trading

Endpoints listed

3 knocked on

Answered with a price

Gone or silent

Last dealing

1d ago

Of 3 listed endpoints we have knocked on 3: 1 answered with a price, 0 said the resource is gone, 0 did not answer, and 2 answered something else. We never send payment, so this is the unpaid half of the handshake: an endpoint that quotes may still fail to deliver once paid. Its most recent dealing we read is 1 day old. Silence is not a failure: an agent with one customer a quarter looks identical to one that stopped.

What none of this can see

revenue that never touched a rail we read: an invoice, a bank transfer, a private agreement
the dependencies that are not payments: a model, a host, an endpoint, an API key, a person
whether a completed job was any good; we can say who signed it off, not what they received
anything about the operator behind the address, beyond what the chain and the catalogue say

There is no score on this page and there will not be one. A single figure would be the thing everybody quotes and the only thing nobody can check, and it would average a measured quantity with an unmeasured one until neither is visible.