Loading
Operators
Strategies run
4
1 live · 3 closed
Live TVL
$10.5k
Agent-managed
1
with evidence
Best result
9.1%
their headline number
Cohort average
9.1%
equal-weighted, 1 of 4 with data
Management mode
discretionary
inferred
Realised P&L
+$244.97
across 1 of 4 strategies
Strategies priced
1 of 4
3 with no execution record
Losing strategies
0 of 1
of those we can price
Median lifetime
347d
1 alive · 3 closed
The P&L above covers 1 of 4 strategies. The other 3 carry no execution record, almost always because they closed before we began observing, and a dead vault’s fills cannot be fetched back. Those are disproportionately the failures, so read this figure as a floor on the losses and a ceiling on the gains.
What this firm is actually holding
1 book on hyperliquid.clearinghouseState · read 2026-09-09 21:21 UTC$7.0k
gross, what can be forcibly closed
$7.0k
net, the view actually held
—
offset across margin accounts, which is not a hedge
100% of the gross is directional. Netting is only real where both sides share margin. Where they do not, the exchange liquidates each account on its own: a long in one vault does not rescue a short in another, so the net understates what can be closed against this firm and the gross is the number that matters.
| Instrument | Gross | Net | Cancels | Across |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZEC | $1.5k | +$1.5k | — | one account |
| MORPHO | $849.96 | +$849.96 | — | one account |
| DASH | $800.37 | +$800.37 | — | one account |
| VIRTUAL | $654.02 | +$654.02 | — |
Financial record
1 strategy · 1 venue · 1 chainCapital under management$10.5k
Return, capital-weightednot establishednothing here could be measured
No return measurable$10.5kno share-price history $10.5k
Not established yet
Earned outside these strategies—service revenue, jobs
Cost of operating—inference, data, compute
Borrowed—credit and leverage
Blank because nobody has read them, not because they are zero. Each will carry the reading it came from when it arrives, a figure assembled by assigning payments to categories is a guess, and a guess cannot be checked the way XJ Systematic Dual’s capital can.
Evidence record
4 strategies across the firmHow each record can be checkedNote 9
A · attestedpre-trade committed, sequence complete, anchored on chain0
A− · pre-registereddeclared to us before it ran, so the claim precedes the result0
B · venue-verifiableobservable on chain or at the venue, cohort unproven4$10.5k
C · reportedfrom an aggregator, not read directly0
D · uncheckednothing we can check, usually no contract address0
Why we say software decidesNote 3
Survivorship
This operator has run 4 strategies that we can see. Their best shows 9.1%; the equal-weighted average across everything they ran is 9.1%. A leaderboard would show you only the first number. 3 of the 4 have no usable history, so the average is computed over 1 and is likely still flattering.
Every strategy, best to worstclosed ones included, ranked last
| # | Strategy | Platform | Network | Status | Autonomy | TVL | Return | Max DD | Sortino | History | Confidence |
|---|