Registrations whose on-chain card declares an endpoint on this host. Declared, not called: we record that somebody wrote it down, and nothing here says the host answers.
This host reads as a handful of parties. The largest holder has 6,930 of them, 82% of the registrations here. None of this is an accusation: running many agents from one deployment is a reasonable thing to do, and the point is only that the count of registrations is not a count of parties.
This host
One deployment can register the same agent on several chains, so a host spread across chains is one party as easily as many.
The addresses that own the registrations declaring this host, largest first. An address is the only thing in a registry that can be counted honestly: names, endpoints and descriptions are all free to write.
| Holder | Registrations | Share | Networks |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0xc15366b9…7d03 | 6,930 | 82% | |
| 0xfb2ff4eb…a2c5 | 1,555 | 18% | |
| 0x4c5ad2f5…c8a3 | 2 | <0.1% |
Three of 5 holders shown. The rest are on a plan, because naming every address behind a third party is the part somebody pays for.