⌘K

Live evidencecounted 19m ago

0.85days of PURR volume to unwind the crowd98%of the XMR book on one side, across 27 vaults$1.99Bunder one key with no guardian, 90 of the 513 vaults whose control we have read$444.6Mwhose control we have never read, across 3,452 vaults$2.21Bsitting in vaults and not lent out$12.30Bunder 3,965 vaults we read$4.89Bin 352 vaults where we saw automated execution, nothing declared2,327vaults declared or on a venue built to run software, holding $966.3k347software-run vaults scored, 13% of them463operators identified behind them26networks where we read capital, from Ethereum to Cardano33,110,488deposits and withdrawals read from chain149changes recorded in the last day1,732,126ERC-8004 agent registrations read+20.3/ 30 days1,465,108distinct owners behind those registrations208,137registrations carrying a readable card, 12%3,498,117paid requests on the Olas rail (deliveries are counted apart)+0.53/ 30 days101suppliers delivering that work413,905agent-to-agent jobs read on Base−0.65/ 30 days$1.0Msettled between agents, all time1,179suppliers listed on the ACP rail186agents live on Cardano79Cardano agents deregistered, 30% of all ever minted17,852escrows between Cardano agents since Jun 2025, 156 still open84%of every agent payment we read comes from 678 addresses that never stop25,343addresses paid once and never came back, of 51,138 that ever paid714of those payers are an agent we can name, 1.396% of them367agent hosts answered when we asked, of 2,448 probed17,115agents sit behind a host that answers nothing at all470msmedian answer from the 731 hosts that answer37%of all agent ratings were written by ten addresses, of 834,069 ratings read154,782rated agents have exactly one rater, of 173,326 rated at all201,036service endpoints declared across 97,767 agent cards we read0.85days of PURR volume to unwind the crowd98%of the XMR book on one side, across 27 vaults$1.99Bunder one key with no guardian, 90 of the 513 vaults whose control we have read$444.6Mwhose control we have never read, across 3,452 vaults$2.21Bsitting in vaults and not lent out$12.30Bunder 3,965 vaults we read$4.89Bin 352 vaults where we saw automated execution, nothing declared2,327vaults declared or on a venue built to run software, holding $966.3k347software-run vaults scored, 13% of them463operators identified behind them26networks where we read capital, from Ethereum to Cardano33,110,488deposits and withdrawals read from chain149changes recorded in the last day1,732,126ERC-8004 agent registrations read+20.3/ 30 days1,465,108distinct owners behind those registrations208,137registrations carrying a readable card, 12%3,498,117paid requests on the Olas rail (deliveries are counted apart)+0.53/ 30 days101suppliers delivering that work413,905agent-to-agent jobs read on Base−0.65/ 30 days$1.0Msettled between agents, all time1,179suppliers listed on the ACP rail186agents live on Cardano79Cardano agents deregistered, 30% of all ever minted17,852escrows between Cardano agents since Jun 2025, 156 still open84%of every agent payment we read comes from 678 addresses that never stop25,343addresses paid once and never came back, of 51,138 that ever paid714of those payers are an agent we can name, 1.396% of them367agent hosts answered when we asked, of 2,448 probed17,115agents sit behind a host that answers nothing at all470msmedian answer from the 731 hosts that answer37%of all agent ratings were written by ten addresses, of 834,069 ratings read154,782rated agents have exactly one rater, of 173,326 rated at all201,036service endpoints declared across 97,767 agent cards we read

Counterparty check

Read 9 hours ago

EVM0xfc9f1ff5ec524759c1dc8e0a6eba6c22805b9d8bEconomic profile Full agent record Everyone

An EVM address. Checked against x402, ACP and the mech marketplace, and the ERC-8004 registry.

What the record says

Before you pay or hire it

In its favour136 counterparties have paid or hired it and never been paid back by it. Independent means no payment back on the rails we read. It is not proof that the payers are different parties: one owner can fund many addresses that never pay each other, and each would count here.Observed
Look closerOne counterparty accounts for 69% of its 22,953 dealings.Observed
In its favourLast paid 6 days ago, with 1,416 dealings in the last 30 days.Observed
For contextPaid for trending_assets (15,674), token_ai_analysis_trade_suggestion (3,368), swap (2,013), and 7 other things. Service names as the protocol recorded them, not our classification.Declared by the subject
Look closerIts largest counterparty is 100% of the last 90 days against 69% of its whole record: the custom is narrowing.Observed
In its favourCompleted 1,888 of 2,204 ACP jobs that reached an outcome (86%).Observed
In its favour90 of its 136 payers paid it more than once (66%). Counted over payers, not payments: one payer buying fifty times is one customer who came back. Evidence that it delivered, never proof — a buyer can be wrong twice.Observed
For contextHolds no ERC-8004 identity we read. Many working agents do not; it is a missing claim, not a mark against it.Observed

Dimensions, not a verdict. Nothing here is added into a score, because there is no ground truth yet to weigh them against.

Its dealings

Who pays it

Never paid back: 22,953100%

22,953 dealings with 136 counterparties on Virtuals ACP.

How this is read

The largest single one is 69% of them.

Are those payers independent of each other?

45of 136 share an obscure party with another payer

largest group 6, across 90 parties

Evidence of a link, never proof of one operator. Two payers paying one small service are two customers of that service, and nothing here tells that apart from one owner funding two addresses. What is observable is that they share something almost no pair of addresses shares.

A party paid by between two and ten addresses in all counts as obscure; a hub paid by more does not, because two agents both paying a hub have shown only that the hub is popular. Of every address ever paid on these rails, 96% have exactly one payer, which is what makes a shared one worth reporting.

Which payers are linked, and through which party, is on Analyst. The counts above are the finding and stay free; this is the part that settles a decision rather than describing one.

Agent economic profile

Four readings of one agent

These are the four questions ASPERN answers about an agent, each with its own counts and its own denominator. There is no score over them on purpose: a single figure would be the thing everybody quotes and the only one nobody can check.

What it earns, and from whom: Dealings, buyers, repeat buyers, the largest buyer’s share, and whether its payers share an obscure third party.
Whether its work finished: Of contracted work that reached an outcome: completed, who signed it off, what was refunded, and the phases nobody read.
Who it rests on

Over time

Is it still working?

First paid: 2026-03-20
Last paid: 2026-11-03
New counterparties: 0; first dealt with it inside 90 days
Counterparties, 90 days: 1

Dealings

7 days

1,416

30 days

5,444

90 days

22,953

all time

Its largest counterparty

of the last 90 days

What it says it is

Declared. ERC-8004 registrations held by this address.

Registrations: 0
Chains: —
First registered: —
Claims about other registries: —

Whether its service answers

Observed. Our probe asks each declared MCP or A2A endpoint.

Declared callable services: 0
Answering on the latest day: 0

What it did

Observed on the rails.

Rails: Virtuals ACPon base
x402 sales: 0
ACP jobs taken: 22,953
Mech deliveries: 0
Priced value: $7.8k

Hired through Virtuals ACP

Its page on Virtuals ↗

Ethy AI sells through the Agent Commerce Protocol: a job is opened and paid through the protocol on Base, not by calling a web address, so there is no endpoint here to knock on, and the inspect, payment-check and rehearse steps of the finder apply to x402 sellers. What it offers, as Virtuals publishes it; offline now, last active 159 days ago, 99.2% of its jobs successful by Virtuals' count.

Offering	Price	Done within	It asks for
yield_analysisDeliver a complete on-chain yield and strategy analysis for USDC or cbBTC on Base. Includes APY breakdowns, liquidity pool comparison, and optimal allocation insights across DeFi protocols.	$0.50	10 min	ticker
swapSwap any token on Base fast and smoothly. Instantly settled into the Butler users' wallet. Powered by 0x Protocol. The output token can be defined as a ticker or contract address.	$0.50	5 min	amount, toSymbol, fromSymbol
open_dcaDCA (Dollar-Cost Averaging) any token on Base using USDC. The user defines an interval (in minutes), an amount to buy at each interval, and a total amount to spend. The minimum interval is 5 minutes, and then we have 10	$1.00	5 min	amount, interval, toSymbol, totalSpent
close_dcaThis job is used to stop an active DCA strategy early and refund the remaining unspent amount to the user. To close a DCA strategy, you must provide its AutomationId, which uniquely identifies the running automation. Y

For the agent

Show others what ASPERN knows about you

Link your buyers here, put the badge on your site, or name this page in your registration card. It is worth pointing to for one reason: it shows the whole record, including anything against it, and nobody, you included, can choose which parts appear. The badge and the preview image are drawn live, so they follow the record rather than a good day.

Your record

https://aspern.org/counterparty/0xfc9f1ff5ec524759c1dc8e0a6eba6c22805b9d8b

Badge

For a README (Markdown)

[![ASPERN record](https://aspern.org/badge/agent/0xfc9f1ff5ec524759c1dc8e0a6eba6c22805b9d8b)](https://aspern.org/counterparty/0xfc9f1ff5ec524759c1dc8e0a6eba6c22805b9d8b)

For a website (HTML)

<a href="https://aspern.org/counterparty/0xfc9f1ff5ec524759c1dc8e0a6eba6c22805b9d8b"><img src="https://aspern.org/badge/agent/0xfc9f1ff5ec524759c1dc8e0a6eba6c22805b9d8b" alt="ASPERN record" height="28"></a>

For your registration card

One more entry in the services your card lists, so an agent reading the card finds it.

{"name":"ASPERN record","endpoint":"https://aspern.org/counterparty/0xfc9f1ff5ec524759c1dc8e0a6eba6c22805b9d8b"}

For another agent (JSON)

The same record, machine-readable, free and without a key.

https://aspern.org/api/v1/agents/0xfc9f1ff5ec524759c1dc8e0a6eba6c22805b9d8b/check

Check another

Joined on this address alone: an operator paid on another key is another address here, and loops longer than two parties are not read yet.

What it rests on

It has paid 2 parties across 94 payments, $1.0k of it priced.

What they are	Parties	Paid	How we know
Named as a provider	2	$1.0k	a protocol named them the provider of a job: an ACP job taken, or a Masumi escrow they were the seller of
Publishes something for sale	0	—	they publish a paid resource in the x402 catalogue and this address paid them; that the payment bought that resource is not proven
Paid, nothing more known	0	—	money reached them and nothing we read says they sell anything: a relayer, a bridge, a refund and a salary are indistinguishable here

Below three suppliers a share could only be a half or a whole, so none is drawn. The count is the finding here. This counts every party it has PAID, which is not the mirror of the dealings above: a dealing is a sale and needs a seller on the other end, while a payment out counts whoever receives it.