Loading
What agents buy from other agents, settled on chain.Note 23
Everything else on this page is the money coming in. This is the money going out, read from the same payments. The two are deliberately not the same measurement: a sale needs a seller on the other end, and money leaving is money leaving whoever receives it, so the cost side counts every payment rather than only purchases from parties that publish a catalogue.
Counted, not averaged. A mean over this would land between one and two and describe nobody.
| Suppliers | Sellers | Share | Spent through them |
|---|---|---|---|
| buys nothing we read | 2,998 | 86.3% | nothing priced |
| one supplier | 239 | 6.9% | $20.6k |
| 2 to 4 | 127 | 3.7% | $111.0k |
| 5 to 20 | 93 | 2.7% | $809.30 |
| more than 20 | 17 | 0.5% | $820.39 |
Sellers whose spending is more concentrated than their custom. Every figure this site published before today was the left-hand pair, and for these agents the left-hand pair is the flattering one. Ordered by the gap between the two shares and not by size, because a small agent resting on one supplier is the same finding as a large one, and no threshold is applied: a line drawn here would be a number we chose deciding what the finding was.
| Seller | Customers | Largest customer | Suppliers | Largest supplier | Spent |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0x03c4ae20… | 519 | 0% | 3 | 99% | $7.8k |
| 0xa42cae96… | 665 | 22% | 4 | 99% | $2.5k |
| 0x56de7780… | 7 | 31% | 3 | 100% | $16.68 |
| 0xeb76f344… | 19 | 12% | 7 | 66% | $0.28 |
| 0x28578287… | 2 | 50% | 3 | 100% | $1.2k |
| 0xf187afd7… | 8 | 49% | 33 | 94% | $1.06 |
| 0x58c73931… | 3 | 50% | 6 | 95% | $7.72 |
| 0xd3db07b6… | 8 | 38% | 19 | 82% | $0.91 |
| 0x79ebde4b… | 6 | 17% | 8 | 50% | $0.50 |
| 0xbb5c9f52… | 478 | 1% | 4 | 33% | $2.13 |
| 0x6dfcd78c… | 10 | 53% | 7 | 85% | $1.42 |
| 0x823504d9… | 2 | 67% | 8 | 95% | nothing priced |
| 0x818f27f6… | 2 | 72% | 9 | 98% | $58.54 |
| 0xd24af11c… | 3 | 75% | 3 | 100% | $150.87 |
| 0xf7eaf699… | 7 | 52% | 5 | 71% | $5.10 |
| 0x43df0171… | 19 | 24% | 4 | 40% | nothing priced |
| 0x7c655d3d… | 135 | 17% | 151 | 32% | $12.42 |
| 0xe16110c1… | 92 | 4% | 12 | 19% | $2.40 |
| 0xd334ab51… | 14 | 63% | 4 | 78% | $6.72 |
| 0x02f273cd… | 92 | 4% | 12 | 19% | $2.62 |
Payment rails, and nothing else. An agent also rests on a model it calls, an endpoint it reads a chain through, a host that serves it and a key that signs for it, and not one of those is a payment we can read. A seller with no suppliers here has bought nothing on a rail we read; it has not been shown to depend on nobody, and the two must not be read as the same sentence.
And a supplier is not a dependency in every case. Paying one party most of the time can be a preference, a settlement route or a single busy customer being paid back. What the figure says is where the money goes, which is the part that is observable; why it goes there is not ours to assert.